[tg-trunk] Re: Supported Template Engines

2009-05-18 Thread percious
I feel that the mako support is just as good as genshi, in terms of the framework code. I primarily use mako for it's concise syntax and speed. I have built master/index for mako and would be happy to publish them, but I have received a bit of pushback from the TG2 team whilst recommending

[tg-trunk] Re: Templating: .mak vs .mako vs Genshi

2009-05-18 Thread percious
.mak is also what TW uses, so there might be some historical justification for using .mak I personally +1 the effort to move over to .mako, and could/would make the change in TW to match. cheers. -chris On May 14, 10:27 pm, Jorge Vargas jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at

[tg-trunk] Re: Supported Template Engines

2009-05-18 Thread Mark Ramm
I am fine with adding them to quickstart in 2.1 as an option. In fact I think that could be very useful. I think there are some concerns about the complexity of the QS template, and I think that we do need to be mindful of that, but supporting Mako out of the box is an important goal. --Mark