David Miller wrote:
DAVEH:
Would you be so kind as to elaborate just a little
more on the meaning of substance as used here.
Thanx.
The web site Marlin referred us to says that the substance is love. I'm not
sure that love can be called a substance.
DAVEH: Yeah..I agree with
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
To me it [the cross] was a work of those who rallied
against God. But through his power, my Lord overcame
the effect of the cross and was resurrected-
I think the Mormons teach contrary to the Bible about the cross and the
blood shed on the
In a message dated 11/1/2002 12:46:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH: Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would be no resurrection? Is it
Davldl - Why did you not answer my question below? Why can you not look beyond jewelry to the point of the Bible verse on the preaching of the cross?
There is something you are not telling us here. Right?
I underlinged a sentence you wrote below. "...I don't think it was because it saved him".
In a message dated 11/1/2002 7:28:27 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH: Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would be no resurrection? Is it
PREEveryone who wears a cross is not saved! Everyone who wears a heart is not
in love! Laura
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts
If they are not the same thing why do you compare them?
Dave my friend - Judas and the cross are the same thing?
DAVEH: Nopebut they both contributed to the end result. Yet one is revered, and the other despised.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is the difference between Mormons and
Glenn wrote:
Judas and the cross are the same thing?
DAVEH:
Nopebut they both contributed to the end
result. Yet one is revered, and the other despised.
Dave, a huge difference is that the cross represents Christ's love. Jesus
laid down his life voluntarily, and thereby brought
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
they are not the same thing why do you compare them?
DAVEH: I'm trying to find out why Protestants revere one, and despise
the other when they seemingly are closely related. DavidM did a splendid
job of answering (thank you, DavidM) it this morning. Essentially
he
Glenn - Have you ever wondered why the survivors of the PA plane crash wanted to go to the place the plane went down?
If they are not the same thing why do you compare them?
DAVEH: I'm trying to find out why Protestants revere one, and despise the other when they seemingly are closely related.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message
dated 10/30/2002 12:44:16 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That
is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross
there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH:
Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would
In a message dated 10/30/2002 12:44:16 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH: Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would be no resurrection? Is it
Dave my friend - Judas and the cross are the same thing?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH: Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would be no resurrection? Is it the cross
-Original Message-
Blainer) Wowsers!! It is just that simple,
so I guess I must not be
able to understand simple things.
Izzy
says: God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise;
..the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're
going to have to ask DavidM questions. I am not going to answer your
questions until you answer mine.
DAVEH: I thought I had answered yours. Even DavidM pointed
my answers out to you. But, the material I quoted below contradicts
your opinion about "Trinity"
being
What is the cross a symbol of Blainer?
That is the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross there would be no resurrection. Laura
Blainer) Wowsers!! It is "just that simple," so I guess I must not be
able to understand simple things.
I wish it was that simple. The cross is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is
the difference between Mormons and Christians. Without the cross
there would be no resurrection. Laura
DAVEH: Hmm..would you say that without Judas there would
be no resurrection? Is it the cross that brought the resurrection
any more than Judas was
Blaine answers Glenn's Question:
Glenn wrote:
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no?
Do you believe that Jesus is God's son, second
person of the Godhead? Yes or no? Godhead
and Trinity are the same to me. Do you believe
that Jesus is God's son, second person of the
Trinity as
Am I the only one on TT that has a problem with the belief that Satan and Jesus are brothers?
Blainer) Why not just show us where in the Bible the word "Trinity" is
at? It is either there or it is not there.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:23:12 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To remove the Biblical
Substance as in Joe Smith's semen deposited in other men's wives. Herein lies the historical evidence. Is semon a substance?
DAVEH: Thanx for the great explanation, DavidM. Would you be so kind as to elaborate just a little more on the meaning of "substance" as used here. Thanx.
Here we go with the cult psychology again; another question?
DaveL - How do you respond this this Bible verse?
DAVEH: I'm not offended by the cross. I sometimes think that Christians (and the RCC in particular) 'over use' the cross in their worship.but that is their (worship) business, and
DaveH wrote:
To me it [the cross] was a work of those who rallied
against God. But through his power, my Lord overcame
the effect of the cross and was resurrected-
I think the Mormons teach contrary to the Bible about the cross and the
blood shed on the cross. Was the cross part of
Blainer) As DaveM said, Glenn, you just want us to answer yes or no,
preferably no, so you can shout cult! cult!
You make it plain as the pane in my storm door that you have no
intention of discussing anything for the purpose of getting at the truth.
You have apparently read somewhere that
Blainer) It is in the Bible alright, and probably not a mistake. But
neither is it a commandment. The belief that we must have crosses in our
chapels and around our necks is purely a tradition. God never said we
had to do that. He told the Israelites to splash blood on their
doorposts to be
First of all, I have no intention of converting you. The Holy Spirit told me you have crossed the line of no return. As for the statement below. you, Mr. my nose up Joe boys butt, are a liar.
Glenn, because the Mormon
Church is not a cult that exercises mind control over its members,
You cannot be a REAL Christian WITHOUT a cross. Anyone who despises the
cross, despises Jesus. Anyone with a take it or leave it attitude
towards the cross has never had his sins washed away by the power of the
Blood shed upon that sign of the price HE paid. The cross the FULCRUM
upon which our
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin Christian Perfection
Marlin wrote:
Life is just too precious and short to get
involved in attitudes. ... Let's love the truth.
What a beautiful statement. We often fall way short of this on TruthTalk.
Let's
ShieldsFamily wrote:
You cannot be a REAL Christian WITHOUT a cross. Anyone who despises the
cross, despises Jesus. Anyone with a take it or leave it attitude
towards the cross has never had his sins washed away by the power of the
Blood shed upon that sign of the price HE paid. The cross
Davel - You can't even get the questions right, much less answer them. I don't give a flip what DavidM says about the Trinity. I ask you a question and you won't even answer it. I ask you a question, and I EVEN DEFINED THE TERMS. I STILL CAN'T GET A STRAIGHT ANSWER. HAVE A GOOD DAY.
Futhermore,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Davel
- You can't even get the questions right, much less answer them.
I don't give a flip what DavidM says about the Trinity. I ask you
a question and you won't even answer it.
DAVEH: Sorry 'bout that, Brother Glenn. I've been out of town
the past few days, and still
Blainer) The word for Glenn is contrary. Little kids go through this
stage, at about age 3, if I recall my old child psychology. LOL
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:20:50 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No offense taken, but total 100% disagreement. Trinity is a
perfectly good
word. You let Jeff
Blainer) Why not just show us where in the Bible the word Trinity is
at? It is either there or it is not there.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:23:12 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To remove the Biblical word Trinity is compromise to get along with
a cult
that believes Jesus and Satan are
Blaqiner) Yes
Do you believe a.) Jesus and his father have corporal bodies? Or b.) do
you believe they are just spirits? Multiple choice--a or b?
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:57:34 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Glenn wrote:
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no?
Do you
Blainer) That was very informative. Thanks for your time to write it.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:58:28 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Blainer wrote:
Well, OK. I guess the answer is yes. That won't
cost me any money to say that. It is just that I am
not sure what you mean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Davel
- You can't even get the questions right, much less answer them.
I don't give a flip what DavidM says about the Trinity.
DAVEH: Really?!?!?!?! I do. I'm trying to figure
out what you guys (Protestants) believe. Are you suggesting that
DavidM's perspective does not
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin Christian Perfection
Blaqiner) Yes
Do you believe a.) Jesus and his father have corporal bodies? Or b.) do
you believe they are just spirits? Multiple choice
David Miller wrote:
Blaine, I'm going to try real quickly to explain this. Unfortunately, I
think you might reverse yourself when you hear the answer. :-)
The word Trinity historically does have a special meaning. It is a word
meant to designate a Godhead that, while being 3 persons,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh,
no, my friend. I have heard all of this stuff on TT about us becoming
gods,
DAVEH: From no less than CS Lewis. He was a Protestant theologian,
was he not???
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To
remove the Biblical word "Trinity"
DAVEH: Glenn, Marlin posted a website to help understand the
mystery of the Trinity. I found this quote there, which seems to
support my position
**
Formulation of Trinitarian Doctrine (Circa 100-500 A.D.)
If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
did not JUST say Biblical Jesus. I defined the Biblical Jesus using
Martin's definition
DAVEH: You are losing me on this, Glenn. I thought Martin's
comments were related to cults. Did I miss something? Did he
also define "Biblical
Jesus"???
which
was a simple
Pastor James PS Templeton wrote:
I
pray to the Father in the Name of Jesus! I never felt led to pray to the
Holy Spirit. To say Dear Holy Spirit, seems all wrong, yet in worshipping
and praising our God, we can surely say blessed Holy Spirit and acknowledge
the wonderful works of God
Glenn - Christians believe Jesus is God's son, second person of the Trinity. Mormons do not belive that, correct? I don't expect to get a simply yes or no without qualifications. I'm slow but I have figured this out.
Concerning Biblical words in the Bible...there are no English words in the
My comments mean that when Mormons say, "yes" it is not yes. When Mormons say "no" it is never no. It is always with chainging word meanings or later on coming back claiming it was not "yes'" or it was not "no".
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bottom line is I just would appreciate Mormons telling
Glenn to James - Here what you said.\
The Trinity is man?s definition of Godhead. Can man define our Infinite Godhead? No one can claim that the Westminster Confession has the same level of inspiration as the Scriptures. James Templeton
Then you said:
I don?t like the word Trinity either, and I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn
- Blainer - Do you believe "Jesus is God's Son, second person of the Trinity?
You seemed to have reworded it when you answered. I just cannot not
get a yes or no. It's always qualified answer. I cannot get
a yes or not.
This
is not a trick question.
Where
do I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn
- Christians believe Jesus is God's son, second person of the Trinity.
Mormons do not belive that, correct?
DAVEH: Like I've intimated before.I don't know if I believe that
because I don't understand what you mean by "Trinity"...Do
you??? If so, please
I use the word Trinity because it is a perfectly good Biblical word. I don't choose to let cults change vocabulary. Furthermore, the word Trinity exposes the Mormon deceit (lie) of believing in the Biblical Jesus.
IF we go by what you recommend, then must speak in Greek (and a dead Greek at
THEN YOUR ANSWER IS NO. WHY DIDN'T YOU JUST SAY THAT? I do not get straight answers out of a Mormons.
DAVEH: Then why use a word that is not Biblical? Simply change your above comment from.. "Christians believe Jesus is God's son, second person of the Trinity." ..to.
Oh, no, my friend. I have heard all of this stuff on TT about us becoming gods, that Jesus is created, sex in heaven, etc,. I cut through the deceit (lies) and exposed it for what it is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn - Blainer - Do you believe "Jesus is God's Son, second person of the Trinity?
Blainer) Well, OK. I guess the answer is yes. That won't cost me any
money to say that. It is just that I am not sure what you mean when you
include the word Trinity. If this word has just general meaning, OK,
but if it has some special meaning, in reference to some thing or event
in
Glenn wrote:
I use the word Trinity because it is a
perfectly good Biblical word.
The word Trinity is NOT a Biblical word. Accepting the idea of a Trinity
might be Biblical in that it is consonant with the Bible, but the word
Trinity itself is not found in the Bible; therefore, it is not a
I can't believe you can say this. Of course it is a Biblical word. According to this legalism no ENGLISH WORD IS BIBLICAL.
Glenn wrote:
I use the word Trinity because it is a
perfectly good Biblical word.
The word "Trinity" is NOT a Biblical word. Accepting the idea of a Trinity
might be
Names are important. God named things. Evil needs to be named. If names are not important, I will start calling you Fido.
Personally, I would like to drop the label "Trinity" and use Biblical
language like "Godhead." I wish we also could drop our designations of
"Mormon" and "Protestant." Let's
No offense taken, but total 100% disagreement. Trinity is a perfectly good word. You let Jeff deceive you. My point, was Mormons can never give a yes or no. WHY??? Because they are a cult.
Glenn, no offense intended, but your interaction here is so blatantly biased
and false, how can you
Glenn wrote:
Names are important. God named things.
Evil needs to be named. If names are not
important, I will start calling you Fido.
LOL. I guess you need to give me some name to differentiate me from your
BIG dog that Laura told us about. :-)
I agree that names are important, but if
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no? Do you believe that Jesus is God's son, second person of the Godhead? Yes or no? Godhead and Trinity are the same to me. Do you believe tht Jesus is God's son, second person of the Trinity as defined by DavidM? Yes or no?
Glenn wrote:
Names are important.
Glenn wrote:
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no?
Do you believe that Jesus is God's son, second
person of the Godhead? Yes or no? Godhead
and Trinity are the same to me. Do you believe
that Jesus is God's son, second person of the
Trinity as defined by DavidM? Yes or no?
Thank
David Miller wrote:
Glenn wrote:
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no?
Do you believe that Jesus is God's son,
DAVEH: Yes.
second
person of the Godhead? Yes or no?
DAVEH: Yes.
Godhead
and Trinity are the same to me.
DAVEH: I disagree.
Do you believe
that Jesus is
Glenn to DAveH - You just called me a liar. I told you I believe the Trinity and Godhead are the same. You said you disagree. HOW in the world can you disagree that I believe the Godhead and Trinity are the same?
PS. I am not offended you called me a liar. I quite like it. It tells me a lot.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn
to DAveH - You just called me a liar.
DAVEH: Do you really think so, Glenn. Go back and read it again.
And..I'd be curious if any other TTers understood my answer in the
same way that you do.
I
told you I believe the Trinity and Godhead are the same. You said
Glenn wrote:
OK, Mormons will I ever get a yes or no?
Do you believe that Jesus is God's son,
DAVEH:
Yes.
Glenn wrote:
second person of the Godhead? Yes or no?
DAVEH:
Yes.
Glenn wrote:
Godhead and Trinity are the same to me.
DAVEH:
I disagree.
DAVEH:
I've answered those questions
The below is how I hear you say yes to a question and then turn around and explain away yes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we go again. I just can't get answers.
DAVEH: Huh?!?!?!?!..What do you think those below comments are following my name???
Red is not red and blue is not blue. Red is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice
that Jesus is not on the cross.
DAVEH: Hmm.ever notice the RCC folks, Glenn? They seem
to relish the image of Jesus hanging on the cross. Perhaps Protestants
found that image too repugnant, and have removed Christ from that shameful
position and are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
already did from one of the greatest scholars in the 90's.
Jesus
to the Christian is God the Son, second person of the Trinity.
DAVEH: I would agree to that IF you will be willing to change "Trinity"
to Godhead or something similar. After all, "Trinity"
is not
Again, this seems like a different Jesus. 1 Cor. 1:18. I have never heard a good word from you on the cross. The Bible is full of references to the cross.
Why do Mormons REFUSE to have a cross? Do you consider it a sin to wear a cross?
DAVEH: LDS folks have had to bear their crosses just as
]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002
7:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin
Christian Perfection
Maybe the cross shows how each group
places the emphasis on Christ: On the cross - the
crucifiction Off the cross - the
resurection No cross - Christ
In a message dated 10/24/2002 7:30:38 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Laura,
All of the cults who reject Christ’s atoning Blood also reject the cross (like Jehovah’s Witness and LDS). The cross is an affront to satan, and to those who are deceived by satan. It is the
But, DaveL, I thought you said you worshiped the same Jesus. Now you are doing with Jesus what you did with the inerrency article. You say you believe in them both, but you must change what was said in order to believe. I don't understand why you don't understand this is deceit.
12 pieces of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But,
DaveL, I thought you said you worshiped the same Jesus.
DAVEH: You were the one who used the term, "Biblical Jesus".
OK Glenn.I asked you to define that, and you used a non-Biblical term.
To me that takes Jesus out of the Biblical realm.
Now
you are doing with
The bottom line is I just would appreciate Mormons telling us what they believe with all the "wisdom" added to it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I am gREATLY under the influence of Satan for following the Bible only.
DAVEH: Who am I to disagree with one who pontificates so brilliantly!
Tell me James, what country do you live in? What is your denominational background? Who have you fought with religiously in your life? I am trying to figure out where you are coming from?
I pray to the Father in the Name of Jesus! I never felt led to pray to the Holy Spirit. To say Dear Holy
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:41:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus to the Christian means God the Son, second person of the
Trinity.
Do you believe the above?
Jesus to the Mormon signifies a polygamous offspring of another god
and mary,
one god in a pantheon of gods.
Blainer)
Blainer) Yes, but we believe Jesus and the Father are two separate
persons, one in mind and purpose. The BoM states in several places that
the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost are ONE GOD. But ONE means as I
indicated--one in mind and purpose. When JS saw the first vision, he saw
one
Glenn - I am sorry too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mormons cannot be trusted. They are in a con game over the dumbing of America. They say what needs to be said in order to seduce people into hell fire.
DAVEH: I'm sincerely sorry you feel that way, Glenn.
Glenn wrote:
WHAT? No way. Just
Notice that Jesus is not on the cross. He has risen. This is a red flag to millions of Christians...this anti-cross thing. It's not that you don't have a cross IT'S THAT MORMONS REFUSE TO HAVE A CROSS.
They seem to refuse to put up a cross in their buildings.
DAVEH: Is that required to be a
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin
Christian Perfection
In a message dated 10/23/2002
2:37:31 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They seem to refuse to put up a cross in
their buildings.
DAVEH:
Is that required to be a 'Christian' church? We simply prefer
Agreed And it reminds us that Christ is who he said he was! Laura
Laura,
The cross is an offense to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
Izzy
Dear Sister Laura, I agree with you. That
is an excellent response, James Templeton
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2002 12:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin
Christian
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2002 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sin
Christian Perfection
Glenn this friend DavidM - You
are really enjoyed this aren't you. :-)
Glenn wrote:
David, I can't comminute with you on this.
You, my friend, Are so blinded on this subject
AGain, you just ask questions without responding to what I say.
Glenn - I say Mormons are not plain on their belief in Jesus.
DAVEH: What have I not tried to explain to you, Glenn? If my explanations are not "plain" enough, I will repeat them as many times as you need. I think it's my eternal
Blainer) Yes
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:54:46 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PREBlaine, Do you believe Jesus is God the Son? Laura
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6)
Blainer) I swear, Glenn, . . . Where and when did I ever say I do
not believe Jesus is God the Son?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:25:05 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Glenn - I say Mormons are not plain on their belief in Jesus. They
seem to
refuse to put up a cross in their buildings.
If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn
- I say Mormons are not plain on their belief in Jesus.
DAVEH: What have I not tried to explain to you, Glenn? If my
explanations are not "plain"
enough, I will repeat them as many times as you need. I think it's
my eternal goal to help you understand as a child,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGain,
you just ask questions without responding to what I say.
DAVEH: Your comments were directed to a discussion between Laura
and Blaine. I was merely commenting on some things that came to mindwhilst
I read your remarks.
Now Glenn, if you will notice I asked you
When I took a class on cults we were taught to start with what the "group" taught about Jesus. If they didn't believe that Jesus was God the Son, born of the virgin Mary, and that he was crucified,dead and buried, rose again and will come again, then we should be suspicious. Laura
The major
Glenn wrote:
The major reference "Cults Reference Bible" defines cults:
A group of people polarized about the religious interpretations
or teachings of a specific individual or organization. IT
ALWAYS CLAIMS TO BE IN HARMONY WITH
CHRISTIANITY, BUT IT ALWAYS ENDS UP
DENYING THAT JESUS CHRIST
Glenn wrote:
Are you claiming the KJ Version is free?
No, you are not.
Yes, I am saying that the King James Version is free. You can download it
on many web sites for free. You can get free Bible programs that include
the KJV (for example, at www.e-sword.net). However, you cannot download
OK, maybe I need a more balanced view of him. I don't think there is any doubt that he was immoral. I read an extensive article in seminary about the translators having a meeting to not translate "baptizo" as the King was not immersed. They didn't want to offend God and translate it sprinkling so
Glenn - The Bible talks about this picking over every jot and tittle. Ever learning and never coming to the truth. I see no difference. I honestly don't. You pay either way. Furthermore, you are overlooking American copyright laws. What were/are the copyright laws in England? You are overlooking
Glenn wrote:
David, I can't comminute with you on this.
You, my friend, Are so blinded on this subject
it is unbelievable. Baptizio is NOT a translation
but a compromise; a transliteration. They did
not translate the word. Much learning has made
thee mad on this. :-)
I understand that
Glenn wrote:
WHAT? No way. Just because DaveL says so
does not mean it is the official doctrine of the Mormons.
I read this also on the Mormon web site.
Glenn wrote:
LOL Anyone who disagree with you is wrong. Real
scholars agree with you and those who don't are not
real scholars.
Mormons cannot be trusted. They are in a con game over the dumbing of America. They say what needs to be said in order to seduce people into hell fire.
Glenn wrote:
WHAT? No way. Just because DaveL says so
does not mean it is the official doctrine of the Mormons.
I read this also on the Mormon
DavidM. LOL
Who determines what is a misinterpretation?
Then herein lies a problem with the King James. Their guidlines were wrong to start with. Bad foundation. No decision was made to translate a word before they came to the word to translate. I find this hard to believe.
But it is OK to make money off of the KJ Bible by selling it, but not OK to
Blainer) All fundamental to Mormon belief, Laura. But Glenn insists we
are still a cult?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:53:24 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I took a class on cults we were taught to start with what the
group
taught about Jesus. If they didn't believe that Jesus was God the
Glenn - I say Mormons are not plain on their belief in Jesus. They seem to refuse to put up a cross in their buildings.
If Mormons believe in the Biblical Jesus they are not a cult. But this stuff about Jesus being created and the brother of Satan is suspect at best and perhaps they have Satan
PREBlaine, Do you believe Jesus is God the Son? Laura
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mormons
cannot be trusted. They are in a con game over the dumbing of America.
They say what needs to be said in order to seduce people into hell fire.
DAVEH: I'm sincerely sorry you feel that way, Glenn.
Glenn
wrote:
>
WHAT? No way. Just because DaveL says so
>
does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn,
as long as you have been on this forum, you should know that Mormons
teach that Jesus Christ
is the Lord God Jehovah of the Old Testament himself
in human flesh. All
I'm saying is that your book has a lame definition,
because that definition
does not include
I hope not, since Mormons are not a part of Christianity. I don't think Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Scientists were.
Most all denominations? Were Mormons included? Do you really mean MOST ALL
denominations?
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
