[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500161
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1233:
-
I'm working through this patch, and feeling a little
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1233:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499773
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1305:
-
Steffen,
it does look like a bug. The AccountImpl's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson reassigned TUSCANY-1233:
---
Assignee: Kelvin Goodson
Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499819
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1305:
-
The issue here is that the generated code creates the metadata
I'm just trying to commit a fix for TUSCANY-1305, and so went to build with
maven. All the tests run fine in eclipse, but in maven the impl project's
tests hang indefinitely in DeserializationNoSchemaTestCase. Has anyone else
seen this? My impl and lib projects are up to date at revision
after a
long timeout. I guess the fact that it is not enable in the test suite
means that it perhaps ought to be named something other than *TestCase in
order that it is disable in the maven execution too, yes?
Kelvin.
On 29/05/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just trying to commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1305.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-1.0
resolved at revision 542588
Hi Hernan,
Welcome to Tuscany! and thanks very much for offering to help us out
with this.
--
Kelvin.
On 24/05/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkat,
I'm helping with the documentation and web site for the Geronimo project.
We recently moved the authoring of our web site to
Ant,
I changed the dependency versions, and I added incubating to the version
tags of the CTS artifacts. I still suffer from the issue that I get 0 tests
run in my maven environment, but I get 100% success when running the tests
in eclipse. Can you please update and rerun in maven and let me
Hi, just spotted that you were already running with the incubating
version, so there's a mystery why there is a failing test. Can you let me
have the surefire report please?
Kelvin.
On 23/05/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CTS code pom.xml's currently use SDO version
/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Release+Process
On 5/22/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think my proposal is consistent with your desire to get the
overview.
When entering the new release phase, all JIRAs fixed in the period
since
the last release would be reclassified to the newly
On 21/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator
Tuscany
page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while
to get reflect on the live website.
[1]
Java SDO has been doing this using an Java-SDO-Mx release rather than
Java-SDO-Next, but as I said on IRC I think the Next naming is much better.
I propose that we adopt the policy that no-one other than a release manager
ever assigns anything other than a *Next value for the fix release of a
the JIRA overview
page which is something I've found useful and have used it in past releases
to manage what things need to get done. See
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY
Maybe just more knowledge about how the versions get used would be enough?
...ant
On 5/22/07, kelvin goodson
This is in part feedback on the SCA release candidate that ant posted, but
doesn't require a respin, so I won't muddy the vote thread for this.
If I try to verify an archive in the release candidate with gpg --verify
archivename it tells me it cant find the public key.
I had this issue before
Ant,
I've had a good poke around and built the source distro and run the tests
successfully. The only potential blocking issue I have found is that absence
of a STATUS file, which it was my understanding should be copied in from
the project's STATUS file into every distribution, but I haven't
Have done that now too. It didn't occur to me that it had changed, but of
course we switched from 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Kelvin.
On 20/05/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
done
What about commonj:sdo
done
Kelvin.
On 19/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone working with SDO publish new snapshots ? The ones available
in
the maven repo today is about a month old and has some inconsistencies
with
current trunk code, this cause issues for those who would like to build
Switching this to tuscany-users to solicit user community input.
I think I need some clarification of what it means to ship the samples
with the binary distribution. One of the key things a user is going to
want to do is to modify and rebuild the samples, so how do we make
that easy for them?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1212:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1)
Java-SDO-Mx
were not part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1250:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1)
Java-SDO-Mx
were not part
Hello, and thanks for the feedback. From the SDO perspective ..
snip/
- I don't currently see any support in the XSD2JavaGenerator for
specifying the package name of any imported namespace in a schema. You can
specify the package name for the schema you are currently generating objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496509
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1290:
-
It appears that this might be a local maven repository issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1290:
Comment: was deleted
Databinding-sdo broken with SDO beta1 relesae and lastest SDO
16th May 2007:
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its
1.0-incubating-beta1 release
of SDO (Service Data Objects) Java.
You can download binary and source distributions from:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/
Maven artifacts for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496232
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171:
-
When moving the maven artifacts from the staging repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1233:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1)
Java-SDO-Mx
Enhance SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1171.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Announce made today
SDO Java beta1 Release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1272.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-DAS-Mx)
Java
I propose to move a number of test cases from the under review suite to the
adopted suite in the coming days.
I think we can adopt the ContainmentTest tests and consolidate them into the
DataObject tests that are already part of the adopted set. So I have moved
the contents of DataObjectTest into
Hi Chris,
I don't see this failure when I run against a 1.4.2 environment ...
java version 1.4.2_07
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_07-b05, mixed mode)
Which implementation / version of the JDK are you using?
Luciano,
Looking at this now.
Kelvin.
On 14/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if something got changed on SDO and how it track deletes
?
Even tough nothing got changed on that area in DAS, looks like some test
cases are now failing, and looks like the issue is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494672
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1252:
-
I added the requested resources in revision 536780, however
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1241.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
Merged Brian's updates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1252.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Having copied across files to fix the adopted suite of tests
Hi Chris,
the code snippet you supplied doesn't compile against the code that I
generated. Person's dog Property is isMany=true so to add a dog you need to
do person.getDog().add(aDog)
Regards, kelvin.
On 10/05/07, Chris Mildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a little
Chris,
I don't see this field being generated at all. I'm generating using code
from the SDO trunk. Which version of SDO are you using?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 10/05/07, Chris Mildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having issues generating static SDOs from my schema. The schema can
be
Affects Versions: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
Reporter: Kelvin Goodson
Some users report on the tuscany-dev mailing list that 0 tests execute when
running the CTS using maven as described in the instructions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email
May 2007 09:07
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse
On 5/3/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
BTW We still have the issue that many of us don't see any test run under
maven, which is not a show-stopper but would
)
at
org.eclipse.emf.ecore.util.BasicFeatureMap.add(BasicFeatureMap.java:1071
)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.BasicSequence.add(BasicSequence.java:105)
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of kelvin goodson
Sent: 04 May 2007 10:06
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Ah,
of course the BasicSequence belongs to Tuscany, so the EMF source code
attachment was a red herring sorry, but it still remains the fact that we
have differnet version of that code.
Kelvin.
On 04/05/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another Hmmm moment,
the only insight I can
(BasicFeatureMap.java:1071
)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.BasicSequence.add(BasicSequence.java:105)
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of kelvin goodson
Sent: 04 May 2007 10:06
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493643
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241:
-
Brian, thanks for the update. I merged the updates you
As we are reorganising the CTS right now, how about we begin put a small
javadoc comment on test classes and if appropriate on test cases with a link
to the page of the spec that the class/test case refers to. For example
that can be done with the pdf that is on the OSOA website using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493372
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241:
-
Brian, thanks for this. I have had a good look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493391
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241:
-
Hi Brian,
So far I have applied all but a handful
An issue that is causing a little trouble is that we don't have good
instructions on how to set up and run the CTS tests inside eclipse, and I
have an insight into that that I'd like to share.
We must ensure that the sdo-2.1cts project remains free of any reference to
tuscany.
The device by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493034
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171:
-
Here's an example command I used to copy repository artifacts
.
In my view this means that API tests etc should be performed on a
variety of dataobject creation mechanisms and paramatized tests are
the way to go.
cheers,
Robbie.
On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having spent some time getting to grips with the CTS there are some
Many thanks for your prompt attention. So now we have 15+1s, 1 non binding,
3 IPMC binding and no -1s I think we can confidently declare this vote
closed.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 01/05/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Having spent some time getting to grips with the CTS there are some things I
think I'd like to improve.
First amongst them is to get some structure that allows us to get a feel for
how well the spec is covered by the tests. One thing that concerns me is
that one of the most apparent things in
to generate them,
if it will help I'll volunteer to sort that out for the next release?
...ant
On 4/26/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java
The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive
distribution
://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/
http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/repo/commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/
On 01/05/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks ok, +1
...ant
On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
think things should be different before I get too far along the way with
this change.
I also just moved ActiveUpdatingTest into the adopted suite.
Kelvin.
On 27/04/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a small dig around I'm not sure how best to approach this slight
conundrum
After a small dig around I'm not sure how best to approach this slight
conundrum.
After putting in place some infrastructure to begin ensuring that we have a
fresh type scope (HelperContext instance) per test case for the simple test
case runs I turned my attention to a test class in the
address as on the CLA).
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
Kelvin.
On 23/04/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006, in particular in the area
Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java
The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution
files are posted here at [1]
The maven repository artifacts are posted in a staging repository [2]
code to fit their requirements. This does seem like
an edge case and it would seem appropriate for those users to invest the
effort to solve the problem rather than putting an extra burden on
developing the general purpose CTS.
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1171:
Summary: SDO Java beta1 Release (was: SDO Java M3 Release)
SDO Java beta1 Release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1230.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
applied Andy's patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1232.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
Applied Andy's patch, thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1235.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
added new tests to under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491575
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171:
-
In the move to a beta1 version i created a 1.0-incubating-beta1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1211:
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-beta1
SDO 2.1 feature: On-the-fly creation of open content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1216:
Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1)
Java-SDO-M2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-826:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Mx)
Java-SDO-beta1
Affects
discussion on incubator general).
I'm just about to figure out how to create/configure the repo, but any tips
on the process for making the maven repo are welcome; I'll post back my
findings.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/beta1/RC1/
Kelvin.
On 24/04/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL
]
On 25/04/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java
release
candidate in the style if the last one [1], but that's only part
Ant,
your note is well timed as I've had a couple of off-line chats with people
in the last week about release naming, particularly with regard to the
effect that a milestone or alpha name can have on uptake of a release. In
the IRC chat of 16th April [1] we reached a conclusion that given the
to the
mapping of base64binary. How does that sound?
Kelvin.
On 24/04/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having looked at XSDChoiceTest I think it's fine for moving to the adopted
suite. Any comments?
Also I've been looking at Andy's patch for TUSCANY-1224, and the fixes
seem fine. As Andy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1224.
-
Resolution: Fixed
applied patch, but commented out assertions concerning base64binary
There are a number of CTS tests in the under review bucket that Tuscany is
failing because the assertions tested prior Tuscany behaviour, rather than
spec constraints. e.g. SequenceTest.testGetProperty.
These assertions are of the form get property by index and ensure its the
same as getting it
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation. He ...
- been active in
harder to re-use these tests
from other frameworks in their current form. If we want to stick to the
simple junit 3.8 style then these tests will need some refactoring.
Regards,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2007 11:03
To: tuscany
A quick correction on my previous note which reflects a bias towards the
junit 3.8 approach that I didn't really intend.
some static code that performed any real startup overhead and cached the
helper. This all leads me to believing that to get true agnosticism wrt the
test harness we should
The Junit tooling is so useful I'd be loath to drop it as the harness that
the Tuscany implementation uses for exercising the tests. I'm going to do a
bit of playing to see what solutions are practical, but I'm concerned that
we may be considering putting significant effort into a goal that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489977
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1181:
-
Dan,
I looked at this again and have decided that svn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1181.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved at 530359: I applied Dan's patch, but took the liberty
Thanks to some new SDO 2.1 feature implementation contributions from Frank
and some cleaning up of the CTS, Tuscany now runs cleanly against the
accepted tests in the CTS. I'm now starting to take a look at the under
review set. At this point I'm wondering whether notes on the list and JIRAs
are
Is this intentional on somebody's part or is it malicious in some way. I
can't see that it would be particularly malicious, but I imagine that
anyone subscribed to tucany-dev will now get JIRA notifications twice. Can
whoever has done this please explain why?
Thanks, Kelvin.
On 18/04/07,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489811
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-826:
Hi Brian, could you please change the headers in the static files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-826.
Resolution: Fixed
resolved at revision 530092 by committing Brian's patch whereby
: 6M/12M
[INFO]
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 April 2007 15:33
To: tuscany-dev
Subject: [Java SDO] Running the CTS against the Tuscany impl
I've been
I buried a notification on the list about the availability of release
candidate 3 for SDO for Java at the bottom of the vote thread on RC2. I
think perhaps it would have been clearer to start a new thread. So, please
poke and prod at it in advance of me starting a vote thread.
RC3 is at
.
Haleh
On 4/12/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haleh,
thanks for addressing these issues. One concern I have after a quick
look
is that on arriving at a pages such as
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/sdo-java.html some of the links on the
left
under a given heading go off
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1210.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
Added, tests, thanks Andy
.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 14:53
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Yes, I was about to write to the list on this subject. I'd like
a JUnit-specific inheritance dependency
and a JUnit-specific annotation dependency. Is the annotation
dependency less troublesome for some reason?
Simon
kelvin goodson wrote:
Thanks for this Andy, I'll play with it tomorrow.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 16/04/07, Andy Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1209.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx
Remove TestCase dependency
It builds cleanly for me, even after removing
~\.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\plugins\maven-dependency-plugin, so was
this an intermittent thing?
regards, Kelvin.
On 17/04/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just did an svn update of the SDO project, and now it fails to
You'd need to ascend the hierarchy with DataObject.getContainer() until you
reach the root (null return), and assemble the path string.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 17/04/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at the SDO Specification
and Javadocs trying to figure out how to
P.S. DataObject.getContainmentProperty() would give the path elements.
On 17/04/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at the SDO Specification
and Javadocs trying to figure out how to get a dataobject's
path (Relative to it's root).
Something like:
String path =
Yes, this looks fine for SDO. The parent artifact that we voted on recently
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/pom/parent/2/pom.xml
had already made this switch, and so my SDO M3 release candidates already
reference the parent in the incubating style. I'll make the
I took a look at the SDO side of this. The build still fails if you remove
the 0.8.0 version request. I was trying to look back to understand this
dependency, but it seems to have been done as part of TUSCANY-679 and its
not at all clear there the reasons for the change. Can anyone help me
currently working on submitting some more XSD test cases in the CTS
so I'll try this method out. Hopefully I can then remove the current
dependency on TestCase in those tests.
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of kelvin goodson
these links and
then changing the location/semantics of the info. I'll look into it
I ran into problems running the samples. I'll give it another try again
tomorrow.
OK, thanks or your efforts in helping this along
Kelvin.
Haleh
On 4/12/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant
this be
the
getInvolved link under development?
I ran into problems running the samples. I'll give it another try
again
tomorrow.
Haleh
On 4/12/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant,
here's a bit more context, since you asked about whether there had
been
discussion of this topic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1171:
Attachment: buildSDORelease.bat
Attaching this script I just made for building an SDO
they are ...
http://marc.info/?t=11760705873r=1w=2
**http://marc.info/?l=incubator-generalm=117606976901938w=2
Regards, Kelvin.
On 11/04/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to release the M3 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java
The release candidate RC2 for Tuscany Java SDO
401 - 500 of 1010 matches
Mail list logo
