Re: SVN build process.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giorgio Zoppi wrote: > >> i've a proposal for current svn. We could make most of our effort to >> make the svn compile. >> I suggest to trying a fresh build before committing meaniful things >> and after committing. >> It's m

XQuery sample JAXB issue

I'm down to my last problem with the 2347 patch I'm trying to apply and it's a real good one. If feels awfully familiar. But I can't for the life of me work out how a patch which makes changes to do with validation errors can cause the attached exception in the XQuery sample. I'm on IBM JDK 5 and,

Re: XQuery sample JAXB issue

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am seeing this too, but when i run from my eclipse IDE the test seems to > be passing. > > On 6/13/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I get this too, and can't figure it out either. Doesn't seem at all > > int

Re: Release 1.3?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 to cut 1.3 branch. > > > > Raymond > > > > ------ > > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM > > To: ; <[EMAIL

Re: Changing SCA trunk version from 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to SNAPSHOT

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > >> > > >> How about 1.

Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let me know if there ar

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > >> I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain >> modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done >> with &

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full > clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-). > > Thanks, > Raymond > --

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm done with the JSR 250 issues, and got a clean build from latest > svn revision. > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13,

Working on the release 1.3 branch

Hi I've changed the version number and got rid of the DISCLAIMER files. I'm looking at the getting the distribution build working, checking LICENSE/NOTICE and dependency versions before cutting an RC0 for us to look at. If people want to help out with this pre-RC0 release prep then feel free and j

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> I'm done with the JSR 250 issues, and got a clean build from

Re: Working on the release 1.3 branch

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I've changed the version number and got rid of the DISCLAIMER files. I'm > >

Re: [Summary] Monitor Extension Functionality & How to create a new monitor extension

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the brief summary on the monitor extensions, please review the same > and post your comments and suggestions on the same. This would help us for > the documentation. > ** > *Need for Monitor Extension:* > **The need

Maven can't find org.jvnet:mimepull:jar:1.1

I've started getting... 1) org.jvnet:mimepull:jar:1.1 Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.jvnet -DartifactId=mimepull \ -Dversion=1.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file Altern

Re: Maven can't find org.jvnet:mimepull:jar:1.1

On Jan 21, 2008 1:58 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This respository is already in the databinding-jaxb pom.xml. I did > encounter this once today, but was gone the next build :) > > - Venkat > > On Jan 21, 2008 4:32 PM, Simon Laws <[EM

Re: SCA runtimes

> > I think we need to keep in mind the bigger overall picture when thinking > about these details, if we've been getting too much into the > implementation > detail would help to step back a bit - the following are the things i > think > we're trying to do here: > > 1) applications to contain only

Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object

On Jan 21, 2008 6:55 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute > as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object. > This request is based on a requirement to provide support to implement a > late-endpoi

Re: JMS services and threading

snip... > > 1) have the consumer spawn new threads to process each request (using the > existing Tuscany thread pool). One problem with that is i don't think we > can't do QOS using the standard JMS APIs as once the consumer returns the > message is considered successfully processed but the spawne

helloworld JMS sample

I created a helloworld-reference/service pair for JMS last week when I was looking into some JMS questions on the list. They use the same scenario as the binding.jms unit tests but seems a shame to throw them away so I checked them into samples. The service unit test is currently turned off as it h

Re: JMS services and threading

On Jan 23, 2008 12:22 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 2:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > snip... > > > > > > > > 1) have the consumer spawn new threads to process each request (using > > the > &g

Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework

Hi Scott snip... > A key piece of the puzzle would be the ability to query what's "on the > other side of the binding".For example, I might have a binding > impl with a co-located (same-JVM) optimized path in which I don't want > to do a transform if the service impl uses the same DB as the c

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating (RC3)

On Jan 21, 2008 5:47 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > Here's my +1 > > > Yours, Mike. > > Simon Laws wrote: > > Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > Java. > > > > The SVN tag fo

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

Hi, The Tuscany project had a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev has 7 +1s and an archive can be found at: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html The release includes new function

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being > > distributed are OK. > > Surely the

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being > > distributed are OK. > > Surely the

Re: SCA runtimes

On Jan 24, 2008 5:58 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Updating this list with other suggestions gives (added points 6-9): > > > > 1) applications to contain only the code and other artifacts required > for > > the applic

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Hi sebb > > > > > > Thank you for the deta

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Sebastien/Ant > > > Here's a longer scenario, showing how I want to use contributions and > > composites in a domain for the store tutorial I've been working on. > A real eye opener. Thank you for this. snip... > > getting this to work on a single node first without the gui and individual > > d

Re: Tuscany 1.1 build failure

Hi snip.. > > > The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java. Try doing set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m before doing the build > > BTW, it looks like the M2 build downloads multiple versions of some jars, > e.g : Do you mean the M2 build - that's pretty old? > However, the second time I

[VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating (RC3a)

A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@ http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html The follow changes have been made to create RC3a - where possible remove the work files that are i

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

On Jan 25, 2008 12:50 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating (RC3a)

On Jan 27, 2008 8:17 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the > IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@ > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html > >

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

> > > Add the > > code that loads all contributions that are available from the file > system. > > Ant already has this code in various forms > > We can do simpler than load "all contributions that are available from > the file system" as the list of contributions to be loaded in a node is > determ

Re: Contents of Tuscany binary archives

On Jan 28, 2008 2:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems to me it would be useful to create a binary archive without any > of the external jars. > > This would considerably reduce the size of the archive. > > Most of the jars are likely to remain the same between releases anyway. > > -

Re: SVN eol-style:native settings

On Jan 28, 2008 1:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like the SVN eol-style:native properties have not been set up > for some of the xml files, for example: > > modules/binding-dwr/pom.xml > > This causes problems when working on the files using both Windows and > Unix. > > Also, a

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

Hi, The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some issues. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thread in para

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

snip... > I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a > distributed environment, I'd prefer to: > - define a model representing a contribution repository > - persist it in some XML form > I've started on some model code in my sandbox [1]. Feel free to use and abuse. R

Re: Contents of Tuscany binary archives

> > > Perhaps you could issue the external dependencies in a separate > archive; that would need the appropriate N &L of course, but would not > change very often. > Sounds attractive. So we would have tuscany-binaries tuscany-dependencies tuscany-src I think this would be an advantage if we go

Re: Contents of Tuscany binary archives

On Jan 29, 2008 9:11 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 9:04 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps you could issue the external dependencies in a separate > > > archive; that wo

Re: Contents of Tuscany binary archives

> > An alternative to what we do now with all the licenses embedded in the one > top level LICENSE file is to include the licenses in individual files > either > in a separate licenses folder or in the same folder as the dependency so > its > real easy to see if any are missing and what they apply

Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > snip... > > > I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a > > distributed environment, I'd prefer to: > > - define a model representing a contribution

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Jan 29, 2008 4:22 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Comments inline. Note that I have also some prototype of a install > program in my sandbox. > > On Jan 29, 2008 7:14 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon

Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a

On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. > > What about the files that are in SVN but missing from the source archive? > > > Hi Sebb Yes, there are still some files in the tag, from which the released artifacts (binary and source) are constructed that are not included in th

Re: Contents of Tuscany binary archives

snip... > > Spring provides another package with the binaries, samples and docs, > without dependencies [1], but I was not trying to cover samples when I > pointed to the Spring example and was not suggesting to only have two Neither was I. just pointing out that Spring takes a slightly differe

Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a

On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > OK. > > > > > > What about the files that are in SVN

Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a

On Jan 30, 2008 1:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

On Jan 30, 0008 1:13 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=43866&projectId=277 > > Build statistics: > State: Error > Previous State: Ok > Started at: Wed 30 Jan 2008 04:02:59 -0800 > Finished

Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a

On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Jan 30, 2008 12:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > [snip] > > The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the > > current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution > name > >

Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object

RI. (It's not legal to specify both.) If the value from > the reference target were set into the binding URI, would that give > you what you need? > > Simon > > > > > > > > On 1/30/08, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating (RC3a)

On Jan 31, 2008 10:25 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > ...ant > > On Jan 27, 2008 8:17 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the > > IPMC Tuscany Java SCA

Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object

snip... > > >>The value from the reference target is currently set to the target when > > the reference is matched to a target service. > > > I don't quite follow the above. Are you saying that the service URI > is copied into the reference binding URI at the matching stage? Is this > the fully

Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a

On Jan 30, 2008 2:08 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: question on runtime Java2WSDLHelper

Hi Lou A question relating to the phasing here. > > > Along these same lines, I am looking to emit, as a file, the WSDL > required > > for client development. This needs to be emitted prior to the start of > the > > service so obtaining it from ?wsdl is not feasible. > Is this something you wa

[RESULT][VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > ...ant > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Graduation next steps

On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for graduating > to an Apache TLP. > > The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since then > it > feels like we've just been waiting around hoping diver

Re: Problem building SCA Java from trunk

On Feb 1, 2008 12:27 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I think that there may be a problem with building the SCA code from trunk. > > I did an svn update on my system yesterday and then did mvn clean. > > This FAILED, complaining about not being able to find jars relating to

Re: question on runtime Java2WSDLHelper

snip.. On Jan 31, 2008 8:44 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Simon, This timing of this is more of a service side requirement than > a > client one. Due to some dependencies I have I need to have access to a > physical WSDL file at service provider startup. > > OK, I see. Where wou

Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object

Some more comments inline > > Lets see if I can articulate this a little better. My thinking is that > taget= represents a binding independent way to resolve an endpoint. It > doesnt necessarily specify the contents of the effective URI that is > used to address an endpoint. +1 > In the

Re: WSDLLess Deployment Implementation Question

On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the "wsdlless" > deployment > function. > The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the > life-cycle. > Namely, deployment, binding start, and service definition. It

Distribution structure

I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new distribution infrastructure at www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ We need to make a decision about how this will be structured. As a default I assume we stick pretty much with what we have already (see http://archive.apache.org/dist/inc

Tuscany Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating and new Incubator distribution policy

Hi The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to www.apache.org/dist/incubator. The proposal it to use a similar release structu

Re: Tuscany Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating and new Incubator distribution policy

On Feb 3, 2008 12:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release > > 1.1-incubating. Following up f

Re: Tuscany Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating and new Incubator distribution policy

Thanks for the speedy feedback. On Feb 3, 2008 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We know how we want our distribution directories structured (see start > of > > th

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1999) ConversationAttributes and expiry doesn't work with Stateless Conversational components

Issue Type: Bug > > Components: Java SCA Core Runtime > >Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1 > >Reporter: Ben Smith > >Assignee: Simon Laws > > Fix For: Java-SCA-Next > > > > Attachments: Conversation

Re: Tuscany Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating and new Incubator distribution policy

On Feb 3, 2008 7:04 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008 5:10 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2008 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2008

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany SCA Java 1.1 released

The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.1 release of the Java SCA project. Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are bein

Re: Tuscany 1.1 in maven repo

On Feb 8, 2008 4:27 PM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I can't seem to spot the 1.1 artifacts over at > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository > > Is this intentional - has the repo location changed? Or has it just > slipped through the net? > > Cheers, > >

Re: Tuscany 1.1 in maven repo

On Feb 8, 2008 4:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 8, 2008 4:27 PM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I can't seem to spot the 1.1 artifacts over at > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incuba

Re: JIRA backlog

On Feb 6, 2008 1:36 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've about 170 open JIRAs for SCA, (currently split over 3 versions but > i'll go move all the SCA ones to SCA-next), what shall we do about them? > > There's various suggestions for how to improve JIRA handling listed at: > > http://

Re: Performance results.

On Feb 10, 2008 12:50 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tried my app a while ago in a 16 node-cluster and I'm publishing > my result at > http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~zoppi/out/ch06.html > They are in italian but you can find man

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

Hi Venkat A question. snip... > > - In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite > files > so that all definitions.xml file contents can all be aggregated > Do you mean all the definitions.xml files in the contribution or all the definitions.xml files in the domain? Sim

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Venkat > > > > A question. > > > > snip... > > > > > > > > - In the contributi

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

snip.. On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various > SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be > applicable ever. > > So, in the code today, how do you know you have

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

gt; I think I might have to change this a bit in the context of multiple > contributions. Isn't it ? > > - Venkat > > On Feb 12, 2008 2:41 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > snip.. > > > > On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

snip... against the aggregated union of all definitions. Do you see something > missing ? The point I'm interested in is what happens to the composites that belong to contributions that have previously been added when you add a new contribution, for example, ContributionA definitions.xml(A)

Re: Adding 'applicablePolicySets' to PolicySetAttachPoints

snip... > in definitions.xml(A). But, is this sort of re-processing / rebuild is a > requirment only in this context ? If there are other contexts as well, > such > as re-wiring and we there is going to be a separate phase for this, then > I'd > like to do this as well in that phase. > > Absolu

Processing multiple WSDLs in the same namespace

re. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2043 Part of the the fix for this involves removing a FIXME in org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.wsdl.xml.XSDModelResolver. Specifically at the bottom of the aggregate method I need to comment out two lines... // FIXME: [rfeng] This is

What should be in Tuscany SCA Java release 1.2?

Hi It's probably about time we started talking about what's going to be in Tuscany SCA Java release 1.2. From the past timeline I would expect us to be trying for a release mid to late March which is not very far away. Some of the things I'd like to see are; More progress on our domain level com

Re: Processing multiple WSDLs in the same namespace

he effect of the disappearing XSD, i.e. I saw the result nest facade only having 1 object inside it and assumed, incorrectly, that is was another facade. > > > Thanks, > Raymond > > - Original Message - > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Processing multiple WSDLs in the same namespace

Raymond, A couple of comments below.. My preference would be to check in the changes I've made that make the itest (wsdl-multiple) that I've just checked in at least work. I can then close JIRA-2043 that relates to a very specific problem and raise a new one that discusses the general situation.

Re: [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

On Feb 15, 0008 4:09 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51091&projectId=277 > > Build statistics: > State: Error > Previous State: Building > Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 07:06:27 -0800 > Fin

Re: Classloading code in core contribution processing

Hi Rajini just back in from vacation and catching up. I've put some comments in line but the text seems to be circling around a few hot issues: - How closely class loading should be related to model resolution, i.e. options 1 and 2 from previously in this thread - Support for split namsepaces/sha

Re: Problems with maven-antrun-plugin

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Matthew Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a problem to do with maven-antrun-plugin while doing a Tuscany > build, and I mention it in case anyone else ever has the same difficulty. > > I was starting with a fresh install of maven, and thus a fresh maven > r

Re: Trouble with aggregating definitions.xml in distro

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been working on modifying the existing bigbank demo to include > security (things that have been tried and working in the securie-bigbank > demo). > > All seemed fine, until I tried the modified bigbank d

Re: [TEST] Conversation Lifetime

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to add a few iTests for Conversation Lifetime items that > don't seem to have explicit tests, In particular, I am looking at: > > 1) The ability to continue a conversation by loading a reference > that had

Re: Trouble with aggregating definitions.xml in distro

So, just to be clear again... > > > > > > > Hi Venkat > > > > Can I just clarify that you are saying that you are having problems > > because > > of the way that the shader plugin is aggregating the definitions.xmlfiles > > that now appear in various extension modules, e.g. binding-ws-axis2, > >

Re: Classloading code in core contribution processing

Hi Rajini I'm covering old ground here but trying to make sure I'm looking at this in the right way. A - How closely class loading should be related to model resolution, i.e. options 1 and 2 from previously in this thread A1 (classloader uses model resolver) - standardizes the artifact resolut

Re: Problems with maven-antrun-plugin

e.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin: checking for > updates from central > Downloading: > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/1.1/maven-antrun-plugin-1.1.pom > 1K<http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/1

Re: Exposing composite file as a web service

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Sandeep Raman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Can the composite file be exposed as a web service to external world. > how can i go about it. can you please guide me. > > regards > Sandeep Raman. > =-=-= > Notice: The information contained

Re: svn commit: r631266 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/contribution/src/main: java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/contribution/processor/ resources/META-INF/services/

Sebastien This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be used. I'm interested as I'd like to see us open up the contribution service a bit and provide some interfaces that allow us to operate on contributions (find artifacts, read artifacts, resolve artifacts etc.) rather than

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be > > used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if > the > > Workspace Admin should als

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > >> Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more > items > >> and tried to organize them in three categories: > >> > >> A) Contribution workspace (containi

Re: svn commit: r631266 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/contribution/src/main: java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/contribution/processor/ resources/META-INF/services/

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > > Sebastien > > > > This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be > used. > > I'm interested as I'd like to see us op

Re: Composite and PolicySet processing in ContributionServiceImpl?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a fair amount of special handling code for composites and > policySets in ContributionServiceImpl. > > I guess these are hacked workarounds for some issues? any idea what the > issues were? > -- > Jean-S

Re: Composite and PolicySet processing in ContributionServiceImpl?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> There is a fair amount of special handling

Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > > It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping

Are comments on SVN commit messages archived anywhere?

Are comments posted against SVN commit messages in tuscany-dev archived anywhere? Simon

Re: Are comments on SVN commit messages archived anywhere?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure I understood what you are looking for, but tuscany-commits is > archived in [1] > > [1] > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-commits%40ws.apache.org/maillist.html > > On Thu, Feb

Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > >> Looks good to me, building on your i

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >