with this that would
make this less than trivial, but I think its entirely doable, at least in
simple form, and would certainly make plugin installation easier.
See http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/3347
Jeff Hammel
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:58:02AM +0300
Does using different components not suit your need? Otherwise, you'll need
someting like TracForge that is handles multi-projects this way.
jeff
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:01:47PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to use a single project but have tickets grouped into
logical
I wrote a plugin without really realizing some of what I've done was duplicate
effort here. Maybe this will work for you?
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TicketSubmitPolicyPlugin
It works with trac 0.11rc1. It is not exhaustively tested though I'm committed
to fixing bugs and will entertain
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracUpgrade
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:20:38PM -0700, Ronald wrote:
How can I update trac in a production enviroment?
There is some procedure that should I follow?
!DSPAM:4014,485027c8226655332866982!
The example you gave worksforme (Trac 0.11rc1). Are you enclosing your lists
in {{{}}}s ? If so, don't.
jeff
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Hello!
How do I create an ordered list on a Trac 0.11dev wiki page?
On
On Thu, June 5, 2008 22:01, thinktwice wrote:
[intertrac]
t = site1 site1.title = mysite1 site1.url = http://mysite1
how to add another trac sites here?
just do this for each site you want:
[intertrac]
site1.title = mysite1
site1.url = http://mysite1
site2.title = mysite2
site2.url =
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:52:43PM -0700, Chris wrote:
I may need to apply that patch later if I encounter the problem in the
ticket, but that was not my issue. However I did find out why it was
not working for me. I didn't catch this note on the BatchModifyPlugin
wiki page previously.
[
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:28:16PM -0400, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
Jeff Hammel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:52:43PM -0700, Chris wrote:
I may need to apply that patch later if I encounter the problem in the
ticket, but that was not my issue. However I did find out why
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:21:18AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
considering all the plugins that try to hide, extend, modify or play
with the custom properties of a ticket, and also reading through the
resent discussion about the trac core I have a simple question to
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:17:46PM -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
Macbane wrote:
Hi,
I have read some of the proposals, for multi project trac. How do
people feel about it, because trac is fine for a small project but
breaks down when you get to a stage where you are working on many
My intention was not to obviate the need for ticket types, with custom
fields, workflow, etc. attached to a type (I was not intending to do
ticket types). I think there is a clear need for them, with one default
type where trac would perform identically as now, but for more types it
would become
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:00:48PM -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Thomas Moschny
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:48 AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
