Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Pass-by-value related SPI change

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Ant (I assume you are leaning to 2 with some name changes) DataExchangeSemantics sounds good for me. Less sure we really need the .feature. in the package name right now if the SPIs are going to reviewed/tidied in the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2010) Default binding URI for service from Composite impl component is incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2010. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)

Re: Tuscany participation at Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2008

I've still some ideas from what i'm working now: interoperability. Yesterday i saw native SCA C++ and I noticed some things, that it would be nice have: * porting SCA C++ to Axis 1.2 * add to SCA C++ support for gSOAP 2 (it's faster in parsing then Axis) - don't know licenses. * testing

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2058) The method XSDHelper.isXSD(Type) is returning invalid information

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12576145#action_12576145 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2058: - Having consulted, it seems that the

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4 above. I think we need to amend point 4 to make this work properly.. 4. Point my Web browser to the

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4 above. I

Re: [Spec Related] 'provides' attribute in PolicySet

No. The type of @name is either NCName or QName. It cannot be both. If it is an NCName, then it cannot have a namespace prefix; the namespace is always the targetNamespace. If it is a QName, then it can have a namespace prefix; if it does not have a prefix then it uses the default namespace

Re: [Spec Related] 'provides' attribute in PolicySet

Ok. I seemed to have lost the plot down the line. Now that I have re-read Mike's explanation in this thread, it does seem like you have a point. - Venkat On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The type of @name is either NCName or QName. It cannot be

Re: [Spec Related] 'provides' attribute in PolicySet

Thinking a bit futher about this, I am wondering what would we expect for 'requires' attribute of a ProfileIntent. Do we assume that the intents required by the Profile Intent should also belong to the same namespace as the Profile Intent ? I guess not. How about the case of the 'provides'

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the new

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Sorry folks. That's me. Looks like I missed a pom change. Simon

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Simon Laws wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Simon Laws wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Pass-by-value related SPI change

OK. I use org.apache.tuscany.sca.invocation.DataExchangeSemantics for now. The changes are checked in under r634778. Thanks, Raymond -- From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:20 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2067) URL Handling in Tuscany breaks when Tuscany is run under OSGi

URL Handling in Tuscany breaks when Tuscany is run under OSGi - Key: TUSCANY-2067 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2067 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2068) itest/osgi-implementation is broken due to recent changes

itest/osgi-implementation is broken due to recent changes - Key: TUSCANY-2068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2068 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2066) Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a null javabean result,throw a NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2066: - Assignee: Raymond Feng Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a null javabean

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2066) Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a null javabean result,throw a NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12576338#action_12576338 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2066: --- The patch for itest was applied under

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2066) Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a null javabean result,throw a NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2066. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed under r634779 Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1678) Would like to improve performance by not doing a PBVInvoker.copy in a couple cases where it's unnecessary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1678. --- Resolution: Fixed Add the DataExchangeSemantics SPI under r634778 Would like to improve

Tests for Tuscany running under OSGi

itest/osgi-tuscany contains tests for an OSGi-based Tuscany runtime. I haven't included the tests in itests/pom.xml because they need to create bundles corresponding to Tuscany, and hence require around 100 megabytes. Since we currently dont have other tests for a multi-classloader Tuscany

Re: Adding SPIs to handle policies, was: Re: Policy Handlers ?

Hi, I checked in changes that integrate the core with these new SPIs and converted logging and transaction policies under r634776. Can some of you look into the policy security too? Thanks, Raymond -- From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Hi, Sorry I missed one new file in the commit. Thanks Simon Laws for fixing it under r634807 ahead of me. I'm not sure how you magically recovered the file:-). Raymond -- From: Continuum VMBuild Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07,

Re: [Spec Related] 'provides' attribute in PolicySet

See below. On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinking a bit futher about this, I am wondering what would we expect for 'requires' attribute of a ProfileIntent. Do we assume that the intents required by the Profile Intent should also belong to the same

Re: Tuscany participation at Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2008

Luciano Resende wrote: Apache Software Foundation is participating in Google Summer of Code program [1] as a mentoring organization. I think this is a good opportunity for us and I'd like to use this thread to discuss possible innovative and challenging projects that could attract the students

Re: Tuscany participation at Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2008

Very good ideas, I have started collecting them in our wiki [1] and would be great if we could get some details together with each suggestion. Sebastien's suggestions look good as an example of explanation for the given project idea. Thanks and let's continue with the brainstorm [1]