I tried to have a look at everything, though as a tryton newcommer
I admit that I could not understand perfectly.
Maybe you should upgrade a simple (or dummy) module and make
a before-after comparison ? I saw bits of it in a few (mostly) test
classes, but it often is renaming _name, removing
On 30/04/12 11:08 +0200, Jean Cavallo wrote:
I tried to have a look at everything, though as a tryton newcommer
I admit that I could not understand perfectly.
Maybe you should upgrade a simple (or dummy) module and make
a before-after comparison ? I saw bits of it in a few (mostly) test
Maybe you should upgrade a simple (or dummy) module and make
a before-after comparison ? I saw bits of it in a few (mostly) test
classes, but it often is renaming _name, removing _description
and adding @staticmethod / @classmethod everywhere.
There are modules: ir, res and webdav.
I
A Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012 12:51:56, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
For inline usage, why not using the same syntax as sphinx inline. It
could be something like:
:field:`ir.cron/user`
What you suggest is named a role in sphinx terms. When I looked at the docs
to find out
On 30/04/12 19:52 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012 12:51:56, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
For inline usage, why not using the same syntax as sphinx inline. It
could be something like:
:field:`ir.cron/user`
What you suggest is named
On 30/04/12 21:27 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dilluns, 30 d'abril de 2012 20:36:14, Cédric Krier va escriure:
On 30/04/12 19:52 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
A Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012 12:51:56, Albert Cervera i Areny va
escriure:
For inline usage, why not using
