From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
10:52 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
In a message dated 2/12/2005 6:34:03 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECT
Complain to Mr. Webster.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
6:09 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
ftr, anothr near
perfect example of anti-intellectu
In a message dated 2/12/2005 5:28:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They deceive themselves and they will deceive you.
Terry -- I have some experience with gay types as well -- almost none of them were criminals, however. But about the above ain't going to happ
In a message dated 2/12/2005 6:34:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"The intellectuals are coming; the intellectuals are coming !!
There goes the nieghborhood [sic]
Written like a true anti-intellectual.
JD
In a message dated 2/12/2005 7:33:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First off I am not a Church of Christ Cultist
Actually, I see very little difference between your cultish behavior and that of the C of C -- southern division.
Unity is not arrived at by Cult or Evangel
Those within treat like they are without
Those without don't let in your house neither bid them god bless
God obviously puts a wall of separation between believers and unbelievers
First of all heresy and false doctrine are sin also
Titus 1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with
First off I am not a Church of Christ Cultist
Unity is not arrived at by Cult or Evangelical consensus!
As far as a list like I said very simple learned it in Sunday school ( I can have my Sunday chool teacher come over to help you.)
The B I B L E now thats the list for me, I stand alone on the
Be on guard against any tampering with the Word, whether disguised as a search for truth, or a scholarly attempt at apparently hidden meanings; and beware of the confusion created by the senseless rash of new versions, translations, editions, and improvements upon the tried and tested Bible of our
WOW all that to find out that PARTAKE means to UBS Lexicon: metecho -- share in (something) ...
Friberg Lexicon: metecho -- (have a) share in, participate in, partake of, w. the sharing always resulting fr. choosing to participate.
Go Figure !
Bill Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Than
"The intellectuals are coming; the intellectuals are coming !!
There goes the nieghborhood[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary your hatred is thinkly veiled.Of course it is thinkly veiled. Gary, af
In the TRADITION of the Nazi UUberman who called Genocide the "Final Solution"
We now call Sodomites "gay" We've come a long way baby.
Are you for softening the words for Fornication, murder, theft also?
One commandants wife liked to have men who had tattoo's;
skined alive so she coukld have the s
15k that is a biggie!
Just exactly how large is the bandwidth available to TT?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the post--pls help us to reduce both @innglory.org mailbox and bandwidth consumption on your own, without a moderator's remindr--yes, i'm dispensible baby
G
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15
thanks for the post--pls help
us to reduce both @innglory.org mailbox and bandwidth consumption on your
own, without a moderator's remindr--yes, i'm dispensible
baby
G
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:51:06 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Anyone live in a city
worse than
ftr, anothr near
perfect example of anti-intellectualism in a 'knowing w/o
learning' style of intepretation:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:08:48 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
sod·om·ite
(sd-mt)n.
One who
eng
Anyone live in a city worse than this?
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2565409
For the Record
Figure in BYU rape case enters no-contest plea A peripheral defendant in the Brigham Young University rape case has entered a no-contest plea to making false statements to police. Former footb
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
10:33 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECT
J Can we
hear an Amen? Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
9:11 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
This reminds me, I found
sod·om·ite
(sd-mt)
n.
One who engages in
sodomy.
Main Entry: sod·om·ite
Pronunciation: -"mIt
Function: noun
: one who practices sodomy
sodomite
n : someone who engages in anal copulation (especially a male
who engages in anal copula
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:05:26 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jt: Yes - I agree with you -
Jesus was born with a human spirit inside his human body like all humans
have. The difference between him and the rest of us is that he was born
with a human spirit that was alive t
Is this different from what
you are saying above?
Yes, but never mind. I love you, Judy.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 1:13
PM
Subject: Re:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:48:48 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I wrote
> Instead humanity was purified in relationship
with God in Christ's person throughout his life, the tyrants being defeating all along the way, and the
humanity "becoming perfected" in the p
Yes - I agree with you -
Jesus was born with a human spirit inside his human body like all humans
have. The difference between him and the rest of us is that he was born
with a human spirit that was alive to God (with no breach) whereas ours was
dead. Jesus walked in the fullness of the Ho
In a message dated 2/12/2005 11:12:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>"The intellectuals are coming; the intellectuals are coming !!
>
>
=
Woe is us !!
Yes, indeed. That does seem to b
I wrote >
Instead humanity was purified in relationship with God
in Christ's person throughout his life, the tyrants being defeating all along the way, and the humanity
"becoming perfected" in the process of learning obedience to God through the
things he suffered.
jt: How do we learn
Thanks for the answer, David. Why do you think
Jesus did not say, "And for their sakes I give them the example of myself, that
they also may be sanctified by truth"? He said that sort of thing at other
times, but not here. Instead he said, "And for their sakes I
SANCTIFY Myself, that they al
I think the attachment is a Word
Perfect file. I had troubles also. Boyd is 'one of my boys'. I
highly enjoyed 'Repenting of Religion' but most of all find comfort in Boyd's
attempts at understanding suffering and evil (and he is one of the few
Trinitarians who takes on spiritual wa
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:00:03 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
the Radio Bible Class, but he doesn't give his
sources either. It seems like he should have told you (and by extension us) of
the obscurity of his definition for this word.
jt: ... If I were writing about the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"The intellectuals are coming; the intellectuals are coming !!
=
Woe is us !!
"
Bill Taylor wrote:
> Hey, David, would you tell me how you
> interpret Jesus' words in the following
> verses (feel free to draw from a larger
> context if you like)?
>
> John17:17 "Sanctify them by Your truth.
> Your word is truth."
> John 17:19 "And for their sakes I sanctify
> Myself, that they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter and John had a learning curve which effects ppl--the phrase 'were
unlearned' is past tense baby
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:06:54 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
of Peter and John and perceived that they were unlearned and ingnorant
men
===
I think the attachment is a Word Perfect
file. I had troubles also. Boyd is 'one of my boys'. I highly
enjoyed 'Repenting of Religion' but most of all find comfort in Boyd's attempts
at understanding suffering and evil (and he is one of the few
Trinitarians who takes on spiritual warfare)
Judy,
I couldn't get your attachment to open, so didn't
read the review, but I saw that it has to do with Gregory Boyd. Why do you say
that he is one of our "boys" (I assume you include me in this)? Boyd is way
into open theism, which is what Terry and David were discussing a while back --
Big mistake corrected below in BOLD
UPPERCASE!, smaller ones corrected, too.
- Original Message -
From:
Bill Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 11:00
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
Joseph Smith wrote:
>> Nevertheless I fell into transgression and
>> sinned in many things which brought wound
>> upon my Soul [sic] and there were many things
>> which transpired that cannot be writen [sic] and
>> my Fathers [sic] family have suffered many persecutions
>> and afflictions.
Blaine
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 8:02
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:54:21 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAI
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:11:39 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BT: I was just trying to understand why you would
say such things as "Jesus did
not come here as God" and "... so he was not on this earth as
God," that's all. And I still don't understand, for that matter, why
One of Alan Arkin's greatest roles.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 12, 2005 11:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original
Sin
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTEC
In a message dated 2/12/2005 4:32:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(NB:she can't lose 'cause she can't be 'hit')
:-)
In a message dated 2/12/2005 4:37:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what
In a message dated 2/12/2005 4:37:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So ignorant and unlearned does not disqualify anyone who hears the voice of the Chief Shepherd. God is funny like that. He sometimes hides things from the wise and prudent. jt
Actually, Judy, if you would t
In a message dated 2/12/2005 3:09:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary your hatred is thinkly veiled.
Of course it is thinkly veiled. Gary, af all, is a mild mannered intellectual.
JD
"The intellectuals are coming; the intellectuals are coming !! "
g..ites whatever ain't conducive
to stereotypicalization while 'sodomites' has the certain homiletical ring
down the streets and alleys of SLC..the Wyatt Earp effect--ever been to
Tombstone? was it WE or Doc that carried the sawed off
shotgun?
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:35:07 -0600 Terry
C
Peter and John had a learning
curve which effects ppl--the phrase 'were unlearned' is past tense
baby
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:06:54 -0500 Judy
Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
of Peter and John and perceived
that they were unlearned and ingnorant
men
This reminds me, I found the rest of the saying ...
:)
Architects cover their mistakes with paint
Doctors cover their mistakes with sod,
Brides cover their mistakes with mayonaise
Hypocrites cover themselves with ritual
Theologians cover themselves with words
(Should I add Greek ones?)
On F
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:54:21 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Never mind, Judy, I found it. Your statement is
the opinion of a preacher named Dr. DeHaan of the Radio Bible Class,
but he doesn't give his sources either. It seems like he should have told you
(and by
Thanks for the backstory, Terry.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 12, 2005 08:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/11/2005 8:06:00 PM Pacific Standard Ti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that the term 'sodomites', below, includes purveyors of perversions such
as gossip and gluttony reinforces a biblical learning curve, Terry
'sodomite' actually reads as a reference to those who dwelt in Sodom,
where, acc to Scripture, there were numerous/various injustices
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/11/2005 8:06:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about perverts? That should cover the whole filty disgusting bunch.
Terry
Depends on whether you are trying to help them or not. The behavior is ver
A smattering of applause from those who perceived
the choice of 'thinkly' veiled to have been intentional. However Jt's 'deflector
shields' allowed her to remain unscathed by Gary's 'phonton torpedoes'. Now
we're talkin' 'rules of engagement'. (NB:she can't lose 'cause she can't be
'hit')
Kevin's report of JS's words:
"and my Soul was filled with love and for many days I could rejoice with great
joy and the Lord was with me but could find none that would believe the hevenly
vision. . . . Nevertheless I fell into transgression and sinned in many things
which brought wound upon my
BLAINE: Very ineresting account, Kevin. I fully believe everything in it. But
it is just incomplete. Joseph Smith was focusing on his conversation with
Jesus Christ. He simply did not mention in this account the full course of
events. According to the official account, the Father had spok
BLAINE: Who are you to say who was responsible? Joseph had a complex
organization of hundreds of men working under him. It would have been
impossible for errors not to happen. You are, as usual, grabbing at straws.
Besides, you did not even seem to be aware of the difference between the f
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the
Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and
thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what kind of faith you are unified around -
We are free to think and speak whatever we
So, moderation today means jumping in to stir the
pot and to notify all as to whose side you are on, along with identifying
and card filing those in the discussion?. Gary your hatred is thinkly
veiled.
The observations sound familiar though:
"Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and
This is why I like Gary. He and at least three others on this list, is smarter than I. I was thinking that a Sodomite was someone from Sodom but the Professor put it into words better than I could (man, I like being humble !). JD and thanks for the post, G.
In a message dated 2/11/2005
In a message dated 2/11/2005 10:03:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried but the link wouldnât work. Next time.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:20 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.inn
57 matches
Mail list logo
