with the Java runtime side if others think this
would be useful.
...ant
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language
interop
tests. I've recently made some updates to the schema while testing with
PHP
SDO so I copied the updates
runtimes? I'd help with the Java runtime side if others think this
would be useful.
...ant
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language
interop
tests. I've recently made some updates to the schema while testing with
PHP
in either the C++ or
Java runtimes? I'd help with the Java runtime side if others think this
would be useful.
...ant
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language
interop
tests. I've recently made some updates
Ruby/Python/JavaScript composites which can be used in either the C++ or
Java runtimes? I'd help with the Java runtime side if others think this
would be useful.
...ant
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language
in either the
C++
or
Java runtimes? I'd help with the Java runtime side if others think
this
would be useful.
...ant
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross
language
interop
tests. I've recently
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language interop
tests. I've recently made some updates to the schema while testing with PHP
SDO so I copied the updates back to Tuscany/Interop. There is a patch
attached to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-730. There is also
On 9/18/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking with Andy offline about re-running the cross language
interop
tests. I've recently made some updates to the schema while testing with
PHP
SDO so I copied the updates back to Tuscany/Interop. There is a patch
attached to http
I'm confused about this proposal. Didn't you say earlier that the php
tests would be added to the PECL repository? In which case the logical
place would be pecl/sdo/tests/interop/. But (I'm guessing) your
tuscanyphp directory is in the Apache repository. And why is it
tuscanyphp/ and not
Mmmm. My fault. I mean that to be pecl/php... not tuscanyphp.
On 6/20/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused about this proposal. Didn't you say earlier that the php
tests would be added to the PECL repository? In which case the logical
place would be
In the Java project we already have some interop tests in
tuscany/java/testing/interop/ so for these SDO ones how about
tuscany/java/testing/interop/sdo?
How about a mix for options (2) and (3) - I can understand duplicating the
resources across Apache and PECL, but at least within Apache
Ok, Ant, that sounds like a good compromise. So we have two copies of the
common resources
1/ tuscany/interop/resources
2/ tuscanyphp/sdo-1.0.1/tests/interop
The test programs themselves live in test directories under the appropriate
projects.
I'm just refactoring the XSD/XML files a little so
+1 from me on Ant's suggestion.
Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/19/2006 10:59:05 AM:
Ok, Ant, that sounds like a good compromise. So we have two copies of
the
common resources
1/ tuscany/interop/resources
2/ tuscanyphp/sdo-1.0.1/tests/interop
The test programs themselves live
On 5/30/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
On 26/05/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A long time ago I posted about doing some interoperability testing. I've
got
back to this now and I've put some ideas about how we do this on the
wiki,
here
Simon,
On 26/05/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A long time ago I posted about doing some interoperability testing. I've
got
back to this now and I've put some ideas about how we do this on the wiki,
here (http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Interop).
...
So if we lay these tests out
A long time ago I posted about doing some interoperability testing. I've got
back to this now and I've put some ideas about how we do this on the wiki,
here (http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Interop).
At a high level we have two products to consider for interoperability
testing, SDO and SCA.
With regard to the interop scenario concerning moving data graphs from
location to location, I am a bit concerned that we are not covering the
other option. With the coming of AJAX, some people are looking more at
leaving the data where it is, and using the API to modify it on the server.
How
Hi Kevin
When you suggest and example of reading data from a data source and
shipping it to some remote engine for processing would this include, for
example, an application that reads a data graph from a relational database
and then forwards is in the form of and XML document to, say, an XFoms
So are you thinking about a specific services interface for an SDO object,
i.e. the SDO acts as a conduit between the data resource and the client
(browser)? In this scenario what happens when data is changed. Does the SDO
cache the change awaiting the request to update the data resource or does
I was actually thinking that the remote engine would deserialize the
graph and make changes using the SDO APIs. The graph (and change
history) would be re-serialized and shipped back to the originating DAS.
Thanks,
--Kevin
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Kevin
When you suggest and example of reading
.
On 5/2/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spent a little time getting familiar with PHP/SDO and had some more
thoughts about cross language interop testing. For SDO the most basic test
is to read and write an XML file from PHP/JAVA/C++ and compare the
results.
We could develop
kelvin goodson wrote:
[snip]
With regards to sharing change histories, I imagine the primary use case
for change histories is when you give a give a modified graph back to the
same DAS for writing back to the original source. So I in terms of
cross
language interoperability I would
Has anyone in the team done any work in Tuscany looking at cross language
interoperability? I'm initially interested in ensuring SDO serialization is
compatible between PHP, C++ and Java. If there is existing work it gives me
somewhere to start. If not I'll start something.
Simon
I don't think anyone has looked at this yet. It would be very good to
know if this works so please start something - if you have any
questions please ping this list.
--
Jeremy
On 4/25/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone in the team done any work in Tuscany looking at cross
23 matches
Mail list logo
