Hi all,
This is Ignacio Silva-Lepe. I am interested in contributing to Tuscany, in
particular wrt support for async programming. I have taken a look at the first
implementation of async non-blocking and I would also like to see it moved to
the sca/core. I am also interested in helping, I could
Not sure whether references with multiplicity *..n are available yet. If
they're not I can wait. But in case they are, I am getting the following
exception:
Exception in thread main
org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.BuilderConfigException: Incompatible source and
target interface types for
: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core
Environment: Eclipse 3.1.1 on Windows XP SP2
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Priority: Minor
Exception in thread main
org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.BuilderConfigException: Incompatible source and
target interface types for reference
Supply chain sample
---
Key: TUSCANY-246
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-246
Project: Tuscany
Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Core
Environment: Eclipse 3.1.1 on Windows XP SP2
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Here is the zip
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-246?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-246:
---
Attachment: supplychainsample.zip
Supply chain sample
---
Key: TUSCANY-246
URL: http://issues.apache.org
Hi Jim,
Yes, I would be interested in working on conversational support, thanks for
asking. We can sync up after JavaOne to coordinate. By then I hope I have a
better understanding of the implementation details of scope containers, etc.
Ignacio
- Original Message -
Hi Ignacio,
I'm
Yes, I can make it to the chat, talk to you then. I'm not planning to be at
JavaOne, I'm afraid.
- Original Message -
Cool. I have some work on a BigBank async sample done as part of the
specification collaboration that I need to clear but once I do, we can
discuss that as part of
And while we're at it, the other times are really 8am PDT and 11am EDT, as
the US is also in Daylight Saving time ;-)
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: IRC chat today May 5th, was: IRC
Are we supposed to still be able to invoke
bigbank.account.client.AccountClient, say from eclipse? I get a
ConfigurationLoadException on sca.module, for which there is not a resources
directory any more.
Also, trying to run bigbank.account.services.accountdb.AccountDBInit throws
again.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Build Break?
Hi Raymond,
Any luck with this? I am having the exact same problem, deleted the entire
eclipse dir from
I am trying to run the big bank account sample's web client. I downloaded
apache-tomcat-5.5.17.zip onto testing/tomcat and ran mvn to start tomcat, which
gives me the NPE below. Any ideas as to what I may be doing wrong? Thanks,
Ignacio.
INFO: Loading SCA configuration for application
Well, after updating from svn (via eclipse), I did an mvn clean from the top
and then mvn -e (also from the top). I then did a separate mvn -e from
sca/samples. After that, I did a subsequent mvn clean from testing/tomcat
and then mvn to start tomcat.
I still get the NPE to start tomcat and
Excuse my ignorance, but I am trying to figure out how the sdo-source for
bigbank/account gets generated. I am assuming (of course, I could be wrong)
that there should be a specification file somewhere in the sample. So far, I
can only find DasAccountConfiguration.xml in
Ok, never mind. If I'm not mistaken, the schema in AccountService.wsdl is
also used for this purpose, sorry for the self-answered question ...
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=comments#action_12383405
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-270:
I am attaching a diff file with sample code. A logger service is used by the
account service to async'y log
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-270:
---
Attachment: async-bigbank-new.txt
I just realized that I missed one file in the previous attachment
(accountLog.jsp in webclient/src/main
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-270?page=comments#action_12412968
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-270:
In stock sell, it turns out that the DAS select command issued by the data
service was not including symbol
I'd like to start working on providing support for callbacks, assuming the
sandbox is a good place to do this. Currently, I am focusing on local,
stateless callbacks to begin with. Later, and assuming that conversational
support is in place (which I am also keen on contributing to) I can work
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I'd like to start working on providing support for callbacks
Jim,
Perhaps we could discuss this via a more immediate medium. How about IRC or
phone? I am online today until 5pm EDT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apologies Jeremy, didn't mean to exclude people, just trying
to expedite the discussion.
The first basic issue I see is how to incorporate callbacks as
defined in the CI spec in particular, and bi-directional interfaces
in general, into the Tuscany architecture. Depending on how closely a
Hi Jim,
Sorry about the disconnect, I was out Monday and yesterday. I'll be sure to
attend the IRC chat tomorrow. In the meantime, some more quick comments.
- Original Message -
snip/
If I understand correctly, would a system service transport use a
low level
communication
I too think that having a work manager implementation that minimizes
dependencies (e.g., Geronimo's)
is a useful thing to have. Wrt using a work manager in the support for
callbacks, we should
just make sure that we are ok with the overall architecture first. At his
point, it looks like the
Hi Jim,
An inline comment on your first point.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
Hi guys,
I won't be able to make IRC today but please feel free to go ahead
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Oisin Hurley wrote:
Yes I was counting on the binding (e.g. Celtix, Axis) to provide RM
I am trying to get the supply chain sample to work on chianti to have a test
case for the one-way rework based on the callback discussion. I copied the
supplychain dir from the main trunk and changed pom.xml, the stand-alone client
and the test case, and I moved sca.module to default.scdl under
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Upgrading supply chain sample to work with new version of spec under chianti
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one
, at 11:45 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
To allow JavaAtomicComponent to create a new AsyncJavaTargetInvoker, it
needs to supply the new target invoker with a work manager. My first try
(which may not be the appropriate thing to do) was to get a work manager
autowired into JavaComponentBuilder
- GeronimoWorkManager. The gist is for the work scheduler to abstract
the work management implementation mechanism.
hth
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 July 2006 16:37
To: Tuscany Dev
Subject: Re: WorkManager in JavaComponentBuilder
I'm
I have an initial pass at a replacement for one-way
async support using a target invoker rather than an interceptor. I have been
able to test it in chianti and ported it to the latest trunk. For some reason
having to do with SCA SPI test failures, I can't successfully build the man
trunk
I was seeing a similar error as Rick, I updated and picked up the fix and
now I see the following error, after which the build hangs (suspecting a
deadlock now):
[surefire] Running
org.apache.tuscany.core.services.work.jsr237.Jsr237WorkSchedu
lerTestCase
[surefire] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0,
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor
to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I
added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's
createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to
an implementation processor
Hi Ignacio,
Can you create a JIRA and attach the code so I can take a look?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a
CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-585:
---
Attachment: CallbackPatch.txt
Patch with code and sample attached
Initial support for callbacks
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-585:
---
Attachment: CallbackPatch.txt
Including JavaMappedCallback and IllegalCallbackException that had not been
added to version control, apologies
the patch is missing the following classes:
JavaMappedCallback and IllegalCallbackException
Can you just attach the classes to the JIRA issue (no need to patch)?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-585?page=all
.
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, done. Forgot to add them to version control, apologies.
- Original Message - From: Jim Marino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585
:47 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
I'll apply it. Sorry I disappeared this week but I had a personal thing
that came up...In the meantime, have a good vacation and ping when you
are back.
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote
Do you have time to chat some time today or tomorrow about where we are on
wiring, callbacks via references (local and remote), and conversational
support? I'm available for the next 1.5 hrs today and all day tomorrow
(except for a 1-2pm EDT mandatory meeting).
- Original Message -
Hi Jim,
When you have some time to chat, I have a few questions about references.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Initial support for callbacks
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Sure, I want to make sure I understand what local callbacks (or plain
invocations for that matter) via references means.
I was defining a local callback as being a bidirectional wire to a target
down to the
appropriate CompositeReference (selected by name).
--
Jeremy
On Aug 11, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, ok, first off a bit of clarification on the terminology. When I say
local callback (or plain invocation) via a reference, I was thinking
about the case
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-585) Initial support for callbacks
On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I have a feeling there may be
One of the composite reference scenarios outlined by Jeremy has a local wire
between the Component and the Reference, and an external wire from the
CompositeComponent to a sibling Component or Reference (aka the uncle). For
instance:
composite xmlns=http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0;
Raymond, thanks for the corrections, I was not using the latest spec and I
made up the nesting. I append my original note with the correct scdl to
restart the thread. As for your questions, (1) yes, the intention is that
InnerComposite be executed in the same address space as OuterComposite,
can rename it if/when we find something
better. Of course, all this is up for debate, so let me know.
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Composite references - wiring
17, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Composite references - wiring and model and runtime
representations
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
One more thing. AIUI, the assembly spec defines a service/ element as
containing a required reference URI. This means that getTarget
: New Feature
Components: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-Mx
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Support is added to represent composite references and services (those in a
composite and without a binding
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: CompositeRefsAndSvcs.txt
Here's the patch with the code to support composite reference and services.
Composite references
Hi Raymond, Jim,
Comments in line.
Ignacio
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Service, Reference and Binding models
On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think
I am trying to run a more complete sample version of the inner composite test
case and I am getting the following exception:
Running innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.482 sec FA
ILURE!
will have to define a component in the
META-INF/tuscany/composite.scdl for test, launcher and webapp-host
modules (unfortunately we don't have a good packaging story for the system
SCDLs).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tuscany Dev
implementation.composite
Did you make sure that you added it to all of the three projects
(launcher, test and webapp-host)?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: Can't load
)
at org.apache.tuscany.test.SCATestCase.setUp(SCATestCase.java:65)
at
innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase.setUp(InnerCompositeTestCase.ja
va:30)
Trying to track it down, but just in case it rings a bell.
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED
get the NPE. Of course, this was just a guess. Any ideas?
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Can't load implementation.composite
Actually, my mistake, I am now getting
uses name=InnerComposite, I tried putting the inner composite
scdl in InnerComposite.scdl in the same dir as default.scdl
(META-INF/sca) but I still get the NPE. Of course, this was just a guess.
Any ideas?
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany
,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Can't load implementation.composite
Ok. I hacked CompositeComponentTypeLoader to do:
if (scdlLocation == null
I posted a new patch for this but have not received the corresponding email.
In case others are on the same boat, I append the text of the post.
Here's a new patch that modifies CompositeBuilderTestCase to verify that the
Connector also works for composite services and references.
This patch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerComposite.patch
Here's a new patch that modifies CompositeBuilderTestCase to verify that the
Connector also works
FWIW, I also get this error, along with:
[surefire] Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.JAXBTestCase
[surefire] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.541 sec
[surefire]
[surefire] testTransform(org.apache.tuscany.databinding.JAXBTestCase) Time
elap
sed: 0.511 sec ERROR!
The latest update, that updates a lot of the core/implementation/processors,
seems to be breaking a lot if not all of the sca samples. The way I see this is
by doing a mvn clean and mvn -e from the top, which breaks while running the
tests for the SDO impl, so then I go to sca/core and do mvn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: New build break
On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, first, after mvn clean from the top and trying mvn -e from the top,
I get:
Then I do mvn -e from sca/core and from
Ok, yes, the recipe is getting more intricate every time, but I got the
samples to run now. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: New build break
I'm going to send out a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerCompositeCallback.patch
This newer patch subsumes InnerComposite.patch (assuming that the latter has
not been applied
(name, e);
} finally {
thread.setContextClassLoader(oldCL);
}
}
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Can't load implementation.composite
Ok, will try
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-673?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-673:
---
Attachment: ImplementationCompositeLoader.patch
support scdlLocation attribute on implementation.composite
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-673?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-673:
---
Attachment: ImplementationCompositeLoaderAndTest.patch
support scdlLocation attribute on implementation.composite
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: InnerCompositeCallback2.patch
This patch subsumes InnerCompositeCallback.patch. It incorporates local
invocations and callbacks
Hi Jim,
Would you please let me know when you are done applying the inner composite
patch? Don't mean to rush you, but I'd rather wait until that is done before
I do another update, I imagine my current local sandbox would get pretty
messy if I update now ... ;-)
I am getting a good picture
.
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Inner composite patch, was Re: Optiional Autowire
On 8/31/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I am getting a good picture of what needs
/trunk/java/modules/nhttp/
...ant
On 8/31/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, np.
The basic idea is to use (1) the wiring and connection infrastructure
that
is there (or shortly to be there once the patch is applied) for composite
references and services, and (2) the non
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-Mx
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Attachments: RevisedCallbackChainsCorrelationAndRouting.patch
A revised
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-706?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-706:
---
Attachment: RevisedCallbackChainsCorrelationAndRouting.patch
At issue creation time, it is possible to attach a file but there does not seem
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: RevisedInnerCompositeCallback.patch
This patch replaces InnerCompositeCallback2.patch. It integrates its contents
with the latest
timestamp-based ids is only an initial try at it.
.. . . .. . . .
. . . .
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (914) 784 7003 Fax: (914) 784 6807
Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2006 02:48 AM
To
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
After getting a newer copy of axiom-api-SNAPSHOT.jar in my repo, to get rid of
a previous class not found error involving java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/axiom/om/util/StAXUtils, now I get the error below. Any help is
appreciated, as I am trying to get the Axis2 binding to build with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: CommentsOut.patch
Trivial change to remove some commented out code
Composite references and services - model and runtime
I noticed that the first statement in Axis2ServiceTestCase is 'if (true)
return;'. Any pointers into what the problem was that prompted bypassing the
test?
Axis Binding
Affects Versions: Java-M2
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Assigned To: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-M2
Support for callbacks over Axis2 binding is added.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-721?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-721:
---
Attachment: Axis2Callbacks.patch
This patch contains the main code and preliminary test cases added to the
existing ones. More testing
operation could be
used, provided it can be gracefully extracted.
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-721) Adding support for callbacks over
.
...ant
On 9/13/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-721?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-721:
---
Attachment: Axis2Callbacks.patch
This patch contains the main code
Just to touch base on this. I had a conversation with Jim and we agreed that
composite references, in particular those with a binding such as
Axis2Reference, will also be given an outbound wire so that they can use it
to add a DataBindingInterceptor.
In addition, instead of using an outbound
.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tuscany Dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Testing async ws
Hi Raymond,
I'd like to proceed with testing async ws (including ws/Axis2 callbacks).
Two
Comment inline.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better
-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in JMS
across providers, not to mention programming languages
Hmmm, this is interesting. I get a very similar exception trying to run the
helloworlswsclient sample (after renaming the test case so that it can be
run):
---
T E S T S
---
Running
So, the basic idea was that AccountDataServiceDASImpl should implement both
AccountDataService and CustomerIdService, but @Service was not able to
handle a list of more than one interface. Also notice that CustomerIdService
includes most of what is in AccountDataService instead of extending it,
default.scdl to app.scdl.
...ant
On 9/28/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to run HelloWorldWSClientTestCase in the helloworldwsclient
sample. For some reason, when I print the application scdl URL, obtained
by
URL applicationScdlURL = cl.getResource(applicationSCDL
.
Thanks again.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 3:39 AM
Subject: [RESULT] Re: Ignacio Silva-Lepe for Tuscany Committer
Result of the vote for Ignacio:
12 +1s (Andrew Borley, Pete Robbins, Raymond Feng
Raymond,
Ok, I thought I understood this. In particular, an Axis2Reference's inbound
wire would be able to see an 'interface.contract', which I take to mean a
contract derived from the interface between the reference and, say, a
component wired to it, e.g., an interface.java.
However, for
Raymond,
It seems to me something go lost in the translation of Axis2ReferenceCallback
from before to after the databinding framework, or at a minimum it did not get
translated correctly.
As originally written, Axis2ReferenceCallback is the object that is given to
the Axis2 operation client
use the interface.wsdl without the callback and that's
probably why see WSDLServiceContract.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: How can we insert
I am trying to run the hellowordwsclient sample by changing the bound reference
to use an interface.java, with which it runs ok. But if I then add a
callbackInterface I get the error below.
By using a callbackInterface, an Axis2AsyncTargetInvoker is chosen that calls
Axis2's
: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
I am trying to run the hellowordwsclient sample by changing the bound reference
to use an interface.java, with which it runs ok. But if I then add a
callbackInterface I get the error below.
By using a callbackInterface, an Axis2AsyncTargetInvoker
Ok, I'll take a look.
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:25 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in CompositeReference.java when
service is defined using interface wsdl
=commonj.sdo.DataObject)
public String getGreetings1(DataObject name);
public void getGreetingsWithCallback(String name);
}
It seems that getGreetings(...) goes to the async path in my debugging.
Please help me understand here.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-Mx
Reporter: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Fix For: Java-Mx
Trying the plain inner.composite sample without a fix for TUSCANY-767, gives
the failure below. It seems like the SynchronousBridgingInterceptor may be
having a problem. Having tried
Ok, I took a look. Fixing CompositeReference to not be interface/method
centric is not a big deal. However CompositeReferenceTargetInvoker and
CompositeReferenceCallbackTargetInvoker are defined in terms of
PojoTargetInvoker which itself is interface/method centric. Given the
current
be useful to try to go back to the spec collaboration to try
to calrify the intent.
Thoughts?
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: NoClassDefFoundError, apparently in Axis2
Yeah
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
