Re: [twsocket] TTwitter component

You should really consider making in freeware/opensource. You'll gain something: other people will find bugs and make enhancements. Your own applications will then be better. And you'll enter the hall of fames :-) Always been a bit skeptic about open source, how do you make money from that :)

[twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Hello , Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used? -- Best regards, Antol mailto:spama...@mail.ru -- To unsubscribe or

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Antol wrote: Hello , Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used? Either: Host: smtp.googlemail.com / or smtp.gmail.com Port: 25 SSL-Type:

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails through smtp.gmail.com? Goggle only support SSL, so you must use a mail demo supporting SSL. Angus -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Arno Garrels wrote: Antol wrote: Hello , Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used? Either: Host: smtp.googlemail.com / or

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Arno Garrels wrote: Arno Garrels wrote: Antol wrote: Hello , Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used? Either: Host:

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

A kind of related note - if you are downloading mail from Gmail (using POP3) Gmail does not behave as usual servers where you issue RETR command and deletes message only after you issue DELE command but instead it uses settings from Gmail account and seems to ignore DELE command completely. If you

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Hello Arno, Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 3:42:39 PM, you wrote: Ah forgot the button-sequence on the left. Connect | Ehlo | StartTLS | Ehlo | Auth |..as usual It says: RequestDone Rq=0 Error=SSL Handshake failed EIcsSsleayException File not found: SSLEAY32.DLL It seems that I don't have

[twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

When I looked at Indy and Ararat Synapse they both prefer blocking sockets to connect to text-based protocols like HTTP, POP, SMTP, FTP etc. The reason - because communication is flowed - you send command, you wait reply, if reply does not match you handle error. It is all nice line-by-line

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

See: http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

I much prefer non-blocking. While receiving data from a httpcli f.e or over a slow connection etc, my app keeps running while waiting for data. without having to complicate it all with extra threads for everything. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Zvone pha...@gmail.com wrote: When I looked at

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

Abstraction classes, events and complexity are consulting bargains ;-) -Message d'origine- From: Zvone Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:26 PM To: ICS support mailing Subject: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets? So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

Zvone wrote: When I looked at Indy and Ararat Synapse they both prefer blocking sockets to connect to text-based protocols like HTTP, POP, SMTP, FTP etc. The main advantage of non-blocking is that you do not need one thread per connection. Writing multi-threaded applications is not easy and

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

Let's say you are writing a multi-socket HTTP downloader such as the one in the ICS demo. With sync/blocking sockets, you would have to launch multiple threads per file. Why would you launch 4 threads for a 4Mbps DSL download with thread syncronization hassle? We use ICS async logic in our IQ

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code is so much simpler without them? ICS does not prefer events, it offers both blocking synchronous and non-blocking async versions of most high level component methods. So developers can make their own choice depending on application

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

It is all much better explained here why blocking is better: http://www.ararat.cz/synapse/doku.php/about I would not say that blocking is better. Programming with synchronous functions needs less callbacks and thus gives more compact code at the cost of performance. If this is OK depends on the

Re: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?

It is all much better explained here why blocking is better: Maybe you should not believe everything you read on a web page... Maybe you should use one of those libraries... So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code is so much simpler without them? That's simply wrong. Event

Re: [twsocket] SSL send emai using gmail?

Hello Zvone, Thanks all, finally it works! Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 4:28:23 PM, you wrote: Z See: Z http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download -- Best regards, Antolmailto:spama...@mail.ru -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket

[twsocket] ICS group on social networks LinkedIn and FaceBook

Hi ! Every ICS user is invited to be part of ICS-group on Linked-In. See http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/136245 Why ? Just to have a little bit more visibility for everyone of us and for ICS. There is another one on FaceBook: