[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-08 Thread Jason Tan
If I'm not mistaken, that still requires you to page through 5000 at a time until you reach the end to figure out the number of followers. I don't need the user ids of each follower, just the count. Being able to get this with users/show is perfect because it only requires one API call. Except

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-05 Thread PJB
The friend/follower counts are TOTALLY off. Why can't new features be introduced without breaking critical existing features? When will this be fixed. Many of us rely on these counts for accurate f/f counts! On Sep 4, 8:49 pm, John Kalucki jkalu...@gmail.com wrote: The 5k limit is a bug.

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-05 Thread Jesse Stay
Again, I can't stress this enough - when bugs like this are introduced, it is imperative that follow limits are also removed temporarily (or on a case-by-case basis) so we can make this up to our users. I've already had to issue refunds to a couple due to this. If you need me to send you the

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-05 Thread Dewald Pretorius
Jesse, Last night when this thing hit I actually immediately thought about you and wondered how it impacted you. I'm now thanking my lucky stars that I don't do mass unfollow. I do have the unfollow those who unfollow me feature, but I have limited it to a maximum of 10 unfollows every 8 hours,

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-05 Thread Jesse Stay
Fortunately it only affected a couple users, but I'd like to make it up to them. BTW, this didn't affect the mass unfollow feature you saw Scoble and others using (that would have worked fine). This affected the unfollow those who unfollow me feature. We have safety valves in place as well, but

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-05 Thread Dewald Pretorius
I would have built in something like doing an array diff before doing any unfollow, and if the diff is 10%+ of the old followers list, then just bail and do nothing. Even the mass unfollow would not have worked, if the API returned only 5,000 friends instead of the full list, correct? Dewald

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-04 Thread freefall
Until today you could use: http://twitter.com/followers/ids.xml and get the total - this was way more accurate than getting it from user/show. They appear to ahve just lowerd this total to 5000 so that will no longer work (unless that's a bug). On Sep 3, 7:24 am, Waldron Faulkner

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-04 Thread John Kalucki
The 5k limit is a bug. Working to fix. On Sep 4, 6:51 pm, freefall tehgame...@googlemail.com wrote: Until today you could use:http://twitter.com/followers/ids.xml and get the total - this was way more accurate than getting it from user/show. They appear to ahve just lowerd this total to 5000

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-03 Thread Waldron Faulkner
Same oddness w. friends count as well? I'd guess so. My problem is that if I try to get followers using paging, I get different numbers (and different followers) than if I pull the entire list w/o paging. Also, followers disappear and reappear from one hour to the next. On Sep 2, 5:44 pm, Jason

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count

2009-09-02 Thread Scott Haneda
I hope you find out. I long ago gave up. If I really needed the feature, I would scrape that one out of the html, which I know is frowned upon, however, as your data shows, this is pretty all over the map. On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Jason Tan wrote: Anyways, to get back to my

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers Count doesn't add up with the actual followers

2009-07-06 Thread Chris Prakoso
I can confirm this now. I just pulled the remaining followers that were not in the paged follower-list, but exist in the social-graph. So far all of them are suspended account. I guess with the paged list, the API only brings back the ones that are active. Chris On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:37 PM,

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers Count doesn't add up with the actual followers

2009-07-03 Thread Tim
Where are the other 200 go ? To answer your questions, chances are that these 200 accounts have been disabled (probably for being spam accounts), but I noticed there are still counted in the number of followers. Tim

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers Count doesn't add up with the actual followers

2009-07-03 Thread Howard Siegel
Others have also noticed that some accounts show up multiple times in the list of followers when retrieved via the API. Not sure why that happens, but it does. - h On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:37, Tim timot...@gmail.com wrote: Where are the other 200 go ? To answer your questions, chances

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers Count doesn't add up with the actual followers

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Prakoso
Thanks Matt for pointing to the right place. Hope that this issue can be resolved quickly, because the alternative of hitting the individual user for all followers would be a disaster. Chris On Jul 2, 3:27 pm, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote: Hi Chris,      Welcome to the group! Take a

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count via api not consistent with real data

2009-05-18 Thread Doug Williams
This is a known issue: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=580 Thanks, Doug -- Doug Williams Twitter Platform Support http://twitter.com/dougw On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:58 AM, alon alon.car...@gmail.com wrote: I filed abug on this but im wondering if someone else is

[twitter-dev] Re: Followers count via api not consistent with real data

2009-05-18 Thread Peter Denton
So does this also create the scenario where followers (not count) called via the api are different than the followers on the site? I have a client who has spam followers appearing on our site when we call followers method via the api and the same followers are not under her account on the site.