Francois PIETTE wrote:
So the question is: what is the best highest number to use ?
Should they be in the WM_USER or WM_APP range?
Borland is already using messages starting from $B000 and $BC00 (See
Controls.pas).
Both $B000 and $BC00 are in the WM_APP range.
BTW: I also found OCM__BASE
Reading MSDN about WM_APP and WM_USER, I think WM_USER through 0x7FFF is the
correct range to use sin ce those messages are sent to the private hidden
window created by TWndControl. The only possible colision is with developper
own defined messages which are not allocated dynamically.
So we
There is currently a call for paper (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526)
for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS
and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
The author of the freeware
Error 10053 is frequently caused by security products such as ZoneAlarm or
other firewall-likes.
It is also possible there is something (software or hardware such as a
router) which times out after some minutes of innactivity.
--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit
Hello Arnoldo,
Is server and client on same LAN without routers in between ?
10053 is 'software caused connection abort'. Until now I only got this
error when there is some transport line (leased line or other
interconnection) not correct working (most hardware problems).
I also recall Norton
Francois PIETTE wrote:
So we could make TWndControl start form WM_APP - 1 and going down.
Going down is not convincing me, I would prefer a constant start number.
1024 through 32767 is a wide range, I think it's OK to reserve 1000 or
2000 or even more numbers below WM_APP - 1, so that the
Francois PIETTE wrote:
TWndCntrol could also have a property (maybe just public to avoid
making it visible in the OI which would confuse most basic users) to
select the starting message number, another to select up/down for
next message number and finally a last one for the maximum number of
Hello Arno,
Just an idea. Wy not making it a startng property ? Then it is
evenutally user definable.
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 20:53, Arno Garrels wrote:
Francois PIETTE wrote:
So we could
Francois PIETTE wrote:
There is currently a call for paper
(http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer
Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
Any killing idea ?
I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-threaded
server
