Thomas Moschny wrote:
2008/6/2, Jeff Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For what its worth from a first time mailer to this list, I am glad trac does
not import its wiki pages into an svn repo by default. For my mileage, this
would be clunkier (but I'm sure I have different wiki needs than others).
2008/6/2, Jeff Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For what its worth from a first time mailer to this list, I am glad trac does
not import its wiki pages into an svn repo by default. For my mileage, this
would be clunkier (but I'm sure I have different wiki needs than others).
It is not clear to me
2008/6/3, Noah Kantrowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Clunkiness is not the issue, we do not wish to require Subversion in order
to use Trac.
Subversion is of course not the only option. There might be cases
however where someone does not have a repository at all, but still
wants to use Trac for
Hi Noah,
Clunkiness is not the issue, we do not wish to require Subversion in
order to use Trac. It is better to reinvient a bit of the wheel in 100
lines of code, than force you to install a much much larger package
(plus its deps, etc). There is also the issue that Trac supports other
Check both into subversion and use that (or git, hg, etc). A wiki is not
designed for that kind of complex document management.
--Noah
From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Duany Espindola
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:08 AM
To:
: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:30 AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki pages - not a collision solution
Thank you too, but
I think this solution not works for me because the TRAC wiki pages are
not text files.
For view this pages in text files we need do
Thank you Noah!
I will do this using svn or diff and patch commands.
I think more people have de same problem that I have. Maybe I make a plug-in
when I take a vacation.
Att
Duany César (Brazil)
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Noah Kantrowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check both into
: Merge wiki pages – not a collision solution
Thank you too, but
I think this solution not works for me because the TRAC wiki pages are
not text files.
For view this pages in text files we need do a export command.
I want know if a plug-in could do that, something like
AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki pages - not a collision solution
Thank you Noah!
I will do this using svn or diff and patch commands.
I think more people have de same problem that I have. Maybe I make a plug-in
when I take a vacation.
Att
Duany César (Brazil
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki pages - not a collision solution
Thank you too, but
I think this solution not works for me because the TRAC wiki pages are
not text files.
For view this pages in text files we need do a export command.
I want know if a plug
On Jun 2, 12:35 pm, Duany Espindola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you Noah!
I will do this using svn or diff and patch commands.
I think more people have de same problem that I have. Maybe I make a plug-in
when I take a vacation.
Att
Duany César (Brazil)
snip
vacation? I thought that
-Original Message-
From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Thomas Moschny
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:48 AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki pages - not a collision solution
2008/6/2, Noah Kantrowitz [EMAIL
2008/6/2, Noah Kantrowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Check both into subversion and use that (or git, hg, etc). A wiki is not
designed for that kind of complex document management.
rantWell, if Trac stored the wiki contents within the repository
[1], it could even support such 'complex' tasks. Ikiwiki
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:00:48PM -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Thomas Moschny
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:48 AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki
14 matches
Mail list logo
