[twitter-dev] Re: from:user and since_id breaking Search API

2009-10-28 Thread George V. Reilly

I'm *not* using since_id, but I'm sporadically getting warning
messages about it. Most of the time, my queries work.

d:\curl http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=
%23jquerylang=enpage=1show_user=truerpp=15

{
  results: [{
profile_image_url: http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/353780044/
avatar_normal.png,
created_at: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:05:02 +,
from_user: 2twittdotcom,
to_user_id: null,
text: create a simple infinite carousel with  #jquery
http://2twitt.com/3u7;,
id: 5244850622,
from_user_id: 33556519,
geo: null,
iso_language_code: en,
source: lt;a href=quot;http://apiwiki.twitter.com/quot;
rel=quot;nofollowquot;gt;APIlt;/agt;
  }],
  max_id: 5244850622,
  since_id
: 5056020580,
  refresh_url: ?since_id=5244850622q=%23jquery,
  results_per_page: 15,
  page: 1,
  completed_in: 0.02854,
  warning: adjusted since_id to 5056020580 (2009-10-22 00:00:00
UTC), requested since_id was older than allowed,
  query: %23jquery
}

It's very annoying. Any ideas?


[twitter-dev] Re: from:user and since_id breaking Search API

2009-10-26 Thread arjun

I am seeing issues with twitter search using since_id.

The search results the query returns is not correct for atleast few
hours. I think, some synchronization happens every certain number of
hours. Also, if since_id is old, it expires.

I don't find it to be that useful.

Thanks,
Arjun.

The synchronization is very

On Oct 23, 8:06 am, Marc W marcwanchipm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Damon!

 I'm not 100% sure I buy this explanation:

 1. This problem wasn't happening a day or two ago.

 2. I tried executing the query on the command line, and incremented
 the since_id by 1 maybe 8-10x ... it just doesn't return any results.

 Even weirder is that if I wait 20 minutes, and execute the same query
 with the same original since_id, then I might get some of the results,
 but not all of them.

 Currently, the only solution I can see is to simply never use since_id
 and just filter out - on the client - those tweetids I've seen
 already.  Seems like a horrible waste of bandwidth and computing
 power, and especially strange given that this largely worked a few
 days ago, right before some other changes were rolled out that also
 seemed to cause a sudden increase in 500-series errors being returned
 from the servers and other weirdnesses.

 Thanks,
 Marc.

 On Oct 23, 9:31 pm, Damon Clinkscales sca...@pobox.com wrote:

  Christopher

  To my recollection, for search with since_id to work properly, the
  tweet id must be in the search index.  In this case:

 http://search.twitter.com/search?q=+from%3Asilent_tester02

  does not yield the Dinner, movie, drinks. tweet in the index.

  As an aside, I did an exact match search on that phrase above and it
  returned many results that are not exact matches. But that's a
  separate issue.

  You could file an issue about the fact that the results coming back
  are not always consistent, but the first thing I would do is make sure
  that I am using a since_id that actually exists in the search index.
  Granted this can be a bit of a pain to verify this 100% of the time
  because sometimes tweets do not end up in the search index (which
  appears to be the case here). But in my experience, most of the time,
  they do.  So as a test, pick a tweet you know is in the index and make
  some calls with it over a period of time.  See if the results are
  consistent.

  Best,
  -damon
  --http://twitter.com/damon

  On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Christopher Warren

  christopher.war...@gmail.com wrote:

   We have an app that runs searches regularly, and recently stopped
   receiving new tweets. After investigating we found a search
   combination that seems to break the search API. Instead of getting a
   response with no tweets, an .atom request errors and a .json request
   404s.

  http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=from:silent_tester02since_id...
  http://search.twitter.com/search.atom?q=from:silent_tester02since_id...

   Changing the query to not use from:username works as expect, but I've
   put several usernames in and they all respond the same way. I haven't
   managed to narrow down the cause of the problem much further than
   that, but we're handling it in our code by rescuing any failed
   searches and appending since: with the date of the most recent tweet
   to the q.

   Any thoughts on what might be causing this would be appreciated.


[twitter-dev] Re: from:user and since_id breaking Search API

2009-10-23 Thread harshavs

We are experiencing the same thing as Marc. We are not using from:
though.
But intermittently it gets tweets in significant number. If I try to
get the same set again using the since_id for this particular crawl, I
again get no tweets.

Any Idea on this issue?

Thanks.

On Oct 23, 10:48 am, Marc W marcwanchipm...@gmail.com wrote:
 We've started seeing this too.  If we specify a since_id, then
 periodic refetches will frequently return no new tweets (but
 sometimes they will return new ones).    If we simply drop the
 since_id, then all new tweets are fetched.

 Some new server optimization thing gone wrong?

 Thanks!

 On Oct 20, 10:06 pm, Christopher Warren christopher.war...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  We have an app that runssearchesregularly, and recently stopped
  receiving newtweets. After investigating we found a search
  combination that seems to break the search API. Instead of getting a
  response withnotweets, an .atom request errors and a .json request
  404s.

 http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=from:silent_tester02since_id..

  Changing the query to not use from:username works as expect, but I've
  put several usernames in and they all respond the same way. I haven't
  managed to narrow down the cause of the problem much further than
  that, but we're handling it in our code by rescuing any failedsearchesand 
  appending since: with the date of the most recent tweet
  to the q.

  Any thoughts on what might be causing this would be appreciated.


[twitter-dev] Re: from:user and since_id breaking Search API

2009-10-23 Thread Damon Clinkscales

Christopher

To my recollection, for search with since_id to work properly, the
tweet id must be in the search index.  In this case:

http://search.twitter.com/search?q=+from%3Asilent_tester02

does not yield the Dinner, movie, drinks. tweet in the index.

As an aside, I did an exact match search on that phrase above and it
returned many results that are not exact matches. But that's a
separate issue.

You could file an issue about the fact that the results coming back
are not always consistent, but the first thing I would do is make sure
that I am using a since_id that actually exists in the search index.
Granted this can be a bit of a pain to verify this 100% of the time
because sometimes tweets do not end up in the search index (which
appears to be the case here). But in my experience, most of the time,
they do.  So as a test, pick a tweet you know is in the index and make
some calls with it over a period of time.  See if the results are
consistent.

Best,
-damon
-- 
http://twitter.com/damon

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Christopher Warren
christopher.war...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have an app that runs searches regularly, and recently stopped
 receiving new tweets. After investigating we found a search
 combination that seems to break the search API. Instead of getting a
 response with no tweets, an .atom request errors and a .json request
 404s.

 http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=from:silent_tester02since_id=4979161317
 http://search.twitter.com/search.atom?q=from:silent_tester02since_id=4979161317

 Changing the query to not use from:username works as expect, but I've
 put several usernames in and they all respond the same way. I haven't
 managed to narrow down the cause of the problem much further than
 that, but we're handling it in our code by rescuing any failed
 searches and appending since: with the date of the most recent tweet
 to the q.

 Any thoughts on what might be causing this would be appreciated.


[twitter-dev] Re: from:user and since_id breaking Search API

2009-10-23 Thread Dave B

I'm getting the same issue as Marc and harshavs too.

I'm using since_id to start a search from the last set of resuts but
generally get 0 results most of the time, even though the same search
without since_id yields lots of results.

I could start logging tweet IDs against user IDs, and then work
backwards down the list of past results until I get a since_id that
yields results, but it does seem like a bit of a pain.

This is my first time using the search API so I can't even tell you
when this started happening. It just happens!

For info: search is using negation operators, OR and from:

Dave

On Oct 23, 10:29 am, harshavs harsh...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are experiencing the same thing as Marc. We are not using from:
 though.
 But intermittently it gets tweets in significant number. If I try to
 get the same set again using the since_id for this particular crawl, I
 again get no tweets.

 Any Idea on this issue?

 Thanks.

 On Oct 23, 10:48 am, Marc W marcwanchipm...@gmail.com wrote:

  We've started seeing this too.  If we specify a since_id, then
  periodic refetches will frequently return no new tweets (but
  sometimes they will return new ones).    If we simply drop the
  since_id, then all new tweets are fetched.

  Some new server optimization thing gone wrong?

  Thanks!

  On Oct 20, 10:06 pm, Christopher Warren christopher.war...@gmail.com
  wrote:

   We have an app that runssearchesregularly, and recently stopped
   receiving newtweets. After investigating we found a search
   combination that seems to break the search API. Instead of getting a
   response withnotweets, an .atom request errors and a .json request
   404s.

  http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=from:silent_tester02since_id..

   Changing the query to not use from:username works as expect, but I've
   put several usernames in and they all respond the same way. I haven't
   managed to narrow down the cause of the problem much further than
   that, but we're handling it in our code by rescuing any failedsearchesand 
   appending since: with the date of the most recent tweet
   to the q.

   Any thoughts on what might be causing this would be appreciated.