Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Michael Steuer
I have the same question and have posed it repeatedly via various channels... For some reason Twitter refuses to comment on it... On 12/9/09 1:01 PM, "Damon Clinkscales" wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Isaiah Carew wrote: >> From the announcement I read here: >> >> http://www.techcr

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread TJ Luoma
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Raffi Krikorian wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote: >>> there will be much more information about this soon.  in general, the >>> API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments >>> that are unable to bring up a

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Damon Clinkscales
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Isaiah Carew wrote: > From the announcement I read here: > > http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/09/twitter-le-web-2009/ > > > 3) ... starting Basic Auth decprecation in June 2010. My question is...how do you drop Basic Auth support without OAuth delegation. Otherw

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Raffi Krikorian
i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P more detail will be coming - but, in general, i would ask developers to think about privacy from their users' standpoint :P On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote: >> there will be much more information about this soon.

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Cameron Kaiser
> there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the > API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments > that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients, > presumably, can still bring up a web page? What about text-only client such as TTYtter

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Raffi Krikorian
there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients, presumably, can still bring up a web page? either way, the benefit of the web page is that you

Re: [twitter-dev] Announcements

2009-12-09 Thread Cameron Kaiser
> Is there more info about this available. I'd love to know more about the > "API for browser-less apps" -- specifically: > 1) Will this be appropriate for desktop clients? Indeed. -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Sy