[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-681?page=all ]
Pete Robbins updated TUSCANY-681:
-
Component/s: (was: C++ SDO)
Removing from component C++SDO as that part is done
Port of Tuscany C++ to Mac OS X, powerpc arch
On 12/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I agree this would be really useful. I'm a JIRA admin so I think I
should be
able to set it up, I can find various things related to it in the admin
panels, but unfortunately I can't
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-447?page=comments#action_12456324
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-447:
Looking back at this I realize that there isn't enough detail here.
This was the result of running the interop test
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-969?page=all ]
Venkatakrishnan updated TUSCANY-969:
Attachment: Tuscany-JIRA-969-Dec07-06.diff
HI Raymond,
Could you please take a quick look at this and let me know if I can go ahead
and commit it.
Hi Raymond,
I have attached a patch for this in the JIRA
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-969 as a first increment. Let
me know if its ok to commit and I will go ahead and do it. This is the
first increment and will add more as I get clarity on the following: -
- why is the
On 11/20/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked in the initial structure of a REST extension under
cpp/sca/runtime/extensions/rest, revision r477110.
The idea is to add support for interface.rest and binding.rest on
services and references and implement a RESTFul pattern
Hi guys,
The Axis2C chaps have marked this as 'Fix 1.0.0', I'm not
sure what it means, exactly, but I guess they are hoping to
include it for Axis2C 1.0. I was going to test this asap, but
my hard disk exploded and the machine is gone off to data
recovery hospital. If anyone else can give this
On 07/12/06, Hurley, Oisin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
The Axis2C chaps have marked this as 'Fix 1.0.0', I'm not
sure what it means, exactly, but I guess they are hoping to
include it for Axis2C 1.0. I was going to test this asap, but
my hard disk exploded and the machine is gone off to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-101?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-101.
Resolution: Later
Performance analysis and improvements
-
Key: TUSCANY-101
URL:
Thank you Brent. I will work on all the below suggestions.
Some more questions:-
For each different database type, different connection properties may
be mandatory.
So, to support this in rdb-das J2SE connection support, if we know the
vendor, we can have programmatic control over which apis to
The spec files (source, binary, and javadoc) are still missing from
this list. They need to be added to both the downloadable and maven
artifacts.
The following binary jars have already been published to maven and
need to be formally included in this vote.
Brent and Amita,
If we make these updates and connectionInfo becomes XML elements rather
then XML Attributes, would this break backward compatibility and make all
applications to have to update all DAS XML Config, is this right ? If this
is the case, is this acceptable ?
--
Luciano Resende
DataObject assigned into open property goes missing
---
Key: TUSCANY-980
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-980
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ SDO
On 05/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which other SDO defects are holfing folk up?
I just created http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-980. This is
closely related to many of the issues discussed on this thread, but I don't
think it's a dup.
On 07/12/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which other SDO defects are holfing folk up?
I just created http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-980. This is
closely related to many of the issues discussed on this thread,
No problem - we can just include these artifacts in this vote.
--
Jeremy
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:23 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
I think that must have happenned in error. I guess I must hve run
maven
deploy one directory too high at some time during the sdo release
process.
Apologies, Kelvin.
This has a dependency on the following artifacts that were uploaded
with SDO but were not actually part of that vote:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/osoa/sca-
api-r0.95/1.0-incubator-M2/sca-api-r0.95-1.0-incubator-M2.jar
IMO, at this early stage, we should continue to improve and simplify all
user APIs even when this requires breaking changes.
How do others feel about this?
Thanks.
--
Kevin
Luciano Resende wrote:
Brent and Amita,
If we make these updates and connectionInfo becomes XML elements rather
then
On 12/7/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you use
In the Java implementation we do the following:
1. If a sequenced type is created programatically, we map all the
properties to XML elements - so any property can be added to the sequence.
2. If a sequenced XSD-based type, then only properties that map to
elements can be added to the sequence.
I agree.. With only milestone builds out this shouldn't be a big
issue. In this particular case, the impact should be limited as it
will only affect those who were using the DAS in a J2EE environment.
Brent
On 12/7/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, at this early stage, we should
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Java implementation we do the following:
1. If a sequenced type is created programatically, we map all the
properties to XML elements - so any property can be added to the sequence.
That sounds right.
2. If a sequenced XSD-based
Hi Adriano,
Thanks for reporting this. I'm surprised it's not throwing an
exception -- I'll look into it.
Brent
On 12/6/06, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was executing a query using a stored procedure that was defined in a .xml
file. The procedure was a simple select: Command
On 07/12/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Frank. When a data object has an XSD based type is there
are way of getting all of it's properties which the XSD says are
attributes.
This is where it gets a bit ugly. It's ok if you know what the attribute
names are as you
Hi, Venkat.
The patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Venkatakrishnan (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:39 AM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-969) Add pass-by-value support for
remotable
Yes David, this seems to be working for me as well...
Jeremy and/or others, Is it ok to submit this workaround fix ?
On 12/6/06, David Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding version element to several pom files fixed the build problem for
me.
Since I'm new to Maven, this workaround may not be
Does anyone have a proper solution to this? I've been playing with
dependencyManagement elements in various places the parent pom hierarchy,
but nothing other than an explicit version in the dependency section seems
to change the version that's being requested. Also a mvn help:efective-pom
on a
Hi Raymond,
Thanks. Will take a look at your comments and get some understanding.
Meanwhile I have gone ahead with '@AllowsPassByReference'. I have been able
to get this working for the interface level. I created an
AllowPassByReference implementation processor and am able to deal with this.
Hi Venkat,
Comments inline.
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Raymond,
Thanks. Will take a look at your comments and get some understanding.
Meanwhile I have gone ahead with '@AllowsPassByReference'. I have
been able
to get this working for the interface level. I
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 12/5/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 11/20/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Hi,
I
Can you confirm that for a sequenced DataObject if I set a property
using
e.g. setString(prop, text) then that setting will added to the
sequence
as if getSequence().add(prop, text) was used?
Right (but only if the property maps to an XML element).
Pete is right about how it works and that it is kind of ugly. We have an
internal way of doing it more easily, but the only way an SDO client can
do it is the way Pete said. Maybe we need to open an SDO 3 spec issue for
adding a convenient way to access non-sequenced properties of a
sequenced
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-976?page=comments#action_12456542
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-976:
I have checked in a fix with r483607. Can you verify and let me know to mark
this issue as resolved?
Doing a google code search, looke like the felix trunk poms are all using
0.9.0 version..
I'm wondering if we are using any felix artifact that is referencing a
0.9.0version, cause it does not seems that we are referencing it
directly
also, I'm not sure what's the best way to track this kind
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-563?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-563:
---
Attachment: sdotest.563
Thanks to Geoff for applying.
The Test Case is also attached.
Tests on Windows XP SP2 before the patch:
Test Failed: 115
Try mvn -X which gives you a lot of information.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone else seing build broken : unable to unable to
Well, a broken build is useless to everyone, so while we try to find the
proper solution I'm going to deliver the solution proposed by David.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 12/7/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing a google code search, looke like the
This sounds quite good.
I have written some test cases with Brian Murray which I would be happy to
contribute to tuscany. Identifying duplication and differences in similar
tests would probably be an intersting excercise right off the bat.
One decision that we spent a little time mulling over
On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Well, a broken build is useless to everyone, so while we try to
find the
proper solution I'm going to deliver the solution proposed by David.
This offending artifact was the maven plugin to generate OSGi bundle
manifests for the OSGi
Great, I have commited changes to use 0.8.0 version and it's working now.
On 12/7/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Well, a broken build is useless to everyone, so while we try to
find the
proper solution I'm going to deliver the
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you confirm that for a sequenced DataObject if I set a property
using
e.g. setString(prop, text) then that setting will added to the
sequence
as if getSequence().add(prop, text) was used?
Right (but only if the property maps to an
Although unrelated to the now-fixed build problem, quotes may be missing
from the felix sections of pom files.
c:\tuscany\java\spec\sdo-api\pom.xml
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.felix.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-osgi-plugin/artifactId
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete is right about how it works and that it is kind of ugly. We have an
internal way of doing it more easily, but the only way an SDO client can
do it is the way Pete said. Maybe we need to open an SDO 3 spec issue for
adding a convenient
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-97?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-97:
--
Attachment: sdotest.97
Thanks to Geoff for applying.
The Test Case is also attached.
Tests on Windows XP SP2 before the patch:
Test Failed: 115
Robbie,
I'd like to learn more about your general test libraries. Can you provide
examples of using your libraries with JUnit and/or source/javadoc?Also,
with JUnit, would the calls to your libraries be isolated to JUnit fixtures,
*e.g., @Before and @After methods?
Thank you.
David
*
Schema Definitions need to be unregistered from Registry
Key: TUSCANY-983
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-983
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Sub-task
Yes, I'm interested ; )...I will see how to create a Jira and any doubt (I
think there will be many) I will post it here, ok?!
Adriano Crestani
On 12/7/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Adriano
I had an offline chat with Brent, and we agreedn that this looks like a
simple
On 12/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 12/5/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 11/20/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-931?page=comments#action_12456629
]
Yang ZHONG commented on TUSCANY-931:
FeatureMap validation bug has been fixed and may be integrated into EMF 2.2.2:
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 7:35 AM
Subject: Update: [VOTE] Release incubator-M2 version of SCA for Java
This has a dependency on the following artifacts that
On 12/7/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked in the initial structure of a REST extension under
cpp/sca/runtime/extensions/rest, revision r477110.
The idea is to add support for interface.rest and binding.rest on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-153?page=comments#action_12456651
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-153:
Serialization of ChangeSummary on DataObjects is not implemented yet, but the
rest has been committed in
+1
Jim
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
This has a dependency on the following artifacts that were uploaded
with SDO but were not actually part of that vote:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/osoa/sca-
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
We may want to ask the OSOA spec workgroup whether the WS binding is
actually mandatory to support as part of core SCA programming model or
not. The SCA assembly spec currently states that it is mandatory, but
now that the WS binding has its own separate
Well here is what I picked up from the specs and CI model
The @AllowsPassByReference annotation on the implementation of a
remotable
service is used to either declare that calls to the whole interface or
individual methods allow pass by reference. and Either a whole
class
implementing a
55 matches
Mail list logo
