to
just c++ das. For now this should be OK.
BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-)
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the
project, I don't know how I
to
just c++ das. For now this should be OK.
BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-)
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the
project, I don't know
I have just applied your patch. At some point, once we get things more
stable, we should decide witch way to go, and maybe promote the das_lite to
just c++ das. For now this should be OK.
BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-)
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3
scenario rather then a
new project.
I have couple questions :
- Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ?
- What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ?
- Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated
from cpp/das/runtime/core/src
/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion
we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then
a
new project.
I have couple questions :
- Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ?
- What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C
Hi All
I'd like to hear from C++ team and the comunity in general about the need
for a C++ implementation of DAS..
Could you guys elaborate about this ?
--
-
Luciano Resende
SOA Opensource - Apache Tuscany
