* Albert Cervera i Areny [2011-06-29 13:44 +0200]:
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
> > As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in
> > companies and the other in individuals that represents these
> > companies. We think is better that some people make the decisions of
> > the foundation (members) and others, companies or people, fund the
> > foundation (sponsors) to avoid mix the decisions with money.
>
> IMHO both things are not incompatible. I think probably most of us will
> agree that sponsors and members should be separated. So a company may be
> member but not sponsor and another one may be sponsor but not member.
> The thing is that if companies were allowed to be members, should they
> have the same vote than individuals? I think it should be this way.
For me, you can be member and sponsor. I don't see any issue in this.
I don't see a problem either, but IMHO they should not be related. (No more
"votes" because you pay more).
It seemed so obvious to me that I did not even think that company
contributing more money should get more vote. But since there is a
misunderstanding we should add that
- Members (individual or company) of the foundation only get one
vote in the voting process.
--
Nicolas Évrard
B2CK SPRL
rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
E-mail/Jabber: [email protected]
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
--
[email protected] mailing list
