Jorge Godoy wrote:
> There was an implementation of that on the MochiKit mailing list
>
I guess it was added: http://mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/Selector.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I'll pitch in my opinions:
On 12/11/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dojo has more features than any other JavaScript toolkit that I've come
> across (it also has the infrastructure to support that -- flexible build
> system, new inline documentation tool). Perhaps it's slower, I ha
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:22 AM, Jorge Godoy wrote:
>> MochiKit's bigger, if you're using an all-in-one MochiKit.js, but
>> MochiKit's
>> also modular if you want to use it that way.
>
> It is hard to use it modularly with our current implementation...
> If we need
> it our widgets will call the
Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> TurboGears 2.0 will be 100 eggs by the time we're done with this )
I don't mind. setuptools downloads everything that is required :-)
> Luckily, tgsetup.py will make it one install. We'll definitely need
> to have a script to provide an offline in
Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MochiKit 1.4 (with either the Scriptaculous port or Karl's newer Animator
> library) seems to do just about everything the others (proto+Scriptaculous,
> jQuery, moo) do. jQuery has the CSS selector thing, but if it's truly useful
> I'd imagine that Bob
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Alberto Valverde wrote:
> So now my plan for action is:
>
> 1) new ToscaWidgetsMochi egg with the mochikit widget
> 2) new ToscaWidgetsJQuery egg with the jQuery widget and wrappers for
> the cool accordions, tabs, bells and whistles.
> 3) js_interface.core.EventAware
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:08 AM, Max Ischenko wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/06, Ian Charnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the accordion in jquery any better than
> the accordion in mootools? Is scriptaculous' lightbox any better than
> jquery's graybox? Because we can't provide them all so that people
>
On Dec 10, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Adam Jones wrote:
>
> Kevin, where is your time machine? We need to get a Dangoor army put
> together to work on TG 3.0.
Unfortunately, the time machine doesn't isn't slated until TG 4.0.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this messa
On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Lee McFadden wrote:
>
> I think that if ToscaWidgets are to be truly framework independant
> then the core widgets shouldn't use a JS library at all.
This is more or less what I've been thinking about as I've meditated
the issue more carefully...
How about not i
