A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure: > On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure: > > > As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in > > > companies and the other in individuals that represents these > > > companies. We think is better that some people make the decisions of > > > the foundation (members) and others, companies or people, fund the > > > foundation (sponsors) to avoid mix the decisions with money. > > > > IMHO both things are not incompatible. I think probably most of us will > > agree that sponsors and members should be separated. So a company may be > > member but not sponsor and another one may be sponsor but not member. > > The thing is that if companies were allowed to be members, should they > > have the same vote than individuals? I think it should be this way. > > For me, you can be member and sponsor. I don't see any issue in this.
I don't see a problem either, but IMHO they should not be related. (No more "votes" because you pay more). -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com OpenERP Partners Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog -- [email protected] mailing list
