Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> http://xp-antispy.org/ Mine was from LvlLord, but looking in my folder it seems my latest Sophos anti-virus has deleted it... Hopefully Anti=Spy will last longer. > Windows 2007, a I'm currently downloading I wonder why thr shop dislike me and won't let me download it! Angus -- To unsubsc

Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread Arno Garrels
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote: >> *Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way >> to by-pass? >> *From:* DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally >> crippled to prevent you from using the "client" version for a

Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread Fastream Technologies
Perhaps you guys can test the IE7 on Windows 2007 with my stress tester: http://www.fastream.com/ics/WebStressTester.zip Try with a small file and a large static file. Also try connection: close and keep-alive. Very user friendly and hi-performance--does not open 1 thread for each connection. Be

Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread Darin McGee
I just downloaded it - not too big - 1.8GB for the x86 version - 2.4GB for the x64 version- No problems. You do have to "order" it on-line for the free D/L. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd Sent: Saturda

Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> *Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way > to by-pass? > *From:* DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally > crippled to prevent you from using the "client" version for any > high-performance communications, and force

Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to by-pass?

2007-05-05 Thread DZ-Jay
On May 4, 2007, at 10:02, Fastream Technologies wrote: > I would not believe -before trying myself- this is what M$ called > "rewriting of TCP/IP stack"!! It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally crippled to prevent you from using the "client" version for any high-perfo