Well it's taken 7 weeks, but I finally got an email basically saying
we weren't accepted onto the beta program.
Fair enough - it is a beta, least we can make other plans now.
dw.
On Apr 19, 12:39 am, Mamadou Bobo Diallo dia...@gurumades.com wrote:
We are all waiting for Site Stream
I'm intrigued - has anyone else been given Site Streams access in the
last month? We signed the Terms of Service over a month ago and have
heard nothing since, despite asking here, via email and via
@SiteStreams
I'm interested to know whether all applications have been frozen or
whether it's
We are all waiting for Site Stream whitelisting. The issues here is
that you are stuck not knowing either you should invest more time in
building a product you never tested. Unfortunatly, site stream is
the only API on which our product make sense building on.
So let have finger crossed and hope
Hey Taylor,
Thanks for the response, totally appreciate that Site Streams is in
beta and as such wait times and access may vary.
It would help us a lot if we could however get some more feedback on
our beta application, even if it's to say we're not giving you access
yet because xyz - we'll
Taylor,
Can you give us some time estimate? I have a development team stuck
now, nothing more we can do to test with User Streams. I put in weeks
ago too for this whitelisting.
Mark
On Apr 5, 7:46 am, Nicholas Chase nch...@earthlink.net wrote:
I put in my request on 2/21 and got approved on
Hi all,
Site Streams is still in beta and the wait times are variable based on the
needs constraints of the beta program. As with any beta, we're learning
what more is necessary to productionize the API at scale to the kinds of
applications that are requesting access -- by requesting access,
I'm still waiting too.
Put the request in on 28th Feb. Got a response to sign ToS just under
3 weeks later. Responded immediately, been waiting over 2 weeks for a
response to that.
HTH,
dw.
On Mar 2, 5:12 pm, Rich rhyl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still waiting. I did get an email on the 21st Feb
I put in my request on 2/21 and got approved on 3/3. I should point
out, though, that I did email (just once!) to follow up.
Nick
On 4/5/2011 7:02 AM, David W wrote:
I'm still waiting too.
Put the request in on 28th Feb. Got a response to sign ToS just under
3 weeks later. Responded
I just registered for site streams this morning because I did not
realize that this was the only authorized way of building a website
that uses twitter. We are trying to demo something at SXSW, and launch
a few weeks after, and I am wondering if I cant use the other APIs
because of rate limits or
There are lots of ways to create website apps without using site
streams. If you describe the type of things you want to do here, you
will get plenty of advice. You don't have to reveal any secret plans.
Just describe the type of data you need from Twitter and the type of
changes you need to make
I'm still waiting. I did get an email on the 21st Feb asking me to
sign a ToS for Site Streams and reply... which I duly did a few
minutes later.
Yet I've heard nothing since then. Someone at Twitter did reply to me
on Twitter itself saying they are usually reviewed every 1 to 2 weeks,
but again
I understand the APIs from a technical perspective. The issue is about twitter
*policy* around rate limits and connection limits. As a non whitelisted app we
will quickly run into rate limits so I am just trying to understand what the
current rules are.
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Adam Green
12 matches
Mail list logo
