I fully blame Twitter. They got us all hooked by being agreeable and easy
going then we go and get all huffy over little things. :-P
Abraham
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 16:03, Dewald Pretorius wrote:
> > You don't have to have respect for third-party developers -- it's your
> > site and you can do a
> You don't have to have respect for third-party developers -- it's your
> site and you can do as you like -- but common sense should tell you
> that it behooves you to at least *try* to hide your contempt.
I think I'm known for now and then directing a flame thrower in the
direction of the Twitte
Quoting Caliban Darklock :
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey Friedl wrote:
Not doing so is just another way you show that you have no respect for
third-party developers, essentially telling them to get lost.
I find it terribly ironic when people complain that it is somehow
"contempt"
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey Friedl wrote:
>
> Not doing so is just another way you show that you have no respect for
> third-party developers, essentially telling them to get lost.
I find it terribly ironic when people complain that it is somehow
"contempt" when a company does not doc
> > we do, however, have this pagehttp://
> apiwiki.twitter.com/Counting-Charactersthat we put up a month ago
> > that explains how to count your characters correctly and to help define
> what
> > twitter means by "140".
>
> But can't you at least update the official API docs (where developers
> lo
> we do, however, have this
> pagehttp://apiwiki.twitter.com/Counting-Charactersthat we put up a month ago
> that explains how to count your characters correctly and to help define what
> twitter means by "140".
But can't you at least update the official API docs (where developers
look for the fi
