On 30/04/12 19:52 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012 12:51:56, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure: > > > For inline usage, why not using the same syntax as sphinx inline. It > > > > > > could be something like: > > > :field:`ir.cron/user` > > > > What you suggest is named a role in sphinx terms. When I looked at the docs > > to find out how to implement this, my understanding was that I needed a > > Directive instead but I may be wrong. Will take a look at this. > > I rechecked that, and I still think that we need the inline syntax I > proposed. > The problem with sphinx's inline syntax is that you cannot have one role > inside another one so you cannot make your inline field bold, for example. So > the following is not allowed: > > *:field:`ir.cron/user`*
Is it really a problem compared to the homogeneity of the text. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpd6Ala2RBGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
