Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
DAVEH: Does that mean I should reconsider thinking of you as a hypocritical Christian? :-) Charles Perry Locke wrote: I did and I do. But, with your aging selective memory, you probably would not recall that :-) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:12:56 -0800 *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references* DAVEH:If you knew you did such Perry, then did you consider reprimanding yourself as you might reprimand another TTer for a similar transgression?IOWDo you hold yourself to the same standards as you would hold others? Charles Perry Locke wrote: As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references*, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
As you like. From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:59:00 -0800 DAVEH: Does that mean I should reconsider thinking of you as a hypocritical Christian? :-) Charles Perry Locke wrote: I did and I do. But, with your aging selective memory, you probably would not recall that :-) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:12:56 -0800 *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references* DAVEH:If you knew you did such Perry, then did you consider reprimanding yourself as you might reprimand another TTer for a similar transgression?IOWDo you hold yourself to the same standards as you would hold others? Charles Perry Locke wrote: As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references*, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Congrats, Lance, I KNEW YOU COULD DO IT! You ansered my question in 1 post, despite all Thanks for KISS, Perry. Take care lest Dean show up a YOUR door. Dean probably understands what KISS means, and I do not think I have anything to worry about. It is the 'OTHER THAN' that I'm speaking of, Perry. Speaking of STUPID (you were weren't you?), your engagement with the Mormons on TT is petulant, pedantic and, lacking any prophetic component whatsoever. No, I was not speaking of STUPID, I was speaking of KEEP IT SIMPLE. But 1) you probably would have not gotten my drift if I had typed KIS, and 2) it is a very common term that simply means, don't make it any more complicated than it has to be. But, since you are seeking ammo against me, I would expect you to focus on that one word. As to your choice of 'obtuse' over 'abstruse' the last linguist I spoke with said that you are incorrect. Twist it any way you want, Lance. My meaning is that you do not answer questions directly. Abstruse implies that your responses cannot be understood. That is not what I am saying here (althought that, too, is often true). And, yes, I am sure you had a conversation with a linguist and intimately discussed the comparative uses of abstruse and obtuse. As to 'intelligence', I lay claim to none and, continue to prove it with every post. You speak down to people on this forum every day, Lance, from a position that assumes your intelligence and everyone elses igorance. Lastly, beloved moderator, should you continue to choose to carry on your engagement with our Mormon friends, might you at least address matters of some substance? Lance, as much as I tire of your cynicism, put downs, ad hokminems, and evasive responsesl, I would not think of asking you not to post on TT, except in the case of the use of ad himinems. So, learn to use your delete key and you will not be bothered. As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. Finally, when you respond to a post it is courteous to include a clip of the item to which you are responding. L P -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
COURTESY Perry. Do you actually read what's posted on TT? DEAN for instance, ever read him? Kevin for another instance, ever read him? I come off like Mr. Manners beside these two. It's the 'ox goring thingy' isn't it. The enemies of your enemies (MORMONS) are your friends. Make all the smart remarks you wish to Perry but, IMO, theological 'arm wrestling' is a waste of time. It's your time, Perry. Waste all of it that you wish. - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: December 11, 2005 12:03 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Congrats, Lance, I KNEW YOU COULD DO IT! You ansered my question in 1 post, despite all Thanks for KISS, Perry. Take care lest Dean show up a YOUR door. Dean probably understands what KISS means, and I do not think I have anything to worry about. It is the 'OTHER THAN' that I'm speaking of, Perry. Speaking of STUPID (you were weren't you?), your engagement with the Mormons on TT is petulant, pedantic and, lacking any prophetic component whatsoever. No, I was not speaking of STUPID, I was speaking of KEEP IT SIMPLE. But 1) you probably would have not gotten my drift if I had typed KIS, and 2) it is a very common term that simply means, don't make it any more complicated than it has to be. But, since you are seeking ammo against me, I would expect you to focus on that one word. As to your choice of 'obtuse' over 'abstruse' the last linguist I spoke with said that you are incorrect. Twist it any way you want, Lance. My meaning is that you do not answer questions directly. Abstruse implies that your responses cannot be understood. That is not what I am saying here (althought that, too, is often true). And, yes, I am sure you had a conversation with a linguist and intimately discussed the comparative uses of abstruse and obtuse. As to 'intelligence', I lay claim to none and, continue to prove it with every post. You speak down to people on this forum every day, Lance, from a position that assumes your intelligence and everyone elses igorance. Lastly, beloved moderator, should you continue to choose to carry on your engagement with our Mormon friends, might you at least address matters of some substance? Lance, as much as I tire of your cynicism, put downs, ad hokminems, and evasive responsesl, I would not think of asking you not to post on TT, except in the case of the use of ad himinems. So, learn to use your delete key and you will not be bothered. As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. Finally, when you respond to a post it is courteous to include a clip of the item to which you are responding. L P -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references DAVEH: If you knew you did such Perry, then did you consider reprimanding yourself as you might reprimand another TTer for a similar transgression? IOWDo you hold yourself to the same standards as you would hold others? Charles Perry Locke wrote: As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES
I did and I do. But, with your aging selective memory, you probably would not recall that :-) From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PERRY DIRECTLY ACKNOWLEDGES ATTACKING ON THE FORUM HE MODERATES Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:12:56 -0800 *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references* DAVEH:If you knew you did such Perry, then did you consider reprimanding yourself as you might reprimand another TTer for a similar transgression?IOWDo you hold yourself to the same standards as you would hold others? Charles Perry Locke wrote: As for my attacks on promoters of mormonism, I have explained that is is not the MESSENGER that I am attacking, but the ORIGINATOR of the messages. *There have been times when I have failed to make the distinction and used ad-hominem references*, but that certainly is not the rule with my anti-mormonism posts. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
