I am trying to run HelloWorldWSClientTestCase in the helloworldwsclient sample.
For some reason, when I print the application scdl URL, obtained by "URL
applicationScdlURL = cl.getResource(applicationSCDL);" in SCATestCase, I get:
+++ application SCDL: jar:file:/C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Adm
So, the basic idea was that AccountDataServiceDASImpl should implement both
AccountDataService and CustomerIdService, but @Service was not able to
handle a list of more than one interface. Also notice that CustomerIdService
includes most of what is in AccountDataService instead of extending it,
Hmmm, this is interesting. I get a very similar exception trying to run the
helloworlswsclient sample (after renaming the test case so that it can be
run):
---
T E S T S
---
Running helloworl
OTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in JMS
across providers, not to mention programming languag
Comment inline.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than java serialization -
u need more information.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tuscany Dev"
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Testing async ws
Hi Raymond,
I'd like to proceed with testing async ws (includ
Hi Raymond,
I'd like to proceed with testing async ws (including ws/Axis2 callbacks). Two
requests: can you let me know when you are done with databinding changes so I
can pick up the latest? Second, what are you using to test sync axis binding,
helloworldws*?
>From a fresh checkout and after nuking my repo I get:
[INFO] -
---
[INFO] Building Apache Tuscany Simple WebApp Sample
[INFO]task-segment: [clean]
[INFO] ---
Just to touch base on this. I had a conversation with Jim and we agreed that
composite references, in particular those with a binding such as
Axis2Reference, will also be given an outbound wire so that they can use it
to add a DataBindingInterceptor.
In addition, instead of using an outbound i
Jeremy,
For async callbacks, your assumption is basically correct. The only item
that needs to be verified is ws/axis2 callbacks. The code is there as are a
couple of preliminary test cases. But in order to perform more rigorous
testing there was a dependency on the databinding framework that
complete
testing.
...ant
On 9/13/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-721?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-721:
---
Attachment: Axis2Callbacks.patch
This patch contains the main code and pre
operation could be
used, provided it can be gracefully extracted.
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA)"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-721) Adding support for callbacks over
bindings.axis2
[ http://issues.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-721?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-721:
---
Attachment: Axis2Callbacks.patch
This patch contains the main code and preliminary test cases added to the
existing ones. More testing
Axis Binding
Affects Versions: Java-M2
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-M2
Support for callbacks over Axis2 binding is added.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent
Hi Raymond,
Not to throw a wrench into this, but ws/Axis2 callbacks derive from the
current approach of Axis2TargetInvoker handling the invocation on the
ServiceClient's OperationClient and of it being created by Axis2Reference. I
don't think CompositeReference needs to be involved here as it
I noticed that the first statement in Axis2ServiceTestCase is 'if (true)
return;'. Any pointers into what the problem was that prompted bypassing the
test?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: CommentsOut.patch
Trivial change to remove some commented out code
> Composite references and services - model and runt
After getting a newer copy of axiom-api-SNAPSHOT.jar in my repo, to get rid of
a previous class not found error involving java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/axiom/om/util/StAXUtils, now I get the error below. Any help is
appreciated, as I am trying to get the Axis2 binding to build with
scheme.
Millisecond timestamp-based ids is only an initial try at it.
.. . . .. . . .
. . . .
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (914) 784 7003 Fax: (914) 784 6807
Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2006 02:48
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: RevisedInnerCompositeCallback.patch
This patch replaces InnerCompositeCallback2.patch. It integrates its contents
with the latest
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-706?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-706:
---
Attachment: RevisedCallbackChainsCorrelationAndRouting.patch
At issue creation time, it is possible to attach a file but there does not seem
to
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-Mx
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Attachments: RevisedCallbackChainsCorrelationAndRouting.patch
A revised
ewvc/incubator/synapse/trunk/java/modules/nhttp/
...ant
On 8/31/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, np.
The basic idea is to use (1) the wiring and connection infrastructure
that
is there (or shortly to be there once the patch is applied) for composite
references
omments
are welcome.
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Inner composite patch, was Re: Optiional Autowire
On 8/31/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am getting a good
Hi Jim,
Would you please let me know when you are done applying the inner composite
patch? Don't mean to rush you, but I'd rather wait until that is done before
I do another update, I imagine my current local sandbox would get pretty
messy if I update now ... ;-)
I am getting a good picture
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerCompositeCallback2.patch
This patch subsumes InnerCompositeCallback.patch. It incorporates local
invocations and callbacks
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-673?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-673:
---
Attachment: ImplementationCompositeLoaderAndTest.patch
> support scdlLocation attribute
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-673?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-673:
---
Attachment: ImplementationCompositeLoader.patch
> support scdlLocation attribute
;Still not
found");}
throw new MissingResourceException(name, e);
} finally {
thread.setContextClassLoader(oldCL);
}
}
----- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:12 PM
Subje
Trying to build any module, I get:
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] org.codehaus.plexus.archiver.AbstractArchiver.setForced(Z)V
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerCompositeCallback.patch
This newer patch subsumes InnerComposite.patch (assuming that the latter has
not been applied). It
Ok, yes, the recipe is getting more intricate every time, but I got the
samples to run now. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: New build break
I'm going to send out a separate mail dealing with h
ginal Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: New build break
On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, first, after mvn clean from the top and trying mvn -e from the top,
I get:
Th
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: New build break
Hi Ignacio,
The build runs fine for me. Did you try mvn clean first? Can you send a
stacktrace if it persists?
Jim
On Aug 25, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Ignacio S
The latest update, that updates a lot of the core/implementation/processors,
seems to be breaking a lot if not all of the sca samples. The way I see this is
by doing a mvn clean and mvn -e from the top, which breaks while running the
tests for the SDO impl, so then I go to sca/core and do mvn -e
FWIW, I also get this error, along with:
[surefire] Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.JAXBTestCase
[surefire] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.541 sec
[surefire]
[surefire] testTransform(org.apache.tuscany.databinding.JAXBTestCase) Time
elap
sed: 0.511 sec <<< ERROR!
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerComposite.patch
Here's a new patch that modifies CompositeBuilderTestCase to verify that the
Connector also work
I posted a new patch for this but have not received the corresponding email.
In case others are on the same boat, I append the text of the post.
Here's a new patch that modifies CompositeBuilderTestCase to verify that the
Connector also works for composite services and references.
This patch al
Ok, will try that.
Another question, any idea why a resource (a Java interface .class file)
would not be found? I get the exception:
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.501 sec
<<< FA
ILURE!
test(innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.471 sec <
n.composite
Hi,
The ImplementationCompositeLoader needs to be fixed to take a
"scdlLocation" attribute and set it to CompositeImplemention.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
TED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Can't load implementation.composite
Hi,
The ImplementationCompositeLoader needs to be fixed to take a
"scdlLocation" attribute and set it to CompositeImplemention.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
sca) but I
still get the NPE. Of course, this was just a guess. Any ideas?
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Can't load implementation.composite
Actually, my mistake, I
aunche
rImpl.java:190)
at org.apache.tuscany.test.SCATestCase.setUp(SCATestCase.java:65)
at
innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase.setUp(InnerCompositeTestCase.ja
va:30)
Trying to track it down, but just in case it rings a bell.
- Original Message -----
From: "Igna
e
Did you make sure that you added it to all of the three projects
(launcher, test and webapp-host)?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: Can't load implem
#x27;t have a good packaging story for the system
SCDLs).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tuscany Dev"
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:44 AM
Subject: Can't load implementation.composite
I am trying to run a more complete sample version of the inner composite test
case and I am getting the following exception:
Running innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.482 sec <<< FA
ILURE!
test(innercomposite.InnerCompositeTest
Hi Raymond, Jim,
Comments in line.
Ignacio
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Service, Reference and Binding models
On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think the SPI models for SC
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: CompositeRefsAndSvcs2.txt
In case first has not been applied, I added a piece to JDKWireService that I
forgot about to set the wire
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: CompositeRefsAndSvcs.txt
Here's the patch with the code to support composite reference and services.
> Composite refere
: New Feature
Components: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-Mx
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Support is added to represent composite references and services (those in a
composite and without a binding
gust 17, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Composite references - wiring and model and runtime
representations
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
One more thing. AIUI, the assembly spec defines a element as
containing a required reference URI. This means that getTarget and
setTa
ds to ServiceDefinition.
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Composite references - wiring and model and runtime
representations
Ok, so for issue (1) it seems that the bu
nd we can rename it if/when we find something
better. Of course, all this is up for debate, so let me know.
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Composite references - wiring
Raymond, thanks for the corrections, I was not using the latest spec and I
made up the nesting. I append my original note with the correct scdl to
restart the thread. As for your questions, (1) yes, the intention is that
InnerComposite be executed in the same address space as OuterComposite, and
One of the composite reference scenarios outlined by Jeremy has a local wire
between the Component and the Reference, and an external wire from the
CompositeComponent to a sibling Component or Reference (aka the "uncle"). For
instance:
http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
name="OuterC
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I have a feeling there may be some confusion here with
es around - for example,
CompositeComponent.addOutboundWire could just delegate down to the
appropriate CompositeReference (selected by name).
--
Jeremy
On Aug 11, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, ok, first off a bit of clarification on the terminology. When I say
loca
pdated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Sure, I want to make sure I understand what local callbacks (or plain
invocations for that matter) via references means.
I was defining a local callback as being a bidirectiona
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
Hi Ignacio,
I'm out today and tomorrow. Could you maybe post to he list and I'll try
and respond as soon as I have a chance to pick
Hi Jim,
When you have some time to chat, I have a few questions about references.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have time to chat some time today or tomorrow about where we are on
wiring, callbacks via references (local and remote), and conversational
support? I'm available for the next 1.5 hrs today and all day tomorrow
(except for a 1-2pm EDT mandatory meeting).
- Original Message -
From
7 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
I'll apply it. Sorry I disappeared this week but I had a personal thing
that came up...In the meantime, have a good vacation and ping when you
are back.
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wro
x27;ll look into it tonight.
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, done. Forgot to add them to version control, apologies.
- Original Message - From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [jira]
h is missing the following classes:
JavaMappedCallback and IllegalCallbackException
Can you just attach the classes to the JIRA issue (no need to patch)?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all ]
Ignacio Si
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-585:
---
Attachment: CallbackPatch.txt
Including JavaMappedCallback and IllegalCallbackException that had not been
added to version control, apologies
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-585:
---
Attachment: CallbackPatch.txt
Patch with code and sample attached
> Initial support for callba
ing an implementation processor
Hi Ignacio,
Can you create a JIRA and attach the code so I can take a look?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a
CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when v
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor
to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I
added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's
createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to
META-INF/tu
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Initial support for local callbacks is provided, along with a simple callback
sample
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact
I was seeing a similar error as Rick, I updated and picked up the fix and
now I see the following error, after which the build hangs (suspecting a
deadlock now):
[surefire] Running
org.apache.tuscany.core.services.work.jsr237.Jsr237WorkSchedu
lerTestCase
[surefire] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0,
I have an initial pass at a replacement for one-way
async support using a target invoker rather than an interceptor. I have been
able to test it in chianti and ported it to the latest trunk. For some reason
having to do with SCA SPI test failures, I can't successfully build the man
trunk yet
onentBuilder -> JcaWorkScheduler
-> GeronimoWorkManager. The gist is for the work scheduler to abstract
the work management implementation mechanism.
hth
Meeraj
-----Original Message-
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 July 2006 16:37
To: Tuscany Dev
Subject: Re: WorkManager in Ja
I'm a bit confused by this. I added:
to system.scdl as per Jim's directions, did a mvn clean and mvn of sca and
nothing seems to be happening (I even do a mvn clean and mvn of the top to
no avail). Not sure whether or where I should be adding the code below by
Meeraj. Here's where I autowi
1:45 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
To allow JavaAtomicComponent to create a new AsyncJavaTargetInvoker, it
needs to supply the new target invoker with a work manager. My first try
(which may not be the appropriate thing to do) was to get a work manager
autowired into JavaComponentBuilder, whic
To allow JavaAtomicComponent to create a new AsyncJavaTargetInvoker, it needs
to supply the new target invoker with a work manager. My first try (which may
not be the appropriate thing to do) was to get a work manager autowired into
JavaComponentBuilder, which then passes it to JavaAtomicCompone
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-550?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-550:
---
Attachment: supplychain.zip
Attaching zip with sample
> Supply chain sample for chia
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Upgrading supply chain sample to work with new version of spec under chianti
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
I am trying to get the supply chain sample to work on chianti to have a test
case for the one-way rework based on the callback discussion. I copied the
supplychain dir from the main trunk and changed pom.xml, the stand-alone client
and the test case, and I moved sca.module to default.scdl under
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Oisin Hurley wrote:
Yes I was counting on the binding (e.g. Celtix, Axis) to provide RM
capabilities. However, w
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
5. Also, Ignacio, could you also detail more on if you think
TargetInvoker's need a non-blocking invoke method and why there may be
different on
Hi Jim,
An inline comment on your first point.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
Hi guys,
I won't be able to make IRC today but please feel free to go ahead and
discuss conversat
Apologies for the false alarm, still getting used to the wiki. I have
attached the slides there as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
I am attaching a
I too think that having a work manager implementation that minimizes
dependencies (e.g., Geronimo's)
is a useful thing to have. Wrt using a work manager in the support for
callbacks, we should
just make sure that we are ok with the overall architecture first. At his
point, it looks like the loca
Hi Jim,
Sorry about the disconnect, I was out Monday and yesterday. I'll be sure to
attend the IRC chat tomorrow. In the meantime, some more quick comments.
- Original Message -
If I understand correctly, would a system service transport use a
low level
communication mechanism, lik
Apologies Jeremy, didn't mean to exclude people, just trying
to expedite the discussion.
The first basic issue I see is how to incorporate callbacks as
defined in the C&I spec in particular, and bi-directional interfaces
in general, into the Tuscany architecture. Depending on how closely a
Jim,
Perhaps we could discuss this via a more immediate medium. How about IRC or
phone? I am online today until 5pm EDT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I'd like to start working on providing support for callbacks, ass
I'd like to start working on providing support for callbacks, assuming the
sandbox is a good place to do this. Currently, I am focusing on local,
stateless callbacks to begin with. Later, and assuming that conversational
support is in place (which I am also keen on contributing to) I can work on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=comments#action_12412970
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-270:
Ok, never mind the previous comment on purchase stock. Of course,
purchaseLotNumber is generated, so the data
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=comments#action_12412968
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-270:
In stock sell, it turns out that the DAS select command issued by the data
service was not including symbol and
I am getting the following build error:
[INFO] -
[INFO] Building Tuscany Celtix Binding
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO] -
...
[INFO] --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-270:
---
Attachment: async-bigbank-mediator.txt
Here's an updated diff file that addresses Rick's request to make the logger
behave more tra
I am getting the following build failure on mvn clean from the top after an
update. Any ideas?
[INFO] -
---
[INFO] Building Tuscany BigBank Account Module
[INFO]task-segment: [clean]
[INFO] ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-270:
---
Attachment: async-bigbank-new.txt
I just realized that I missed one file in the previous attachment
(accountLog.jsp in webclient/src/main
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-270:
---
Attachment: async-bigbank.txt
> Bigbank sample should demonstrate the SCA async
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=comments#action_12383405
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-270:
I am attaching a diff file with sample code. A logger service is used by the
account service to async'
I am trying to mvn clean testing/tomcat and I am getting the following build
error. I have the latest code (just did an update) and mvn clean and mvn -e
from the top build successfully. Any ideas?
[INFO] -
---
[ERROR] BUILD
Ok, never mind. If I'm not mistaken, the schema in AccountService.wsdl is
also used for this purpose, sorry for the self-answered question ...
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: S
Excuse my ignorance, but I am trying to figure out how the sdo-source for
bigbank/account gets generated. I am assuming (of course, I could be wrong)
that there should be a specification file somewhere in the sample. So far, I
can only find DasAccountConfiguration.xml in
bigbank/account/src/mai
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but is something like
@Service(interfaces={Int1.class,Int2.class}) supported in the current code? I
tried to add one more interface to AccountDataServiceDASImpl. I don't get any
problem at build time, but at run time the instance this class configured into
AccountService
301 - 400 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
