[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-03-25 Thread Stefan Bader
** Attachment added: "Output of networkd-test.py" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2058743/+attachment/5759255/+files/networkd-test.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubunt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-03-25 Thread Stefan Bader
** Attachment added: "Journal of systemd while running the test" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2058743/+attachment/5759257/+files/systemd.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-03-25 Thread Stefan Bader
** Attachment added: "Log of the DNS resolving dnsmasq while running the test" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2058743/+attachment/5759256/+files/dnsmasq-vpn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is sub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-03-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Sounds like some interaction issue between the system, systemd, and dnsmasq somehow. As this fails on and off since a very long time. When I test with the older dnsmasq and getting a success the time spent on the test seems overly long. Like there is something not quite right even then. ** Also af

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058743] [NEW] systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-03-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Investigations done in 22.04/Jammy but may be affecting other series, too. The dnsmasq package recently was updated from 2.86-1.1ubuntu0.5 to 2.90-0ubuntu0.22.04.1. This seems to have brought back the same issue reported in bug #1957086. Sounds like both have interaction issu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038443] Re: mantic:linux: ubuntu_qrt_apparmor: ApparmorTestsuites.test_regression_testsuiteattach_disconnected.

2023-10-06 Thread Stefan Bader
I was going over the ADT results for the complete linux suite: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- mantic/mantic/amd64/l/linux/20231002_144159_55314@/log.gz (6.5.0-7.7) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038446] [NEW] mantic:linux: net:rtnetlink.sh: address proto IPv(4/6) failing

2023-10-04 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: 9017s 12:26:37 DEBUG| [stdout] # PASS: neigh get 9018s 12:26:38 DEBUG| [stdout] # PASS: bridge_parent_id 9018s 12:26:38 DEBUG| [stdout] # Error: either "local" is duplicate, or "proto" is a garbage. 9018s 12:26:38 DEBUG| [stdout] # Error: either "local" is duplicate, or "prot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038443] [NEW] mantic:linux: ubuntu_qrt_apparmor: ApparmorTestsuites.test_regression_testsuiteattach_disconnected.

2023-10-04 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: This might be apparmor, the test case, kernel or anything in between: 7720s running attach_disconnected 7720s Fatal Error (unix_fd_server): Unable to run test sub-executable ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-04 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1837227] Re: systemd mount units fail during boot, while file system is correctly mounted

2023-08-31 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837227 Title: systemd mount units fail du

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2016908] Re: udev fails to make prctl() syscall with apparmor=0 (as used by maas by default)

2023-05-12 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lunar) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016908 Title: udev fails to make prctl() sy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2016908] Re: udev fails to make prctl() syscall with apparmor=0 (as used by maas by default)

2023-04-28 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1856871] Re: i/o error if next unused loop device is queried

2023-04-06 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1856871] Re: i/o error if next unused loop device is queried

2023-03-30 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991285] Re: systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

2022-09-29 Thread Stefan Bader
To me it looks like the boot-and-services sub-tests got a lot less reliable on armhf in Focal. The previous systemd version had a higher chance of passing those. There always was root-unittests which required multiple attempts. But now from about 10 attempts there was one which had root-unittests o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991285] [NEW] systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

2022-09-29 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running systemd tests for linux/5.4.0-128.144 on focal. Whether this is caused by the dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined. Testing failed on: armhf: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] Re: network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-05-05 Thread Stefan Bader
With the revert, the network-manager ADT tests work again. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- jammy/jammy/amd64/n/network-manager/20220505_053118_fb2db@/log.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] Re: network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-05-03 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971418 Title: network-manager/1.36.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] Re: network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-05-03 Thread Stefan Bader
mmy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notif

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] Re: network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-05-03 Thread Stefan Bader
This seems to be related to: "rfkill: make new event layout opt-in" in the -28 kernel. When I revert that a local reproduction run starts to work again. However I never got the same error pattern as in the ADT logs (those seem to get random data back from trying to read the MAC address). So a littl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] [NEW] network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-05-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running network- manager tests for linux/5.15.0-28.29 on jammy. Whether this is caused by the dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined. Testing failed on: amd64: https://autopkgtest.ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969905] Re: lxc-test-no-new-privs in ubuntu_lxc failed on F-s390x zVM (lxc 1:4.0.12-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 )

2022-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Turns out that is a SUT which does not get freshly provisioned and had proposed enabled. And there is a newer lxc in proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960034] Re: systemd/248.3-1ubuntu8.2 ADT test failure with linux/5.13.0-29.32

2022-03-15 Thread Stefan Bader
>From ADT testing: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- focal/focal/arm64/s/systemd/20220310_155736_6a08c@/log.gz This was previously failing the storage subtest. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notificati

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925211] Re: Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute on s390x

2021-05-19 Thread Stefan Bader
Just as a heads up: The upstream stable update 5.11.20 for hirsute un-reverts - "s390/cio: remove pm support from ccw bus driver" and adds - "s390/cio: remove invalid condition on IO_SCH_UNREG" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925211] Re: Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute on s390x

2021-04-23 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925211 Title: Hot-unplug of disks leaves brok

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917601] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.8.0-45.51

2021-03-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Thanks Christian, I think we would for now mark this up as known issue in lxc. There is a bit of a mystery on our side as it seems right now as if this failed for couple of our releases and never appears to have been investigated/asked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917601] [NEW] lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.8.0-45.51

2021-03-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: We seem to get failed dep8 testing on lxc in Groovy for a while. What we are interested in is knowing whether this is known problems in the testing or something that waits on kernel fixes (who would be driving those if this is the case). Testing failed on: amd64: https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877088] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img which is required with the default zipl.conf

2021-02-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Updating the proposed change. This addresses the following: - Only run from the trigger stage when called from dpkg - Pass the same environmental flag as update-initramfs does (in theory there never should be need to generate an initrd) - Handle special case of installkernel called multiple times

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1910576] Re: [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

2021-01-13 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: [Availability] libbpf | 0.1.0-1 | groovy/universe | source libbpf | 0.3-2 | hirsute/universe | source [Rationale] Libbpf is (or is about to become) a dependency for building iproute2 which already is in main. Using BPF is becoming more wide-spread. The libr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1910576] Re: [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

2021-01-13 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: [Availability] libbpf | 0.1.0-1 | groovy/universe | source libbpf | 0.3-2 | hirsute/universe | source [Rationale] Libbpf is (or is about to become) a dependency for building iproute2 which already is in main. Using BPF is becoming more wide-spread. The libr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1910576] Re: [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

2021-01-13 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: [Availability] libbpf | 0.1.0-1 | groovy/universe | source libbpf | 0.3-2 | hirsute/universe | source [Rationale] Libbpf is (or is about to become) a dependency for building iproute2 which already is in main. Using BPF is becoming more wide-spread. The libr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1910576] Re: [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

2021-01-13 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: - [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2) + [Availability] + libbpf | 0.1.0-1 | groovy/universe | source + libbpf | 0.3-2 | hirsute/universe | source + + [Rationale] + Libbpf is (or is about to become) a dependency for building iproute2 which already is in main. Using BP

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877088] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img which is required with the default zipl.conf

2020-12-17 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu) Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877088] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img which is required with the default zipl.conf

2020-12-04 Thread Stefan Bader
Could someone try to put the attached script into /etc/kernel/postinst.d and let me know whether that make installkernel work? Thanks. ** Attachment added: "Copy to /etc/kernel/postinst.d/xx-update-initrd-links" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1877088/+attachment/5441

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896249] [NEW] lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-gkeop-5.4 5.4.0-1001.1

2020-09-18 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/l/lxc/20200918_144021_ce0b3@/log.gz The failed test is: FAIL: lxc-tests: lxc-test-device-add-remove (0s) --- Adding /dev/ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-28 Thread Stefan Bader
The ADT failures related to lubreswan and ubuntu-fan were resolved by re-try. The systemd test fails somewhere in the upstream test but does not give any hints about which part of that section was considered a failure. The amd64 re-try has now succeeded and from the timing it feels like the failure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Test build of proposed change at: https://launchpad.net/~smb/+archive/ubuntu/bionic ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~smb/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+git/iproute2/+merge/387837 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-22 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: + [SRU Justification] + + Impact: The tc command does not show the correct values for tcp_flags + (and ip_tos) on filter rules. This might break other scripts parsing + that output but at least confuses users. + + Fix: Backport of "tc: fix bugs for tcp_flags and ip_attr h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Oh, so the upstream patch had the test case all the time and I just blanked it, looking at the content there and visible comments in this bug report only. :/ Thanks for the pointer. That should be all needed and I can go on with the SRU process. ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Statu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-21 Thread Stefan Bader
Sorry this seems to have gotten list in translation. I already got the one patch fixed up. What I need is some generic instructions to check the result. Can one just use any pair of NICs or do they have to be special? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-15 Thread Stefan Bader
I would like to verify any changes before moving ahead with SRU. But the given instructions are incomplete or at least not generically usable. Could the instructions be updated with steps that can be performed in a generic VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-15 Thread Stefan Bader
I believe the mention pre-req patch is actually wrong (or not quite the patch we would be looking for). Instead commit 6e8634eb13f30c58d1e28d975d99509680e1abc3 Author: Roman Mashak Date: Thu Mar 29 18:12:35 2018 -0400 tc: add oneline mode Add initial support for oneline mode in tc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873961] Re: tc filter show tcp_flags wrong mask value

2020-07-15 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862169] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in build_flavored_key()

2020-02-28 Thread Stefan Bader
Confirmed to be fixed. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grilo-plugins in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862169 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in build_flavored_key() Status in grilo-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1837235] Re: systemd 229-4ubuntu21.22 ADT test failure with linux 4.4.0-156.183 (storage)

2019-07-23 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642514] Re: sched: Match-all classifier is missing in xenial

2019-04-16 Thread Stefan Bader
** Description changed: + [SRU Justification] + + == Impact == + The Xenial 4.4 kernel already has a patch applied which implements the matchall filter. But in order to actually use it, iproute2 needs to pick up the user-space + side of the implementation. + + == Fix == + Backported a patch fr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642514] Re: sched: Match-all classifier is missing in xenial

2019-04-04 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806532] Re: The line-out on the Dell Dock station can't work

2019-01-09 Thread Stefan Bader
** No longer affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Cosmic) ** Also affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-oem (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Statu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805978] Re: ubuntu_lxc test is failed with lxc-utils package not installed

2018-12-07 Thread Stefan Bader
@Stéphane, isn't that the way Britney works? There will always be one package from proposed which is triggering ADT and the rest is non- proposed. Or was there more than one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1786574] Re: remove i2c-i801 from blacklist

2018-09-18 Thread Stefan Bader
I did prepare some slightly modified proposal for this and will try to get things progressing tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786574 Title: remove i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1786574] Re: remove i2c-i801 from blacklist

2018-09-17 Thread Stefan Bader
I did prepare some slightly modified proposal for this and will try to get things progressing tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786574 Title: remove i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1762385] Re: dell_wmi: Unknown key codes

2018-08-30 Thread Stefan Bader
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kai-Heng Feng (kaihengfeng) ** No longer affects: systemd (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1789431] Re: ip rule show has unexpected space in destination prefix

2018-08-28 Thread Stefan Bader
Fix proposal submitted upstream: https://marc.info/?l=linux- netdev&m=153546645305223&w=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789431 Title: ip rule show has u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1789431] [NEW] ip rule show has unexpected space in destination prefix

2018-08-28 Thread Stefan Bader
example the route_with_policy test of netplan.io. Testcase: ip rule add from 10.1.0.0/24 to 10.2.0.0/24 lookup 99 ip rule show Expected: *: from 10.1.0.0/24 to 10.2.0.0/24 lookup 99 Actual output: *: from 0.1.0.0/24 to 10.2.0.0 /24 lookup 99 ** Affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Hi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1775442] [NEW] systemd 237-3ubuntu10 ADT test failure with linux-gcp 4.15.0-1009.9

2018-06-06 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/s/systemd/20180606_154452_00599@/log.gz ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system

2018-04-24 Thread Stefan Bader
The kernel fix for this arrived in Xenial/16.04 via upstream stable v4.4.125. ** Also affects: laptop-mode-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1758366] Re: network-manager 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-38.43

2018-03-23 Thread Stefan Bader
test_wpa2_ip4 (__main__.ColdplugWifi) WPA2, 802.11g, IPv4 ... ok test_wpa2_ip6 (__main__.ColdplugWifi) WPA2, 802.11g, IPv6 with only RA ... ok test_auto_detect_ap (__main__.Hotplug) new AP is being detected automatically within 30s ... expected failure test_auto_detect_eth (__main__.Hotplug) new et

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1758366] [NEW] network-manager 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-38.43

2018-03-23 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/n/network-manager/20180323_105026_adff0@/log.gz ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1746463] Re: apparmor profile load in stacked policy container fails

2018-03-19 Thread Stefan Bader
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- artful' to 'verification-done-artful'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verifica

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1746463] Re: apparmor profile load in stacked policy container fails

2018-03-14 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Artful) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746463 Title: apparmor profile load in stac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1734344] Re: systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-18.21

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Bader
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1748398 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748398 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1748398 systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch see

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748398] Re: systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Bader
On amd64 this looks to be a race between creating disk partitions and having usable devnodes created by udev (wait, check?): DeviceBoot StartEnd Sectors Size Id Type /dev/loop12p12048 800767 798720 390M 83 Linux /dev/loop12p2 800768 819199 184329M 83 Linux The p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748398] Re: systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Bader
On s390x the test case still(!) does not handle the fact that there is no grub used: autopkgtest [18:29:24]: test systemd-fsckd: [--- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/autopkgtest.L6HMaj/build.kLb/src/debian/tests/systemd-fsckd", line 267, in boot_with_syste

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748398] [NEW] systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: * amd4: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/s/systemd/20180207_192259_e5f4f@/log.gz * s390x: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a7

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2018-02-05 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: ubuntu-fan (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227 Title: replacement of ifupdown with netpl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2018-01-31 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: ubuntu-fan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-fan (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-fan (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729145] Re: /dev/bcache/by-uuid links not created after reboot

2018-01-23 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729145 Title: /dev/bcache/by-uuid links not cre

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1734344] Re: systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-18.21

2017-11-24 Thread Stefan Bader
The s390x failure is because tests now run in a VM and on s390x there is no grub (zipl is used as the boot loader). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734344 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1734344] [NEW] systemd 234-2ubuntu12.1 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-18.21

2017-11-24 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/s/systemd/20171123_190248_4f60f@/log.gz s390x: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a8492

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1731467] Re: Cannot pair BLE remote devices when using combo BT SoC

2017-11-20 Thread Stefan Bader
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Zesty) Importa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1731467] Re: Cannot pair BLE remote devices when using combo BT SoC

2017-11-15 Thread Stefan Bader
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1623125] Re: fixrtc script does not catch "Last mount time: n/a" string

2017-09-06 Thread Stefan Bader
signee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623125 Title: fixrtc script does not catch "Last mount time: n/a"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696981] Re: fixrtc is ineffective when there is no battery for the RTC

2017-09-06 Thread Stefan Bader
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1623125 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623125 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1623125 fixrtc script does not catch "Last mount time: n/a" string -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696981] Re: fixrtc is ineffective when there is no battery for the RTC

2017-09-06 Thread Stefan Bader
Looking at the complete fixrtc-mount script (the part which was fixed in bug #1623125 makes me think that this would fix your problem as well. And that with much less required change. That script checks not only mount but also create time of the fs. If create time is more recent than mount time,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696981] Re: fixrtc is ineffective when there is no battery for the RTC

2017-09-05 Thread Stefan Bader
@Alfonso, right, but the details about what exactly failed is quite important/useful information. If some certificates are deemed invalid on boot until there is network this does not sound too bad at first. If this causes services to not start, then this becomes more important to fix. Also wonde

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696981] Re: fixrtc is ineffective when there is no battery for the RTC

2017-09-05 Thread Stefan Bader
I was reviewing the latest patch and beside of this part being modified (@Ogra, would you be fine with that? And btw Jan 1 2017 is a Saturday), I am not fully understanding what exactly looking at file dates gains. The date will be less wrong but still potentially off by days. The system date wo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703640] Re: nplan and libnss-resolve should be in same dependency

2017-07-13 Thread Stefan Bader
Network file was still the override I had from when RA was causing problems. Same results after removal and re-applying netplan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703640] Re: nplan and libnss-resolve should be in same dependency

2017-07-13 Thread Stefan Bader
Release: Artful/17.10 Manually removed libnss-resolve to simulate the result of only having installed ubuntu-minimal (netplan configured with networkd as renderer). 1) Actual result is that /etc/resolv.conf is empty (except for comments). 2) systemctl status systemd-resolved * systemd-resolved.s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703882] [NEW] systemd-networkd does not pick up dns-search from DHCP

2017-07-12 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: When using networkd as renderer for netplan the nameserver gets set via DHCP but the search list is not picked up. This did work with ifupdown: ubuntu@bar-zesty6401:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces ... # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp ubuntu@bar-z

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703640] Re: nplan and libnss-resolve should be in same dependency

2017-07-11 Thread Stefan Bader
That would be the sane thing, however... Practically, without libnss- resolve installed "systemd-resolve --status" returns an error about some DBUS element and whether it is because of that or something else not properly checked, you end up with nothing in /etc/resolv.conf and thus without any DNS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-07-06 Thread Stefan Bader
Finally found a work-around that also proves the failure to become configured is caused by that stupid ipv6ll address added to the DNS server list. But I did not find any way which integrates into netplan. I basically took /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-br0.network and copied it as /etc/systemd/ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-07-06 Thread Stefan Bader
So that link local is from a Wireless AP that runs open-wrt. But why it is picked up and how can I stop this madness? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697730

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-07-06 Thread Stefan Bader
Started to bring up real HW with the same woes and timeout on boot. After some more cursing and faffing around I realized an odd element of the resulting setup: There is some weird ipv6 link local address for DNS server: fe80::c66e:1fff:fe3b:bdcd. It is the same for the VM doing dhcp and for real

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
So from what Steve wrote and what I see. the missing part is moving from "Gained IPv6LL" to "Configured". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697730 Title: Lon

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
@Ryan: 2: eth0 Link File: /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link Network File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network Type: ether State: routable (configuring) Path: xen-vif-0 Driver: vif HW Address: 00:16:3e:71:31:57 (Xensource, In

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
Hm, maybe that helps. This is the contents of /run/systemd/netif/links/2 (which is my eth0): # This is private data. Do not parse. ADMIN_STATE=configuring OPER_STATE=routable NETWORK_FILE=/run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network DNS=192.168.2.1 fe80::c66e:1fff:fe3b:bdcd NTP= DOMAINS= ROUTE_DOM

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
@Steve, eth0 is normal when you use Xen HVM guests. What I see when I strace the wait command is that is is in some epoll most of the time. That was the reason I was thinking that maybe it is waiting on some status change. But then I also believe it did find two entries in /run/systemd/netif/links

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
Sorry, forgot above: #> cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network [Match] Name=eth0 [Network] DHCP=ipv4 [DHCP] RouteMetric=100 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
Here the netcat config. Note only eth0 appearing here (for KVM guests, the same happens but with ensX NIC names). ** Attachment added: "01-netcfg.yaml" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1697730/+attachment/4895673/+files/01-netcfg.yaml -- You received this bug notificati

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
I created the directory and rebooted once ;) Here is the tarball. ** Attachment added: "journal.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1697730/+attachment/4895674/+files/journal.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-14 Thread Stefan Bader
@Steve, yes it does. And if the wait is related to the list of NICs from ifquery, it does make sense (in some way) as that list only contains "lo", not "eth0". Also "ifquery --state eth0" does not return anything while it does return "lo=lo" for "lo". -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] Re: Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-13 Thread Stefan Bader
#> ifquery --list lo #> ip link show 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:16:3e:71:31:57 brd ff:ff:f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697730] [NEW] Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wait-online.service failure

2017-06-13 Thread Stefan Bader
Public bug reported: Fresh VM installation from the Artful daily server ISO. Installation finishes without issues but booting the installed system takes a long time (until systemd-networkd-wait-online.service times out). The VM can already be pinged at that stage, so network has been configured at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1660832] Re: unix domain socket cross permission check failing with nested namespaces

2017-03-30 Thread Stefan Bader
Not fixed because we had to revert the commits due to various regressions. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645037] Re: apparmor_parser hangs indefinitely when called by multiple threads

2017-03-30 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645037 Title: apparmor_parser hangs indefinit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661030] Re: regession tests failing after stackprofile test is run

2017-03-30 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661030 Title: regession tests failing after s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645037] Re: apparmor_parser hangs indefinitely when called by multiple threads

2017-03-28 Thread Stefan Bader
Not fixed because we had to revert the commits due to various regressions. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648143] Re: tor in lxd: apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_onexec" namespace="root//CONTAINERNAME_" profile="unconfined" name="system_tor"

2017-03-28 Thread Stefan Bader
Not fixed because we had to revert the commits due to various regressions. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661030] Re: regession tests failing after stackprofile test is run

2017-03-28 Thread Stefan Bader
Not fixed because we had to revert the commits due to various regressions. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-17 Thread Stefan Bader
Prepared a patch and sent to the kernel-team mailing list. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673350 Title: dm-queue-length module is not included in

  1   2   >