On 2016-09-19 09:07, Ali Kefia wrote:
>
>
> Le lundi 19 septembre 2016 17:40:03 UTC+2, Cédric Krier a écrit :
> >
> > On 2016-09-19 08:19, Ali Kefia wrote:
> > > the issue with cache on multi workers is that invalidation does not
> > > propagate.
> >
> > Could you proof your statement?
> >
>
Le lundi 19 septembre 2016 17:40:03 UTC+2, Cédric Krier a écrit :
>
> On 2016-09-19 08:19, Ali Kefia wrote:
> > the issue with cache on multi workers is that invalidation does not
> > propagate.
>
> Could you proof your statement?
>
Context: multi-process.
I could miss something (that is
On 2016-09-19 08:19, Ali Kefia wrote:
> the issue with cache on multi workers is that invalidation does not
> propagate.
Could you proof your statement?
> And since using db is counter cache principle, we took Redis.
I do not understand the reasoning.
> side effect advantages were:
>
>-
On 2016-09-19 05:32, Ali Kefia wrote:
> May be I missed something but it is worth asking a question:
> When we have 2 workers, W1 and W2, working on an instance (call it a
> product), how to manage this situation:
>
>- W1 added product to cache (from database)
>- W2 modified product and
Le lundi 19 septembre 2016 14:05:02 UTC+2, Cédric Krier a écrit :
>
> On 2016-09-19 13:34, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> > El 19/09/16 a les 10:26, Ali Kefia ha escrit:
> > > We faced this problem last year and worked on scaling trytond this way
> > >
> > > * Shared Cache on Redis
>
On 2016-09-19 04:52, Ali Kefia wrote:
> We tried to investigate ir.cache and did not succeed to ensure propagating
> invalidation
What did you miss?
--
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
--
You received this
On 2016-09-19 13:34, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 19/09/16 a les 10:26, Ali Kefia ha escrit:
> > We faced this problem last year and worked on scaling trytond this way
> >
> > * Shared Cache on Redis
> > * Load balance with Nginx
> > * Sync mechanism via redis PUB/SUB to reload
Le lundi 19 septembre 2016 13:34:06 UTC+2, Sergi Almacellas Abellana a
écrit :
>
> El 19/09/16 a les 10:26, Ali Kefia ha escrit:
> > We faced this problem last year and worked on scaling trytond this way
> >
> > * Shared Cache on Redis
> > * Load balance with Nginx
> > * Sync
2016-09-19 10:18 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> > 2016-08-04 17:27 GMT+02:00 Fabián :
> > - Patch trytond to connect to this running instance using pipe
>
> The patch to replace wait by communicate is interesting as there is a
> warning in the doc:
>
On 2016-09-19 09:54, Jean Cavallo wrote:
> 2016-08-04 17:27 GMT+02:00 Fabián :
> - Patch trytond to connect to this running instance using pipe
The patch to replace wait by communicate is interesting as there is a
warning in the doc:
2016-08-04 17:27 GMT+02:00 Fabián :
> - Many times Tryton hang up. Seems as it happens in the process when
> convert ODT to PDF. In server I see there a lot of processes in background.
> I put a few of them [2]. When processes are hang up, it is no possible to
> pay any
11 matches
Mail list logo