I have the same question and have posed it repeatedly via various
channels... For some reason Twitter refuses to comment on it...
On 12/9/09 1:01 PM, "Damon Clinkscales" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Isaiah Carew wrote:
>> From the announcement I read here:
>>
>> http://www.techcr
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Raffi Krikorian wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>>> there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the
>>> API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments
>>> that are unable to bring up a
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Isaiah Carew wrote:
> From the announcement I read here:
>
> http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/09/twitter-le-web-2009/
>
>
> 3) ... starting Basic Auth decprecation in June 2010.
My question is...how do you drop Basic Auth support without OAuth
delegation. Otherw
i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P
more detail will be coming - but, in general, i would ask developers
to think about privacy from their users' standpoint :P
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>> there will be much more information about this soon.
> there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the
> API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments
> that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients,
> presumably, can still bring up a web page?
What about text-only client such as TTYtter
there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the
API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments
that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients,
presumably, can still bring up a web page? either way, the benefit of
the web page is that you
> Is there more info about this available. I'd love to know more about the
> "API for browser-less apps" -- specifically:
> 1) Will this be appropriate for desktop clients?
Indeed.
--
personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Sy