+1 on the TSF initiative.
There is a lot of value in going this direction.
Some of the umbrella foundations require relicensing prior to joining.
-1
David Mitchell
President
NovaPoint Group LLC
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
I agree with Albert. Foundation is not community. I prefer committed
individuals than representatives, even from communities
Le 28/06/2011 08:44, Albert Cervera i Areny a écrit :
A Dimarts, 28 de juny de 2011 01:02:12, liebana va escriure:
So, my questions:
- Is there any roadmap with the
Le 26/06/2011 21:49, Nicolas Évrard a écrit :
On a second though I must say that I think there is a small issue with
a paying membership : what happens for people of developing
countries ? 100 € per year is not that much for someone from Europe
but would this amount prevent people from
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in
companies and the other in individuals that represents these
companies. We think is better that some people make the decisions of
the foundation (members)
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in
companies and the other in
En/na Albert Cervera i Areny ha escrit:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts
* Albert Cervera i Areny [2011-06-29 13:44 +0200]:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one
En/na Cédric Krier ha escrit:
On 26/06/11 08:40 -0700, Jordi Esteve wrote:
- Members can be people or companies.
Well, we would like more that members (who have voice in the
foundation elections) were only people and sponsors people or
companies, like other free software
I hope it is okay that I respond to a posting a while back in the
discussion, but there were so many comments in the course of the debate
that I wasn't sure where to begin.
I have not really been using Tryton, only experimenting with it, but I
do have some potentially useful experiences from my
Hi,
I'm really happy with this discussion, so first of all I want to thank
you all for the iniciative. The words from Jordi are like mine too:
he's an strong believer of pure open-source projects and his company
has already prove that in the OpenERP community. So everything I agree
in everything
Good initiative. We (Zikzakmedia SL) think that Tryton needs to have
his own foundation, so the project itself will not be controlled by a
single/few company or individual in the future. In fact, we and other
Spanish companies are evaluating the convenience to start working with
this nice project
On 26/06/11 08:40 -0700, Jordi Esteve wrote:
- Members can be people or companies.
Well, we would like more that members (who have voice in the
foundation elections) were only people and sponsors people or
companies, like other free software foundations like in KDE. In this
way, the
* Jordi Esteve [2011-06-26 17:40 +0200]:
Good initiative. We (Zikzakmedia SL) think that Tryton needs to have
his own foundation, so the project itself will not be controlled by a
single/few company or individual in the future. In fact, we and other
Spanish companies are evaluating the
Yes the Tryton Software Foundation is really a good initiative.
What i be expect from Tryton Software Foundation is accelerated development
of modules. Facelift of the tryton as a community and member collaboration
in big projects and developer repository for selling addon's on a nominal
price.
On 27/06/11 01:23 +0500, Syed Shahrukh Hussain wrote:
Yes the Tryton Software Foundation is really a good initiative.
What i be expect from Tryton Software Foundation is accelerated development
of modules.
Perhaps, but it is not the main goal. It is the community who does the
development.
*Facelift of the tryton as a community and member collaboration
in big projects*
Its like provide some sort of collaboration mechanism for projects, Yes like
a previous thread which was talking about a real management system. Well
tryton a community can initiate such project. Or atleast have
On 27/06/11 01:42 +0500, Syed Shahrukh Hussain wrote:
*Facelift of the tryton as a community and member collaboration
in big projects*
Its like provide some sort of collaboration mechanism for projects, Yes like
a previous thread which was talking about a real management system. Well
*We don't have yet any money that you already want to spend it.
*Maybe its normal for newcomer to experience a pre-mature realization.
I don't have an extensive experience in developing ERP applications, i just
write code. That's why i asked for the case studies.I didn't find the
blueprint much
On Jun 27, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 27/06/11 01:42 +0500, Syed Shahrukh Hussain wrote:
*Facelift of the tryton as a community and member collaboration
in big projects*
Its like provide some sort of collaboration mechanism for projects, Yes like
a previous thread which was
19 matches
Mail list logo
