phone: 919-943-2578
home phone: 919-493-3570
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-03-22 09:01 AM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
Thank
below, are code that IBM has contributed to both Eclipse EMF
and Apache Tuscany.
Thanks,
Frank.
[snip]
Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-03-22 09:01 AM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release
Thank goodness, common sense applies :-)
Now we can proceed with the release candidate.
Thanks,
Frank.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/21/2007 05:27:35 PM:
On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I've confirmed that IBM, the
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
Apache
to reuse the two EMF files in question.
Thanks for confirming this.
I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes,
provided in
an attachment.
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
something official from IBM (Software Grant).
By attaching the two files to the JIRA, and selecting the Grant
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
something official from IBM (Software Grant).
By attaching
,
Frank.
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/21/2007 01:56 PM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably
to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done
@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP
On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
Apache
to reuse the two EMF files in question.
Thanks for confirming this.
I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the
Frank,
Standard disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and I am not qualified to give
legal interpretations. However, I have heard many lawyers give talks
on copyright :-) Based on this, I'd expect that the new method would
need to follow standard legal guidelines for defence against a claim
of
I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to Apache
to reuse the two EMF files in question.
I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes, provided in
an attachment.
Jeremy, let me know if this is good enough for you, or if you still want
me to remove the
On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Hmm, this seems like an example of where legal red tape may be
getting
in the way of the spirit of reuse.
One man's spirit of reuse is another's copyright infringement. This
is not something to take lightly.
EPL is very specific:
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/19/2007 06:14:58 PM:
On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Hmm, this seems like an example of where legal red tape may be
getting
in the way of the spirit of reuse.
One man's spirit of reuse is another's copyright
15 matches
Mail list logo
