ubuntu@sru-jammy:~$ python3
Python 3.10.12 (main, Nov 20 2023, 15:14:05) [GCC 11.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/null
ubuntu@sru-focal:~$ python3
Python 3.8.10 (default, Nov 22 2023, 10:22:35)
[GCC 9.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/nul
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gpgme1.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/0.96.20.13 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/0.96.20.13 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Alexsander, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.140ubuntu13.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello Alexsander, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
The verification of the Stable Release Update for network-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Test
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gstreamer1.0 has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encoun
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glib2.0 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.72.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kdesu into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdesu/5.92.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
The patch looks reasonable (assuming that it doesn't change ABI, which
seems to be the case). Could you be able to update the bug with the
necessary SRU information (the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template can help
here)?
Particularly, the [Test Plan] and [Where problems
Public bug reported:
This is low-risk, as we have no reverse-dependencies in the archive.
This bumps some SONAMEs (libmiral4 -> libmiral5, libmircore1 ->
libmircore2, libmiroil1 -> libmiroil2).
The autopkgtest (checking conformance against in-archive wlcs) passes.
* New upstream release 2.9.0
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fwupd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/1.8.3-1~22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Viraniac, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-initramfs-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/0.49~24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello klo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
Hello John, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Hello Georgia, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello Xavier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Public bug reported:
The python-apt 2.7.7ubuntu2 update has a versioned dependency on libapt-
pkg6.0t64 (>= 2.8.1) (on armhf only). Presumably there's an armhf-only
symbols difference resulting in the armhf package (and *only* the armhf
package - none of i386, amd64, ppc64el, s390x, or riscv64 are
I've set the phasing of python-apt to 0.
Now, of course, we have the most annoying kind of regression to untangle
- any rebuild of python-apt in -proposed will *also* exhibit this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
Ok. So, as far as I can tell, python3-apt on armhf *and only* on armhf
gets a versioned dependency on libapt-pkg6.0t64 (>=
$THE_VERSION_IT_BUILT_AGAINST). It's unclear to me what is causing this
behaviour; the symbols file for that library in the apt source looks
unremarkable, and there's no weird
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted directx-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-
headers/1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
I know it doesn't have any rdepends in the archive, but this includes a
libdrm-tegra0 ABI break without bumping SONAME; what sort of consumers
of libdrm-tegra0 are likely to exist? What risk mitigations could we
implement?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-
headers/1.6.1+1.3.216.0-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing thi
spirv-headers is build-depended on by several packages; could we do
test-rebuilds of those as a part of verification, please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991
Right, but as far as the archive is concerned, libdrm-tegra0 itself is
unused :)
What code *does* use libdrm-tegra0, and how sure are we that it doesn't
use those symbols (even accidentally)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
llvm-toolchain-15 will presumably need to be promoted to main in jammy-
proposed/-updates, yes? I'm not familiar with the process of backporting
NEW packages into main; presumably because it's in main in lunar that'll
be ok, but I'd like to check with the MIR team that my assumption is
correct.
--
I'm going to go ahead and mark this as block-proposed-bionic so I don't
keep checking this :).
Please ping in #ubuntu-release if this actually needs to be released to
users.
** Tags added: block-proposed-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seede
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libnl3 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
I'm not sure Argyll is going to be MIR-able; could we instead demote
colord-sensor-argyll to universe?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to colord in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003833
Title:
colord
Hello rdratlos, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cyrus-sasl2 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-
sasl2/2.1.27+dfsg2-3ubuntu1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
The kinetic sbuild autopkgtest regression *looks* to be a real regression to me
- having a bit of a look, it seems mmdebstrap is checking the apt version
against
```
$content =~ /^apt ([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)[a-z0-9]* \([a-z0-9-]+\)$/m
```
while this SRU has version string "apt 2.5.3ubuntu0.1 (a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libmbim has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cyrus-sasl2 has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pango1.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apparmor has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apparmor has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libunwind has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
(SRU team member): It's not entirely clear to me what the status of this
bug is? It's marked as verification-done and all the autopkgtests are
clear, but there's a lot of “it doesn't work” chatter. Let's see if I
can summarise:
Werner seems to be seeing a hanging problem with 249.11-0ubuntu3.11.
L
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
Retriggered the autopkgtest to use the correct apparmor version; let's
see if that fixes things.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Clicking a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Ah, jbicha had already retriggered the autopkgtests, and they now pass.
Huzzah!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Clicking a hyperlink in a PD
The verification of the Stable Release Update for iputils has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
It's a little weird that you're folding two patches into a single patch,
but looks ok. Please do update the bug description!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204001
The focal and groovy autopkgtest failures in apt-clone look suspiciously
like real regressions. Do we have an analysis of those?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rtl8812au has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssl has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssl has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-online-accounts into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-online-accounts/3.36.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-online-accounts into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-online-accounts/3.36.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
The verification of the Stable Release Update for evolution-data-server
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that y
The verification of the Stable Release Update for evolution-data-server
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that y
Hey Seb! This is a candidate for release into -updates, but I don't
think we can do that while it supersedes any package in Groovy.
I understand that the Desktop team has constrained resources. The SRU
team intends to propose a policy change to help, but for now could you
please do a Groovy upload
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tzdata has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
Yeeah, ok.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959375
Title:
[SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"
Status in shadow package in Ubuntu:
The verification of the Stable Release Update for shadow has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for lxd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk+3.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Yeah, ok.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913775
Title:
Copy from Firefox Wayland fails to be pasted anywhere else
Status in GTK+:
Unknown
Status in gtk
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gdb into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
The gdb upload looks fine; I presume it wants to be marked block-
proposed, though?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite
For SRU verification we require that the actual package from the
-proposed archive is tested. This is to avoid the chance that the patch
is mis-applied in the package uploaded to the archive, or that the
archive build environment differs in a way that affects the patch.
We'll also need this to be
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gdb has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
Public bug reported:
I recently rebooted my laptop, and couldn't unlock my (cryptsetup-
managed) root filesystem; after entering my passphrase, the plymouth
prompt would always say “unable to unlock /dev/nvme0n1p3_crypt”.
Dropping to text mode, I can see that cryptsetup is failing with a message
Are you guaranteed to be able to know the set of architecture(s) of
libgcc_s needed? That's what's prevented me from suggesting a patch like
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
http
Ok. So it seems that the bug *exists* in Focal, so now we just need to
verify that the bug is *fixed* by the proposed package.
@angie78 - as you seem to suffer from the bug, can you try to verify
that the proposed packages (from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1782984/comment
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gstreamer1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-good1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-base1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-bad1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
That seems like we should be able to extract a verification from the
errors.ubuntu.com results. Is it possible to query crashes with a
specific dependency version? Seeing no crash reports with libx11
2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.3 would suggest this is fixed.
On the other hand,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enco
Has anyone tried PCManFM or Inkscape on focal? It seems that this update
doesn't fix GNOME Shell on focal, but *maybe* that's because Shell is
hitting a different bug?
If this can be verified to fix PCManFM, Inkscape, or something on focal
we can release it and open a new bug for GNOME Shell on Fo
Hm. It's not clear what the actual user impact of this is?
Reading from the original description, it seems that if a user uses an
invalid label to set one address and *also* uses a valid label to set
another address *then* tools can be confused?
“Our parser is actually more lenient than the manpa
Ok. For clarity, my understanding of these patches are that they do the
following things:
1) Add a feature to ModemManager to support uploading firmware to these modems
2) Increase a timeout that was found to be insufficient when doing a firmware
update
3) Add a bunch of mappings from SIM->Carrie
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsync has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
@Timo: I notice the libdrm backport drops the valgrind integration. I
know it's disabled in (at least) impish, but is there any particular
reason for it to be disabled in the focal backport?
It seems pretty unlikely that anyone would notice, but the diff required
to keep the valgrind annotations e
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.5 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Well, that's a compelling reason.
** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553
Title:
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
