- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 12:19:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
The question is this: what are YOU teaching, Dean? You failed to answer my questions. Here they are , once again:
You make
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/30/2006 7:55:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
David Miller wrote:
It is not a sin to attend a Benny Hinn service seeking
for a healing from God. It is a sin for the University
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 30, 2006 19:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
David Miller wrote:
It is not a sin to attend a Benny Hinn service seeking
for a healing from God. It is a sin for the University
to promote and indoctrinate students to engage in
homosexual fornication
. Sorry that you do not. Actually, your decisionisquite upsetting to me.
jd
jd
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:20:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
You make it sound so simple, Dean. Which commandments. The 613 ?
cd:
I disagree David-why seek Hinn for the healing
and not Christ.
They are not seeking Hinn instead of Christ. They are seeking Christ. God
gives different gifts to different people. Some have gifts of healings. I
have been to five of Kathryn Kuhlman's meetings, and I believe that she
cd wrote:
When the women with the issue of blood touched
the robe of Christ-Her faith lead her to the source
and when she touched the source virtue flowed
from the source. It took both faith and the source
of virtue to heal her. Are you saying that B. Hinn
holds this type of virtue David?
I
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/31/2006 1:11:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd:
I disagree David-why seek Hinn for the healing
and not Christ.
They are not seeking Hinn instead of Christ. They are seeking
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/31/2006 1:53:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd wrote:
When the women with the issue of blood touched
the robe of Christ-Her faith lead her to the source
and when she touched
Lance wrote:
You, David, like many, are FOR THE
BIBLE, as you put it, when you massage
it to your own ends.
Not true, Lance. The Bible is useful for instruction in righteousness. It
not not meant to be massaged to one's own ends.
Lance wrote:
One the FEMALE free speech issue you are
'not a sin to...' Says who, David?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2006 21:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd wrote:
DavidM what is the difference between
your words to Lance concerning public
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/29/2006 9:15:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd wrote:
DavidM what is the difference between
your words to Lance concerning public
preaching and your stance concerning
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 11:08:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Ours is not a ministry of law. We are not about the preaching of Law. unless, of course, you confuse "law"
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:20:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
You make it sound so simple, Dean. Which commandments. The 613 ?
Those commandments that continue the practice of Judaism? How
David Miller wrote:
It is not a sin to attend a Benny Hinn service seeking
for a healing from God. It is a sin for the University
to promote and indoctrinate students to engage in
homosexual fornication.
Lance wrote:
'not a sin to...' Says who, David?
The Bible, Lance. BIBLE, BIBLE,
I do, David. Stop whining and, get on with it, David.
.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2006 00:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Lance wrote:
When you and your daughter decide to exercise
free speech
, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
No Judy, that is not my meaning. DM's post seemed to indicate surprise
over
the school's response. Why? When one enters the 'fray' one ought to expect
persons to contest her point of view. She is a woman and, peer to many who
don't like what
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
myth (that 'reasonable expectation' is false essentially the essence of
legalizm self-confirmed partic while your stated preaching/mission is
directed specifically against lawbreakers lawlessness lawbreaking)
On Sun
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/28/2006 9:12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Be wise as serpents, harmless as doves. This would appear NOT to describe Christine. If she climbs in the ring then, she'd best be prepared
for Dean, too, the
biblicity crucial to radical protestantism sounds like this--test it in
public again, see what happens:
[1.]
..[standing before you today with
no]reasonable expectation that the lawless
shouldobey thelaw[..] there is
no reason todeclare the law to the lawless..
[2.]
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 11:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
for Dean, too, the biblicity crucial to radical protestantism sounds like this--test it in public again, see what happens:
[1.]
..[standing before you
sinful..'
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 11:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free
Speech
||
[2.]
[however,
even whilewe do]not..obey the law,
[God
offers us]grace and
mercy
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 5:06:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
then in reality, point 2, below,is true--lawproduces sin in everybody, obedience in nobody, ever--this is radically Protestant, Bro
cd: Yes,I think so
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 5:06:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free
Speech
then in
reality, point 2, below,is true--lawproduces sin in everybody,
obedience in nobody, ever--this is radically Protestant,
Bro
||
cd: DavidM what is the difference between your words to Lance concerning public preaching and your stance concerning preachers at B.Hinn?It seems to me you are doing the same thing as Lancewas doing to Christine.Did you know that Kevin- whom you preached with in Florida- and Ruben are leaders
cd wrote:
DavidM what is the difference between
your words to Lance concerning public
preaching and your stance concerning
preachers at B.Hinn?
I can hardly believe you are asking me this question. It is not a sin to
attend a Benny Hinn service seeking for a healing from God. It is a sin
CTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech myth (that 'reasonable expectation' is fa
lse essentially the essence of legalizm self-confirmed partic while your stated preaching/mission is directed specifically against law
Be wise as serpents, harmless as doves. This would
appear NOT to describe Christine. If she climbs in the ring then, she'd best be
prepared for combat.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 28, 2006 09:05
Subject:
Are you intimating that Christine is "harmful" because
she speaks the truth in apublic
setting Lance? Sad that there is no honor or
wisdom in these places of learning ie:
"Professing themselves to be wise they became
fools"
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:11:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lance wrote:
Be wise as serpents, harmless as doves.
This would appear NOT to describe
Christine. If she climbs in the ring then,
she'd best be prepared for combat.
I just want to remind you that most of the so-called reports about her are
filled with false accusations. Christine is most
-
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 28, 2006 11:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free
Speech
Are you intimating that Christine is "harmful"
because she speaks the truth in apublic
setting
some of them will respond in a less than considerate fashion. Duh!
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 28, 2006 12:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Lance wrote:
Be wise as serpents, harmless as doves
28, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
No Judy, that is not my meaning. DM's post seemed to indicate surprise over
the school's response. Why? When one enters the 'fray' one ought to expect
persons to contest her point of view. She is a woman and, peer to many who
don't like
Lance wrote:
When you and your daughter decide to exercise
free speech with respect to OP's life choices then,
expect that at least some of them will respond in a
less than considerate fashion. Duh!
I have a reasonable expectation that they should obey the law. Speech is
meant to be
myth (that
'reasonable expectation'is false essentiallythe essence
of legalizm self-confirmed partic while your stated preaching/mission is
directed specifically
againstlawbreakerslawlessnesslawbreaking)
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:24:51 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I
have a
A David. Those writers probably didn't but, God sees the heart and,
you probably did.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 17, 2005 10:17
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Caroline wrote:
I believe we
Lance Muir wrote:
A David. Those writers probably didn't but, God sees the heart and,
you probably did.
===
Heah come de judge. His name be Lance
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
Caroline wrote:
The question is, am I crossing the line to hate when I write the
following:
Romans 1 + Leviticus 20:13 = Do Not Practice Homosexuality.
Please answer yes or no along with whatever commentary you like.
Is this line above expressing hatred? Canada says it is.
Caroline wrote:
Caroline wrote: Canada is very tolerant of religious teaching.DM wrote
LOL. Please answer my question.
CW's aversion to answering THE questionS has progressed to "see ya lata"
Could the aversion to answering the questionS have advanced to the aversion of just the questions?
David Miller [EMAIL
Caroline wrote:
I believe we can state our opinions without
cross the line to hate.
The question is, am I crossing the line to hate when I write the following:
Romans 1 + Leviticus 20:13 = Do Not Practice Homosexuality.
Please answer yes or no along with whatever commentary you like. Is this
Any ideaWHY they would do that? IZZY?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who water down the Word are sure to be safe from persecution. (Theyactually DO the persecuting of those who don't!) Izzy-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline
I hope you are not on the side of voting for more persecution of Chrsitians.
CW has already said preaching in public is hate and she said let Walcott pay his fine of over $17,000
Is that in Luneys? David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caroline wrote: I believe we can state our opinions without
And here I was feeling persecuted :-)
Love,
Caroline
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:53 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Those who water down the Word are sure to be safe from persecution
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Caroline wrote:
I believe we can state our opinions without
cross the line to hate.
The question is, am I crossing the line to hate when I write the
following:
Romans 1 + Leviticus 20:13 = Do Not Practice Homosexuality
lt;TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:17 AMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech Caroline wrote: I believe we can state our opinions without cross the line to hate. The question is, am I
crossing the line to hate when I write the following: Romans 1 + Leviticus 20:1
I believe we can state our opinions without cross the line to hate. And I
believe that persecution makes Christians and Christianity stronger. What do
we gain if we suffer for doing wrong? I welcome greater persecution for all
of us North Americans. Being the top dog has ruined us.
Love,
LDS want the right to preach on your PRIVATE PROPERTY, and have agued the same in federal court. Apparently they beleive others speech must be contained or silenced even on public sidewalks!
Preachers rebuff LDS buffer zones
By Brady SnyderDeseret Morning News
Despite Salt Lake City's
46 matches
Mail list logo
