?
On 8/8/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sebastien, thanks. I've figured out all of this already :) Just
the one hanging thing - the definitions.xml is an artifact that might
have to be picked up by the contribution service. While processors
for all other documents could
Hi,
Now that I have the basic policy model in place I am trying to link
up this with the assembly model now.
The policy intents and policy sets applicable for a domain are defined
in the definitions.xml. There is a SCADefinitions processor that
deals with reading and resolving the intents and
I've verified the signatures for the src and bin distros and they seem
fine. The License file mentions 'Apache Jackarta'... while I think it
is 'Apache Jakarta'. Maybe this very minor thing could be fixed for
the next release.
So over all, here is my +1 for this release.
Thanks
- Venkat
On
Hi Raymond,
I had wrapped up a local increment to the Policy module and tried to
check it in. However, I find that there are modifications that you
had checked in. With those modifications, the work that I did in
policy-xml broke :).
I'd need some help to merge what I have done with what you
.
* The IntentImpl.hashCode() should be based on the name
* Move getRequiredIntents() from Intent to ProfileIntent
* The resolved intent will be kept in the collection before the clear() is
called
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Hi Ant... thanks for bringing this up again. Yes, the week ending Aug
17th seems good if we plan to release end of August.
I'd prefer 0.95 for the next release.
- Venkat
On 8/3/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the SCA 0.91 release
- Original Message -
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 7:24 AM
Subject: [Spec Related] 'provides' attribute in PolicySet
Hi,
In the specs for the PolicyFwk, the xsds mention the 'provides'
attribute
Hi,
In the specs for the PolicyFwk, the xsds mention the 'provides'
attribute for a 'policySet' as optional. If this attribute is not
specified how does one figure out which intent a particular policySet
actually provides for. Could somebody help me with clarity on this,
please?
Thanks
-
these as part of
the extension SPI?
...ant
On 7/29/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is the definitions.xml (sec 1.8, line 2490 of Assembly spec) a good
place to define the domain uri for various schemes for an SCA Domain.
- Venkat
On 7/28/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL
before I commit the changes.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/22/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Sebastien. I'll try to use this now and see how things go.
- Venkat
On 6/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Would we also need to post
ModelResolver.resolve(theDeployedArtifact).
But I'll wait to see the code.
On 7/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Sebastien / Luciano,
I have this going in my local. But I've had to pass the
ContributionFactory down
Thanks Sebastien. Will go ahead and check in the changes now.
- Venkat
On 7/31/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Luciano, you are right... here is the code snippet that I have added
to the CompositeProcessor.resolve
Hi,
I was recently looking into
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1343 and I am able to
relate well with all of what is being discussed here. From whatever I
understand from that JIRA it is desired that the package-processor
that is processing an SCA contribution be given the
Hi,
Is the definitions.xml (sec 1.8, line 2490 of Assembly spec) a good
place to define the domain uri for various schemes for an SCA Domain.
- Venkat
On 7/28/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Hi,
I'd like the release guide if the steps we follow are a bit different
than what is normally done or if there are some variations to how we
perform some steps. But if we were just about going to rephrase all
of what has already been said somewhere else I'd prefer just about
having a pointer
HI,
Now that the 0.91 release is out, I am going to merge the changes that
we done to the branch during the release, over to the trunk. As of
now here are the areas that I am considering for a merge
- distribution (since we've went about quite a few changes to this
during this release... I'll
Hello Everybody,
The Apache Tuscany Team are pleased to announce the 0.91-incubating release
of the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
Application Development which are being
+1. since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used
with wsdls.
- Venkat
On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
internally to the
Hi,
I am taking a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1426 and to get to the
crux of that problem I am first trying to see if wsdl imports work.
Here is what I am attempting. There is B.wsdl that imports A.wsdl,
where B.wsdl has the bindings and services defined and A.wsdl
as well and add the schema elements in there
to this XMLSchemaCollection. Doing this seems to get the imports
going for now. Not sure if this is the right thing to do.
- Venkat
On 7/19/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am taking a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Every commit is good to know to keep track of whats going on. But it
would be good if this mail just about provided a link like this
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewchangessincelastlogin.action?pageId=54462
which is actually the diff between two versions, than churn out all
Thanks Raymond.
On 7/18/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have merged the fix from trunk into 0.91 branch under r557146. We can pull
it into RC4 if we decide the re-spin.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
from the maven staging repo for this release.
For future releases, if we wish to have them in the maven repo, we
must fix the build as well to include the relevant legal files.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Release vote for Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating
Thank you, Ant.
On 7/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is now in place and changes to the Tuscany cwiki now have emails sent
to tuscany-commits
...ant
On 7/17/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant,
Please drop an email to apmail AT apache.org.
thanks,
dims
+1 Sounds lot of sense to me. Maybe when commenting out it would be
good to include the number of the JIRA that has been opened for this.
- Venkat
On 7/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I checked the itest/pom.xml and saw quite a few
Seems ok to me since we will only be extending and not disrupting what
exists already. And extending too seems ok since we are adding in a
substantial feature here - support for management functions.
- Venkat
On 7/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, RuntimeComponent sounds good to
+1 for each subproject to have its own.. unless we want to consciously
tie in some commonality through this between the subprojects.
- Venkat
On 7/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is cool and helpful. Thanks for doing this. I am happy about this.
- Venkat
On 7/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fyi, I've taken the liberty of setting up Google blog alerts to send us msgs
when sca or tuscany are found to be mentioned on someones blog, hope no one
minds. Can
Release vote for Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating RC3 has passed with
5 binding +1 and no -1s.
Votes from :
Venkatakrishnan
Anthony Elder
Simon Laws
Raymond Feng
Luciano Resende
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/12/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again :),
Please review and vote
Hi,
Yes it seem ok to have both of these defined as there is order of
precedence that has been llaid out. I am sort of able to fit this
with the general scheme of overriding that has been specified for
various artifacts.
- Venkat
On 7/14/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Ant.
It
Hi Kelvin,
I will send your credentials to your mail id.
- Venkat
On 7/13/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the few things I have truly lost in my recent hard drive crash was my
login details for the tuscany wiki. They seem to have been saved in my
firefox browser and
+1 from me too.
- Venkat
On 7/13/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita Vadhavkar has been helping DAS for couple months and recently
also started to help on SDO and had contributed many patches. I'd like
to give her developer access to JIRA so she can manage JIRAs with more
will be getting this RC3 out for vote today.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/10/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Release vote for Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating RC2 has passed with
5 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1 and no -1s.
Votes from :
Venkatakrishnan
Simon Laws
Anthony Elder
Luciano Resende
Raymond
Hi Dennis,
Thanks for you interest in Tuscany and eager to see you on our
Mailinglists. Here is information on how you can subscribe to the
tuscany dev list.
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/mailing-lists.html.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/10/07, O'Flynn, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please
Hi again :),
Please review and vote on the 0.91 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java. (RC3).
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscany/0.91-rc3/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
Maven staging repository.
Release vote for Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating RC2 has passed with
5 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1 and no -1s.
Votes from :
Venkatakrishnan
Simon Laws
Anthony Elder
Luciano Resende
Raymond Feng
Simon Nash (non-binding)
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 7/6/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
Here are my observations on this RC.
1) The source builds successfully from a clean maven repo
- Notice, Disclaimer and License files missing from source 'rdb' module.
2) Trying the samples
a) I see that the source has two additional directories 'testing' and
'dbconfig'
would suggest either
improving or removing the feed-aggregator sample. However, I don't
think this is serious enough to delay the release, so here's my
+1 (non-binding).
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On 7/6/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 0.91
as OSGi bundles. I think that OSGi is in a different space than
other runtimes and that supporting it is a good idea.
Other comments inline...
Yours, Mike
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
This seems ok since you say it does not have side effects for other
consumers. However, I wonder if we can
Hi,
This seems ok since you say it does not have side effects for other
consumers. However, I wonder if we can keep doing this for accomodating
other runtimes as well - am not sure what the others might want or if they'd
need something not as simple as this - just postulating here ;-). Or,
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 0.91 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscany/0.91-rc2/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
Maven staging repository.
The SVN tag
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.91-rc2-incubatingand
On 7/5/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was intending to send Java SCA RC2 for a vote but it happens that
minotaur
is down and I cannot stage RC2. So, meanwhile it would be great if people
can
I don't see any reason why you should not open them up a bit instead of
duplicating code. Especially now that we associate various objects by
interface types, opening them will help in reusing them by substituting
different implementations for such associations.
- Venkat
On 7/3/07, Simon Laws
.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/2/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Simon. Let me go fix these things. Will call out for help when
needed. :)
- Venkat
On 7/2/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/07, Venkata Krishnan
)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
SurefireBooter.java:290)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(
SurefireBooter.java:818)
On 7/3/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on fixing the points raised by Ant and Simon
Thanks Simon. Let me go fix these things. Will call out for help when
needed. :)
- Venkat
On 7/2/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 0.91
Hi,
I am looking at the Policy Framework and shall update the wiki on the
specifics soon. Once this is done to some level, I'd also like to help a
bit with the ws-* things (may be WS-Security to start with) that Ant has
listed on the wiki page.
- Venkat
On 6/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I tried out the source and binary distributions and here are some
observations: -
Source Distro
- In the license file there is a mention of Tuscany SDO and Eclipse license,
but am not able to figure out a distribution of these packages. If we are
not distributing them
Hi,
I really like the approach mentioned under '3'. While the SPIs might
undergo changes sometime, this is probably too early, especially now that we
have promised for its stability from Release 0.90. Thats just about my
opinion. Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/2/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 0.91 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscany/0.91-rc1/
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.91-rc1-incubating/
Hello Everybody,
In the next few hours I am going to start with cutting of the first RC for
SCA Release 0.91. Hence I request you to kindly hold back any check-ins to
the branch -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-0.91 -
until I get back about the RC on the
Folks, I am not able to pull this off today due to some real bizzare
experiences with 'searching and replacing the SNAPSHOT' and then with the
SVN commits as well. I'd definitely get this out tomorrow. My apologies
for this delay.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/27/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
Here is where distros that are intended for SCA Release 0.91 have been put
up for a quick review.
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/Rel_0.91/
I request a review of these distros from you folks. I plan to cut an RC
this Wednesday or Thursday based on the review comments. These distros
Yes, I am aware of Fuhwei Lwo's contribution to some extent and he'd get my
whole-hearted nod.
Here is my +1.
- Venkat
On 6/26/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose Fuhwei Lwo as a Tuscany Committer.
According to my gmail archive he has, since mid of 2006, posted
Hi,
I have cleaned up the branch and the corresponding parts in the trunk to fix
for missing header files. Here is an updated RAT report.
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Hi.. I have reverted back on the breaking changes and have the trunk
building now. Thanks to Sebastien :) for pointing out the information
related to svn merges on anther thread on this ML - that was helpful.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/25/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I might
Hi, I might have just about broken the trunk accidently commiting some half
baked changes to the policy module alongside with some fixes for license
headers. I am right now fixing it. I regret and apologize for this
inconvenience.
Thanks
- Venkat
I am yet to try this out but then from what I read, this sounds good and
useful as it would determine how fast we can bring up the runtime.
Thanks for doing this :)
- Venkat
On 6/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
There has been many
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1365
On 6/22/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I assume there is going to be just about 'one' ODE instance which might
be
running several processes that are implementations of different
components
in a deployment. Is the ODE server something that we
from the contribution scope will always be on the unresolved status
,and would need further processing.
On 5/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The property value definition for a component can have an attribute
named
'file' that points
.
- Venkat
On 6/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Yes... I guess it should be possible to have them. I'd say, at the
least
that we have a readme that describes the demo layout, what its intent
is and
how you get to run it. I guess this is something
a question inline.
scabooz wrote:
Venkat,
comments embedded...
- Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Policy Framework Impl. in Tuscany
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I am keen
Yes... I guess it should be possible to have them. I'd say, at the least
that we have a readme that describes the demo layout, what its intent is and
how you get to run it. I guess this is something we have already done for
the samples.
- Venkat
On 6/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL
Hi Simon, the aggregator demo seemed to throw classdefnotfound exception for
javax.servlet. ServletException.
I guess it would be good to release the demos to give people a better feel
of how things work.
- Venkat
On 6/21/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can speak for the following
This would be good to get users one step forward with respect to using SCA.
A good tool to have would be one that validates a composite assembly -
against the xsds and then for overall consistency. I know we do quite a bit
of the latter as part of the artifact processing but wonder if it would
.
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Luciano,
This is a surprise :)... I was planning on taking the 0.91 brn tomorrow
and
imediately start getting out RCs to vote on, but I can't do that if it
needs
to include the DAS beta1 release???.
What do people think?
- Venkat
On 6/18/07, Luciano
for the others
and get back.
- Venkat
On 6/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have cut a branch for the 0.91 release and have changed over the
artifact
versions to 0.91-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I am now trying to build
/20/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess the changes after beta1 are to do with some restructuring of
classes across packages. Also when I rolled back the SDO DB back to beta1,
it seems to build fine with just changes to the package names it was using.
So seems like beta1
Hi,
I guess it should be a good start to have SCA domains span across runtimes
and leave the runtimes being shared by SCA domains to the next iteration.
As for the second point, is there a possibility of seeing this as
replication of components across two runtimes instead of nodes? Anyways, to
On 6/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Ant. So could we all please use this wiki page to put down
things
that are going to be increments over 0.90.
Also I run the RAT on the trunk - just java/sca and here is the
report. I
intend to go and fix
On 6/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has the
same name as the implementation file but has the
Hi,
Yes, I'd feel that it could end up being non-compliant and we might lose a
bit on portability as well. Since an implementation could be reused across
a bunch of components, having the componentType go after the component may
not work.
I'd say that we leave the componentType resolution to
to do that as well.
Most of the code for those is close-ish to being done, though there's
still
a whole lot of related sample work to get done.
I'd started a wiki page for 0.91 at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents
...ant
On 6/13/07, Venkata
Hi Mike,
I agree we need to put some information on the Home page of the TUSCANYWIKI,
related to how the wiki is to be used - alteast earmark some place in the
page hierarchy under which discussion pages should go and how content for
website should be contributed.
As far as the copying of pages
to the website through this wiki?
Thanks,
Haleh
On 6/13/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have created the Tuscany Wiki space now on confluence -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Index.
Mike, I need help with copying the pages over from TUSCANY
Hi,
I am keen on adding further to the Policy support thats in Tuscany today. I
recently run thro the Policy Framework specs and was looking into Tuscany on
how far we had gone on this. Here's my understanding of all that. I
request people's perspective on my understanding before I go ahead
Hi, I have the admin access now. I am able to see the 'Create Space' option
on the dashboard now. Before I go ahead let me conform the following
- We are going to create a space named 'Tuscany Wiki' with key 'TUSCANYWIKI'
- All contents of the present wiki space 'TUSCANY' will be copied over
Thanks for the faith and encouragement. This is going to be my first
experience and I am sure of getting all the help from you folks to pull this
off successfully.
So, to start with, I propose to cut a branch around June 20th, 2007. If
people are ok with this, then all that we'd like to be a
Hi Mike, I have added your id in as 'confluence-administrators'.
- Venkat
On 6/13/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano,
Only just spotted your request in the emails
My user ID is edwardsmj
Do I need to send this directly to infra, or will you handle it?
Yours, Mike.
HI Mike,
I have already added you id as 'confluence administrator' which I've
mentioned on another thread on the ML. Could you please try and let me know
if it works. Thanks.
- Venkat
On 6/13/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
So what's with the Edit access to the Tuscany
that
for placing code into trunk, as mentioned on some other emails...
Yours, Mike.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi, I have the admin access now. I am able to see the 'Create Space'
option
on the dashboard now. Before I go ahead let me conform the following
- We are going to create a space named 'Tuscany
I was wanting to take Luciano's help to make my id admin. Since he is not
available I've just about posted to infra to add my id as confluence admin.
As mentioned on the IRC last night I'd like to check up after I get admin
privelges, if this can be done by us or should have to only go thro
Hi Luciano, since you now have the admin previleges on confluence could you
please grant us admin previleges. My id is 'svkrish'. Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/9/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkat, Mike, infra is asking for your confluence user ids, could you
please provide this
+1 from me - sounds very useful especially if distributions are going to be
available.
- Venkat
On 6/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Wouldn't that fail if you start from a clean repo ? It expects the
other modules to be built or available as
When we do this, we should also be asking for 'administrator' access for a
couple of us atleast so that we could give Hernan a break on somethings such
as a manual autoexport. Thanks.
- Venkat
On 6/6/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok Hernan, thanks for your advice on this, I guess
Yes - confluence admin. Ok for now shall I go ahead and raise requests for
Admin previleges for me and Luciano ?
- Venkat
On 6/6/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK so,
I'll raise a JIRA against infrastructure asking for a new space to act as
our wiki:
Name: Apache Tuscany Wiki
of documentations for each project?
Haleh
On 6/2/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Haleh, please see my comments inline.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/1/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see a difference and in fact it is more work.
In today's mode: you update one
good now, much better than before, but IMHO that
doesn't mean its perfect or that we should try to restrict or control any
future changes to it.
...ant
On 6/5/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've added more to this guidelines page. Please take a look and see if
it
all
Hi,
Though I haven't looked deep into the simplifications I really feel it would
be better to have them as part of the SPIs than as an optional thing outside
it. As a developer I'd be more inclined to look up the SPIs and go on than
look over the SPIs for additional utils or helpers. Just as
Hi Simon,
If you are asking for the export from
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY to
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/ I guess its based on change activity. I am
not sure about the export to http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany.
Luciano, could you please help with some info on
Hi Ant,
I was trying to avoid the uri scheme and thought this to be a sure way to
keep out errors - getting explicit inputs for each. But then, this just
about manages only the defaults for host and port. So, I am open to
implementing your suggestion and understand it could be more consistent
is coming from where and this sync details.
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany
On 6/4/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
If you are asking for the export from
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY to
http
are using the same content from
SCA+Java+0.90-incubating?
Cheers!
Hernan
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
I also observe some changes not being reflected on the wiki exported
site.
Maybe the autoexport is not happening and we might have to do a manual
export. Luciano, do you by any chance have
to the page so we can take a look.
On 6/1/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Haleh,
I am trying to re-org the downloads / release page for the following
reason
:--
Currently the SCA Release pages points to two things i) Latest Release
ii)
Previous Releases. In the Latest
in about 2 mins
Cheers!
Hernan
Luciano Resende wrote:
Why it shows in [1] and not in [2] ?
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/home.html
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/
On 5/31/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've changed the home page to include a box
Hi Kelvin, I've just added one more menu item 'SCA Java Home' to link back
to the home page of the subproject. Will do the same for DAS and SDO as
well, now.
Also I am going to see if we can get the other downloads pages (M2 ones) to
look the same as the current one.
- Venkat
On 6/1/07,
include 0.91 page to the 'Latest Release' section and then include '
0.90' page to the 'Previous Releases' list.
I feel this is maintainable in the long run. Hope I am no missing something
in all of this
- Venkat
On 6/1/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin, I've just added one
with
all the old downloads?
...ant
On 5/30/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
What we are attempting to do now it really far better than cluttering
all
the downloads together on one page. Here is what I think about this
- for every Release (SCA / SDO / DAS) have a separate page
Hi,
I can vouch for how useful the current host implementations have been during
the development and testing cycle. So +1 for a host-jms.
- Venkat
On 5/31/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use the
same
strategy: if
to from the General menu box
could
be expanded to have links to each of the current download pages (the
above
SCA+Java+0.90-incubating etc) and at the bottom another link to a page
with
all the old downloads?
...ant
On 5/30/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
What we
301 - 400 of 731 matches
Mail list logo
