Hi Dorioo,
Here are the results of our performance comparisons.
Firstly the disclaimer, I am not trying to bag out MM here, he has
done a great job on Transfer.
We run a large Transfer/Mach-II/Coldspring app (3.6k lines of Transfer
XML config). We have run into the typical memory issues that
Thank you for sharing and for being so detailed.
- Gabriel
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dorioo,
Here are the results of our performance comparisons.
Firstly the disclaimer, I am not trying to bag out MM here, he has
done a great job on Transfer.
I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects to be loaded from
the DB (ie, cache exhaustion).
I suspect this is due to the fact that transfer has some custom code
for CF8, and treating is CF9 as CF7. MM confirmed this
please post results. Thank you
- Gabriel
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects to be loaded from
the DB (ie, cache exhaustion).
I suspect
The performance issue re: transfer treating cf9 as cf7 has been fixed
in the plugable cache branche.
Mark
Sent from my phone
On 2/7/10, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects
Brian,
I'm sure I won't be the only to say it depends here ;-) That said,
as far as ballparks and gut feels go, I'd say that Railo and CF9 are
both significantly faster than CF8, all around.
I had a Model-Glue/ColdSpring/Transfer app running on a CentOS VPS
with CF8/JRun and 512 MB RAM and it
Railo express ships with Resin as the packaged app server. Ancedotally
I have heard that Resin is definitely up there in terms of being one
of the fastest app servers.
Resin by Caucho: http://www.caucho.com/
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Brian G brian-goo...@vfive.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 12:35
Aaahhh. A man after my own heart. :-)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Jamie Krug wrote:
or find me at the bar :)
--
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message
Awesome. Thx Mark!
On Sep 24, 6:10 pm, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Only the version of Transfer in SVN will work with CF9.
Mark
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:38 AM, rayvarner@gmail.com
rayvarner@gmail.com wrote:
I recently installed cf9 beta and ran into an issue
(General)
From: transfer-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:transfer-...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mark Mandel
Sent: 27 July 2009 22:31
To: transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [transfer-dev] Re: CF9 and ORM
James, Thanks for bringing this up.
Hibernate is a *crazy* good product
Alternatively, has anyone given considering to turning transfer into a
wrapper about CF9's inbuilt hibernate support to allow a migration
path?
That would be tricky, considering they work in some pretty significantly
different ways, including but not limited to configuration.
Although I
James, Thanks for bringing this up.
Hibernate is a *crazy* good product, and is miles above and beyond
Transfer's capabilities. In my opinion, the implementation in CF9 has been
done *exceedingly* well. The only detractor being that your are tied to a
single datasource (which I'm sure people
@Mark: Thanks for letting us know where you stand - it's great to hear
that Transfer won't be neglected. You've done a brilliant job in
developing such a useful product. All the best for the future!
Cheers
Matthew
On Jul 28, 7:31 am, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
James, Thanks for
Both currently on 1.6.0_14
Dave
On Jul 27, 9:50 am, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
What JVM is being used on each version?
Mark
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
Testing environment is a local machine, dual core, 512mb JVM,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering what the plans are for transfer in relation to CF9.
The SVN version of Transfer will work on CF9. CF9 didn't like the usage of
the method 'throw()' very much.
We are currently looking to move our
15 matches
Mail list logo
