[twsocket] THttpCli Compression
Hello Francois, I have seen some work for compression in HTTPClient. I wonder if this feature will be able to be disabled because for our load balancer, the LAN traffic is better be uncompressed. Best Regards, SubZero -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] new year
Wilfried Mestdagh a écrit : Hello, I wants to wish TeamICS, Francois, and the whole community a happy new year, good business in 2006 and most of all interesting projects :) Happy new year to everyone, on this list and also everywhere else :) May it bring you almost what you desire (not everything, you wouldn't have anything for the next year ;) ) Best regards, -- Guillaume MAISON - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 83, Cours Victor Hugo 47000 AGEN Tél : 05 53 87 91 48 - Fax : 05 53 68 73 50 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web : http://nauteus.com -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] OT rather big project question
Hello, I am starting a re-write one of my ICS-based server to be able to handle 15.000 permanent cnx smoothly. The datas Clients will send/receive will be only 2KB packets time to time. As Windows OS is limited with sockets and handle (whenever you can do some tricky changes in registry) I have decided to split connections. Now I am wondering which solution could be the best : - Multiple concentrators that accept between 2000/5000 connections, each concentrator (quite simple small application) will do only one connection to Main server that use SQL database (MySQL for example). If main server is down users are still connected to concentrator that will notify users and wait until server is up again without. - Multiple Servers accepting 2000/5000 connections each, each server connect to SQL datbase. When there is a server maintenance, it will drop down all user's the client application will try reconnect until server is up again. Both solution permit to split data traffic across switched network so it will lower general bandwidth. I think I will use MySQL that should be enought and will have to manage 1 or 10 max connections at same time dependig if I choose first or second solution. First solution may permit smoother server updates as client part stay always connected to concentrator and it's concentrator that will keep connection to main server. Do you have any idea/advice ? Regards. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] OT rather big project question
Hello Wilfried, Yes, I also thought that concentrator-to-server could be direct TCP-IP or any other kind of protocol (HTTP tunneling for example), also I found other advantage, I could make concentrator-to-server connection initiator, or server-to-concentrator way so this would be nice whenever there is some NATing on some side. WM At first tought I should go for first solution because of a few WM advantages. WM - server updates as you say yourself WM - application is splitted separate according the job it does. WM The concentrators dealing with the clients and the proto, between WM concentrator and main server you can exchange data with same or WM another protocol depending what fit's best, or middleware. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] OT rather big project question
First solution seems better to me. You can also have a mix of the two solutions. For example having 8 concentrators with 2000 users and 2 servers. This will allow easy fault tolerance. The concentrators would connect randomly to one of the two servers and if one is down, connect to the other. The client application can also apply the same fault tolerant or load balancing system: they would have a prefered concentrator and one or more fallback concentrators. Concentrators could also communicate (maybe thru the servers) with each other to redirect client to another one should another one be less loaded. All that is not very difficult to implement. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware) Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware) http://www.overbyte.be - Original Message - From: Dod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: [twsocket] OT rather big project question Hello, I am starting a re-write one of my ICS-based server to be able to handle 15.000 permanent cnx smoothly. The datas Clients will send/receive will be only 2KB packets time to time. As Windows OS is limited with sockets and handle (whenever you can do some tricky changes in registry) I have decided to split connections. Now I am wondering which solution could be the best : - Multiple concentrators that accept between 2000/5000 connections, each concentrator (quite simple small application) will do only one connection to Main server that use SQL database (MySQL for example). If main server is down users are still connected to concentrator that will notify users and wait until server is up again without. - Multiple Servers accepting 2000/5000 connections each, each server connect to SQL datbase. When there is a server maintenance, it will drop down all user's the client application will try reconnect until server is up again. Both solution permit to split data traffic across switched network so it will lower general bandwidth. I think I will use MySQL that should be enought and will have to manage 1 or 10 max connections at same time dependig if I choose first or second solution. First solution may permit smoother server updates as client part stay always connected to concentrator and it's concentrator that will keep connection to main server. Do you have any idea/advice ? Regards. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] HttpCli - How set Oncookie event at runtime?
Hi to All.. I writing a function to post and get some data via Httpcli... it's work fine, but i need to catch cookies after posted data.. How i set and create a procedure to onCookie event? When the httcli is created at runtime? I Use a global var to store cookies but the problem is to set OnCookie event.. I get this error: Incompatible types: 'TCookieRcvdEvent' and 'Procedure' Everyone have idea? Thanks in advance.. Mac Ps: Sorry for my poor english. - Yahoo! Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] Mulitple file upload using HTTP
Does anyone have an example of mulitple file upload using HTTP. I've downloaded httpcliexample.zip and can upload single files, however when I try to upload mulitple files I get HTTP busy all the time and only upload the first file. Many Andy Law This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Mulitple file upload using HTTP
Hello Andrew, Create one instance HTTPCli per upload ? AL Does anyone have an example of mulitple file upload using HTTP. I've AL downloaded httpcliexample.zip and can upload single files, however when I AL try to upload mulitple files I get HTTP busy all the time and only upload AL the first file. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] HttpCli multiple download
AL Does anyone have an example of mulitple file upload using HTTP. I've
AL downloaded httpcliexample.zip and can upload single files, however when
I'm working on a project which involves a sequence of file downloads via
http GET.
I noticed that a message posted with PostMessage in OnDocEnd event will
always precede the message WM_HTTP_SET_READY.
procedure THttpCli.GetBodyLineNext;
[..]
TriggerDocEnd; -- in OnDocEnd event I post the message
if {(FResponseVer = '1.0') or (FRequestVer = '1.0') or }
{ see above}
{ [rawbite 31.08.2004 Connection controll] }
(FCloseReq) then { SAE 01/06/04 }
FCtrlSocket.CloseDelayed
else
SetReady; -- here WM_HTTP_SET_READY message is posted
If the message code tries another download, the component gives an exception
Http component busy, because SetReady sends a message too.
So I guess the correct place to immediately start another download is
StateChange event.
My question: is the message WM_HTTP_SET_READY required?
What happens if I change the code this way?
procedure THttpCli.SetReady;
begin
StateChange(httpReady);
//PostMessage(Handle, WM_HTTP_SET_READY, 0, 0);
end;
StateChange is called from an event handler... so an event is executed
inside another event handler... bad design I think. But it works ;)
Greetings
--
Marcello Vezzelli
CTO
Software Development Department
E-Works s.r.l.
tel. +39 059 2929081
fax +39 059 2925035
Direzionale 70 - Via Giardini 456/c
41100 Modena - Italy
-
La presente comunicazione, che potrebbe contenere informazioni riservate e/o
protette da segreto professionale, è indirizzata esclusivamente ai
destinatari della medesima qui indicati. Le opinioni, le conclusioni e le
altre informazioni qui contenute, che non siano relative alla nostra
attività caratteristica, devono essere considerate come non inviate né
avvalorate da noi. Tutti i pareri e le informazioni qui contenuti sono
soggetti ai termini ed alle condizioni previsti dagli accordi che regolano
il nostro rapporto con il cliente. Nel caso in cui abbiate ricevuto per
errore la presente comunicazione, vogliate cortesemente darcene immediata
notizia, rispondendo a questo stesso indirizzo di e-mail, e poi procedere
alla cancellazione di questo messaggio dal Vostro sistema. E' strettamente
proibito e potrebbe essere fonte di violazione di legge qualsiasi uso,
comunicazione, copia o diffusione dei contenuti di questa comunicazione da
parte di chi la abbia ricevuta per errore o in violazione degli scopi della
presente.
-
This communication, that may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information, is intended solely for the use of the intended addressees.
Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this message, that
do not relate to the official business of this firm, shall be considered as
not given or endorsed by it. Every opinion or advice contained in this
communication is subject to the terms and conditions provided by the
agreement governing the engagement with such a client. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to
this email and then delete it from your system. Any use, disclosure, copying
or distribution of the contents of this communication by a not-intended
recipient or in violation of the purposes of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] HttpCli - How set Oncookie event at runtime?
You should show the code you have: the offending like and the procedure definition. Be sure to use a procedure of object and not a simple procedure. If you don't know how to declare it, just drop a HTTP component on the form, use the object inspector to create the event handler, then delete the component from the form and assign the event handle to your dynamically created component. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be - Original Message - From: Macfly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS - Lista twsocket@elists.org Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:14 PM Subject: [twsocket] HttpCli - How set Oncookie event at runtime? Hi to All.. I writing a function to post and get some data via Httpcli... it's work fine, but i need to catch cookies after posted data.. How i set and create a procedure to onCookie event? When the httcli is created at runtime? I Use a global var to store cookies but the problem is to set OnCookie event.. I get this error: Incompatible types: 'TCookieRcvdEvent' and 'Procedure' Everyone have idea? Thanks in advance.. Mac Ps: Sorry for my poor english. - Yahoo! Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] Dnslookup... WSocket...
Is DNSLookup with WSocket async? Thanx! -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] WSocket DNSLookup.
Is there any way to do a WSocket DNSLookup and OnLookupDone get adress of host that have been looked up? Thanx -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Dnslookup... WSocket...
Hello Ja, Is DNSLookup with WSocket async? yes. please dont reply to a thread if subject is different. Many modern email reader can sort on thread so many people will not see your question if they are not interested in the thread (in this case 'problem with overbyte website') --- Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html http://www.mestdagh.biz -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Problem with Overbyte website
There is no activex, only a java applet for the snow :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Problem with Overbyte website Francois PIETTE wrote: A user reported a problem when accessing my website http://www.overbyte.be. When clicking on the applet with the snow, he get a 404 page from overbyte.com domain (note .com, not .be). From here, I have no problem at all. Can I ask you to check and tell me USING PRIVATE EMAIL, NOT THE LIST, if it works or not ? Francois, Just my 2 cents, but do you really need active-x on your website? Conservative people like me could be frightened. Arno -- Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
