Our local Tech site mikrobitti.fi published an article headlining "RMS in
trouble defends Epstein – the girls were all willing.
They "fixed" the text after receiving critical negative feedback about
misrepresentation but the falsehoods are still in the headline.
This a thousand times over! The apparent crime he did was to even question
the structure of the legal system. That is still taboo it appears.
The reports contain distortions and falsehoods. I urge people to read what he
actually wrote (the full unedited thing and not just quotes from places in
order to see the things in their full context) and think about it.
> I'd like to know if anyone here has any idea what they're referring to?
Hard to say, but he has said a lot of really wild stuff in his life. But,
he's always been a provocateur, who views part of his purpose as challenging
people on the words they use and on the way those word choices
tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
From that page:
When considered with other reprehensible comments he has published over
the years, these incidents form a pattern of behavior that is
incompatible with the goals of the free
Hey Calm,
I haven't used Trisquel in a little bit and when I saw this story, I wanted
to see what y'all were up to.
I would agree, but we do need someone to fill at least some of the void if
not better. Someone who has much trustworthiness as Jxself or better if
possible.
This! I had thought about saying maybe six hours. And yes, its not only not a
bad idea, he does seem to know quite a bit about how to handle the situation
of free software.
That being said, I only said nothing for so long, because Stallman's
situation deserved I thought some time before we
As sad as I am that it's come to this, I can't really say that I'm surprised.
Even though I agree with RMS on many, if not most things, I've always found
him to be pretty unconventional, and can easily see how others find him
totally controversial. It was only a matter of time. However,
I just want to point out that this didn't come out of thin air:
https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794
RMS has been saying things like this for years, and only now he's being held
accountable. It's about time. He's had so many chances to change already over
the
hey Beko, what's the easiest way to install Gnome?
When are you going to add a desktop screenshot to our thread in the troll
lounge?
Well i kind of doubt Stallman doesn't speak for the free software movement. I
just think he isn't the only person to speak for it. That's all...
But yeah, T3g don't get me wrong, I have no idea why, but I missed your
foolishness. Just like I missed Jodiendo.
meh, if this is trolling, well
Hey, I wondered, where you have been t3g.
I didn't expect you appear at this time.
But yeah, careful with your links, it could be used to potential destroy the
fsf. and that would be dangerous to freedom as a whole.
>
I nominate jxself for president of the FSF. I've always enjoyed his
commentary and viewpoints on free software.
me to
Yeah, the people jumping at the chance to throw RMS under the bus is worrying
me. I dislike his stances on many things, and think that he is very
anti-freedom on a lot of issues. But as for software, I look at him as kinda
like a founding father. I'm worried that with statements like "RMS
Then, please use this mailing list for its scope.
Join to an "individuals debate" list to talk about the good and the bad
of somebody that is not subscribed here. (and invite him)
El 17/9/19 a les 19:45, commodore...@gmail.com ha escrit:
> Everybody in the free software movement speaks for free
Everybody in the free software movement speaks for free software as
individuals.
Without Stallman there would be no free software movement. In the 80s people
were suing each other into oblivion over shareware. As a result of the
lawsuits, Stallman came up with the idea of copy left and created the GPL.
But left to their own devices and without Stallman's vision and
On 17/09/19 18:28, wrote:
> https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
First time ever I hear from these people.
--
Ignacio Agulló · grafot...@grafotema.com
On 09/17/2019 12:04 PM, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> The "Nobody lasts forever" thread already was off-topic.
Speaking of that, whatever happened to freedom-misc?
--
Caleb Herbert
KE0VVT
816-892-9669
https://bluehome.net/csh
<>
The "Nobody lasts forever" thread already was off-topic.
Please, stop this subject to not deploy unuseful discussion.
El 17/9/19 a les 18:28, tegskywal...@hotmail.com ha escrit:
> https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
Its a micro of all the infighting happening right now in the world. good news
is free software will always exists as long as ppl can give things away for
free.
publickey - davidpgil@protonmail.com - 0x01EB3346.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
This in-fighting scares me very much.
<>
On 09/17/2019 11:18 AM, superbyel...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Just so the Free Software Foundation doesn't go the way of the Linux
> Foundation.
>
> I nominate jxself for president of the FSF. I've always enjoyed his
> commentary and viewpoints on free software.
I never thought about jxself, but I
I just had a peek at SFConservancys page on Twitter about this. So many
trolls... My eyes are bleeding.
On 09/17/2019 08:13 AM, ja...@bluehome.net wrote:
> The FSF is now less for having lost RMS.
I will miss him greatly. I wish I could help. The man lost his job and
everything. It's terrible.
--
Caleb Herbert
KE0VVT
816-892-9669
https://bluehome.net/csh
<>
https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
I second that. I think we need someone at least as dedicated and knowledgeable
and jxself.
My fear is that some bad actor will come in and take the reigns. I really hope
that we are able to carry the ball going forward from here.
publickey - davidpgil@protonmail.com - 0x01EB3346.asc
Just so the Free Software Foundation doesn't go the way of the Linux
Foundation.
I nominate jxself for president of the FSF. I've always enjoyed his
commentary and viewpoints on free software.
Like Prometheus' gift of fire, RMS' gift of free software will now be carried
on by mere mortals. I hope that the FSF will continue to do great work.
My heart stopped for a moment. I thought he had passed... I hope there will be
a new worthy successor if that is even possible.
publickey - davidpgil@protonmail.com - 0x01EB3346.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am unhappy for this and I am agree with jxself.
The FSF is now less for having lost RMS.
On 9/17/19, ma...@masonhock.com wrote:
> whereas there is only one Snap Store,
> controlled by Canonical.
Ah, yes, I forgot that point. Thanks for reminding me, Mason.
The Free Software Foundation has announced that Richard Stallman has
resigned as president, and also from its board of directors.
There are many capable people on the FSF than can continue
Richard's work, but for sure we will miss his enlightened steering.
Richard M. Stallman resigns
> Isn't this installer wizard FOSS?
> This it could be ported to any Debian derivative distro.
Sure, it's easier when it comes directly from upstream, but not
necessary.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
El 17/9/19 a les 1:27, ma...@masonhock.com ha escrit:
> Ubuntu also has some
> advantages, like a more user-friendly installer
Isn't this installer wizard FOSS?
This it could be ported to any Debian derivative distro.
If Canonical is a friend of FOSS community, any enhancement found in
Ubuntu
39 matches
Mail list logo
