Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-22 Thread jbahn
I have now successfully installed Tor by your instructions. After you spending so much time on it, I am almost embarrassed to say that I did know how to install Tor the 'normal' way. But I didn't know your trick to add it to the menu. I ad to manually make the /bin/ though. Still, I will

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-22 Thread jbahn
This is an easy solution. I believe that the main difference to the solution provided by chaosmonk is that the tar is extracted in a folder on the desktop and no link and icon is created in the menu? Or is there more to it?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-20 Thread enduzzer
No need to "install", I never do. Get the latest Tor-Browser here (portable executable). https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en Extract to ~/Desktop, and launch.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-20 Thread Mason Hock
> Chaosmonk, I am sorry to take too much of your time, and I really > appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot. No problem. I'll look into torbrowser-launcher more if I have the chance, but for now the instructions in my last message should achieve the same thing. (Assuming that you are the only

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-20 Thread jbahn
Chaosmonk, I am sorry to take too much of your time, and I really appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-20 Thread Mason Hock
> E: Unable to locate package python3-gpg This package isn't present in Ubuntu 16.04 or Trisquel 8. I tried several ways of getting it and ran into problems. I can't afford to spend more time on this today. You could ask the dev for build instructions for Ubuntu 16.04, or just do this: $ wget

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-20 Thread jbahn
Thanks. Now I got a little further, but ran into a new problem: ~/Downloads/torbrowser-launcher$ sudo apt install build-essential dh-python python3-all python3-stdeb python3-pyqt5 python3-gpg python3-requests python3-socks gnupg2 tor Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-19 Thread Mason Hock
> but there is no torbrowser-launcher folder to cd to. Make sure that git is installed $ sudo apt install git so that the command is successful. > And from where should I > cd to it? I don't know but is the right question: Where does git clone the > source to? The torbrowser-launcher

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-19 Thread jbahn
Thanks. I have never tried to build from source before so let this be my first try. I already had a beginners problem: According to the guide the first steps are git clone https://github.com/micahflee/torbrowser-launcher.git cd torbrowser-launcher but there is no torbrowser-launcher folder

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-18 Thread Mason Hock
I've found the problem. See here: https://launchpad.net/~micahflee/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages The PPA does not have torbrowser-launcher packaged for Xenial, only Bionic and Cosmic. Since Trisquel 8 is based on Xenial, there's no package available. If I were you I'd build it from source. The

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-18 Thread jbahn
This drives me crazy. As you can see from the screenshot attached above, Micah's PPA is added, registered and recognised by trisquel. It is also shown by ~$ ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d micahflee-ubuntu-ppa-xenial.list But tha PPA seems to be not recognised when I try to install from it: ~$

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-16 Thread Mason Hock
Any error messages or warnings while updating? > ~$ apt search torbrowser-launcher What about "apt policy torbrowser-launcher"? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-16 Thread Mason Hock
> What about "apt policy torbrowser-launcher"? Sorry, just saw your second message. Just run 'apt update' again and watch the output closely to see if there are any errors or warnings. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-16 Thread jbahn
And the policy: ~$ apt policy torbrowser-launcher torbrowser-launcher: Installed: 0.2.4-1 Candidate: 0.2.4-1 Version table: *** 0.2.4-1 500 500 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-16 Thread jbahn
~$ ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d micahflee-ubuntu-ppa-xenial.list It seems to be regignised, but after a an 'apt update' I still get ~$ apt search torbrowser-launcher Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done torbrowser-launcher/flidas,now 0.2.4-1 amd64 [installed] helps download and run the Tor

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-15 Thread Mason Hock
> Version table: > *** 0.2.4-1 500 > 500 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas/main amd64 Okay, indeed the package manager does not find the PPA's version of the package. Based on the screenshot you attached earlier it seems like you really did add the PPA, but run $ ls

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-15 Thread jbahn
~$ apt policy torbrowser-launcher torbrowser-launcher: Installed: 0.2.4-1 Candidate: 0.2.4-1 Version table: *** 0.2.4-1 500 500 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-13 Thread Mason Hock
What is the output of $ apt policy torbrowser-launcher ? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-13 Thread jbahn
Thanks. I got this output: ~$ apt search torbrowser-launcher Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done torbrowser-launcher/flidas,now 0.2.4-1 amd64 [installed] helps download and run the Tor Browser Bundle I suppose it means that the version from the PPA is not accessible somehow? As can be

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-13 Thread jbahn
It seems that the version from the PPA is not even accessible: ~$ apt search torbrowser-launcher Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done torbrowser-launcher/flidas,now 0.2.4-1 amd64 [installed] helps download and run the Tor Browser Bundle

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-07 Thread Mason Hock
> Can the given issue be caused by the same application being present in > both the repo and a PPA? No, The version that is not installed should have no effect on your system. > How can I make sure, that Trisquel installs from the PPA and not the repo? The package manager will default to the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-07 Thread Caleb Herbert
Should I use torbrowser-launcher instead of just downloading it from Tor's website and running it from the archive?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install from PPA rather than repo

2019-01-07 Thread Caleb Herbert
PPAs usually take precedence over the system repos, so the PPA should be what's installed. To check, you can do "apt search torbrowser-launcher" at the command line.  If one of the packages are installed, you should see "[installed]" next to the package listing, like: cal@flexo:~$ apt search