Quodlibet is my favourite. Best plugins (especially the equilizer).
Soundcloud Integration. Internet Radio.
https://quodlibet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
> Where is the original amarok accessible?
Found it:
http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-r14.0.0/debian/pool/main/a/amarok-trinity/?C=M;O=A
> Where is the original amarok accessible?
Git links are on the Trinity home page. I just added their repository though
and installed with apt from there:
https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/Category:Documentation#Installing_from_a_Package_Manager
> Is that amarok or amarok 2?
$ amarok --version
Qt: 4.8.7
KDE Development Platform: 4.14.16
Amarok: 2.8.0
> amarok 2 has apparently been depricated and removed from Buster's
> repositories, and original amarok is not available at all from Buster,
> Stretch or Jessie or Sid. I'm running original
> Why would you need to install Trinity? In Trisquel at least, it's just
> $ sudo apt install amarok
> $ amarok # or launch from your DE's menu
Is that amarok or amarok 2? amarok 2 has apparently been depricated and
removed from Buster's repositories, and original amarok is not available at
> I've heard good things about Clementine and Rhythmbox although for now
> I've simply been using VLC Media Player.
If you like text-based interfaces and vim-like keybindings, I recommend
cmus.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> I've recently gotten amarok running by installing the Trinity Desktop
> Environment. Once that's installed, you can invoke amarok from within
> Trinity, or from most other desktops by running
> /opt/trinity/bin/amarokapp from a terminal.
Why would you need to install Trinity? In Trisquel at
I mostly use Audacious and Pragha https://pragha-music-player.github.io/
I've recently gotten amarok running by installing the Trinity Desktop
Environment. Once that's installed, you can invoke amarok from within
Trinity, or from most other desktops by running /opt/trinity/bin/amarokapp
from a terminal.
I see Sayonara's screenshots here
https://sayonara-player.com/features.php and it's pretty interesting
for me. It's Qt-based like Amarok. Thanks for informing, fredo.
I recently tried several music players after some comparison and I ended up
chosing Sayonara Player wich seems a good choice for organizing and listening
a music collection
https://sayonara-player.com/
I searched something light that would let me do that simple tasks
efficiently, without
andyprough, what thread are you referring to?
I bet it could run .ape files too.
mpv uses ffmpeg, so if your installed version of ffmpeg supports Monkey's
audio so will mpv.
Monkey's Audio (*.ape) is not a free-as-in-freedom format.
There are free implementations of Monkey's audio in Rockbox, ffmpeg and a
JAVA one called JMAC (audacious's implementation is probably based on one of
these three). The main issue with the format is high CPU usage while
decoding,
> On an unrelated note, I wonder whatever happened to Supertramp...
I noticed a lot of our frequent commenters became less active once it became
in vogue around here this summer to attack posters over their perceived lack
of free software orthodoxy in every aspect of their lives, and to
Audacious probably did some reverse engineering to make .ape files work.
In my personal opinion though, I use mpv, ever since Supertramp said how
bloat VLC was, I looked at other options and I finally decided on mpv. :)
It works well with website urls too. ;)
I bet it could run .ape files
Does it support .ape files?
I just tested a sample from the site below and it works fine in Hyperbola's
packaged version of audacious.
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/lossless/
Monkey's Audio (*.ape) is not a free-as-in-freedom format. It's highly
recommended that you convert them to FLAC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_formats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey%27s_Audio
Does it support .ape files?
Another thumbs up for Audacious. I switched to it from Rhythmbox when I
update to Etiona (rhythmbox is not built successfully there yet). Audacious
is lighter weight, reliable, no complaints. The only thing I could see is
that the interface with tabbed playlists may be a bit cumbersome
The best thing about Audacious is that it supports an insane amount of audio
formats. I listen to VGM, FLAC, OGG, SPC files and more. Supported!
cmus is a really fun app because it is command-line based with lots of shortcut
keys (need to invest in memorizing) which makes it pretty fast.
If you're asking for a music player, then Audacious is perfect.
Rhythmbox is much more than a music player. I don't wish to let it arrange my
music files.
Audacious and cmus are great.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cmus
I've tried most of the different music players. I always end up back with
VLC. It is not the prettiest, but it has the most functions that I use.
Clementine is probably my second favorite. Very good if you want a lot of
radio stations and want to use a good Amarok fork. cvlc is a good
I use Rhythmbox, it's good if you have meta-data and you want to organize.
You could also use a console based music player, but they're not really up to
my standards the last time I used them and I forgot what that reason was. I
think it was it lists by artist, but I want to list by album
I've heard good things about Clementine and Rhythmbox although for now I've
simply been using VLC Media Player.
26 matches
Mail list logo
