Hello,
If I want to reply on a mail and I want to have that the receiver of the
reply has the possibility to display in same thread like many mail
readers do, do I have to use the 'References' header or 'In-Reply-To'
header ?
It seems that both are sometime used, eg I see a thread here started
Excuse me, but how I can know that you have missed the key messages
and don't download the file that we are speaking?
There are a snipped of messages from Francois in this mailing list:
Subject: [twsocket] HTTP client component and document encoding
Date: 21 Jul 2005 17:15:19 GMT
Yes, I
The problem is that different mailers use different systems, so you
should consider as many as you can. One last thing you must consider
is for those mailers (very common!) who do not even include any
reference to the original, except the subject Re: origina_subject.
dZ.
On Aug 30,
Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
much smaller than download one.
Is GET faster than PUT?
In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
FP Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed difference.
Server caches files, is that the
Hello DZ-Jay,
Aha I get it. So if I wants to be compatible I include both of them,
just as your email reader does.
One more question, is there a max length fur these headers ?
---
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 11:07, DZ-Jay wrote:
The problem is that
Dod wrote:
Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
much smaller than download one.
Yes I know, I was just wondering whether file caching can make such a big
difference.
BTW: I already suggested last year to write/implement a tiny buffered stream
class, that would
Hello Arno,
I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought
around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)
AG Dod wrote:
Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
much smaller than download one.
AG Yes I know, I was just
Hello!
I have such a problem:
When I log on to remote host (Linux) via ftp protocol I get to root
node (/), so I can view all directories.
Why I can't get to my home directory at once I've connected?
Is it problem concerned with ftp server or with my program?
procedure TForm1.Connection;
Artem Antonov a écrit :
Hello!
When I log on to remote host (Linux) via ftp protocol I get to root
node (/), so I can view all directories.
Why I can't get to my home directory at once I've connected?
Is it problem concerned with ftp server or with my program?
Hi,
this is a problem with
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:25:24 +0200
Guillaume MAISON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artem Antonov a écrit :
Hello!
When I log on to remote host (Linux) via ftp protocol I get to root
node (/), so I can view all directories.
Why I can't get to my home directory at once I've connected?
Is it
Artem Antonov a écrit :
Hi,
this is a problem with your FTP server, not the Ftp Client.
it's the FTP server that generates the file list and
manages all the files and directories stuff.
Thanks. But strange thing: when I connect with another ftp client
(SmartFTP), I get to home directory.
Artem Antonov a écrit :
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:01:58 +0200
olivier-serveur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you try 'passive ftp' ?
Yes,
FTPClient.Passive := True;
It may have effect on connection result?
no, when you read your home directory (just after the connect).
Are you sure that
12 matches
Mail list logo
