Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
Please let me know of result of the test. THANKS! SZ On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hello Dod, I think the TrustedCAPath.pem that comes with ICS does not cover the root cert that signed mail.google.com. PLEASE do test the code against as

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Dod
Hello Fastream, For now it is stable, no crash, I check gmail each 5 mins, 227MB transfered today at the time I write this mail. I will definitly abandon stunnel ;-) regards. FT Please let me know of result of the test. FT THANKS! FT SZ FT On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Fastream

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
Hello Dod, Would you pay $20 for this product? If you need it, how much would you pay for SSL-TCP tunnel proxy with 10k connections support? What about $400 for a site license? Best Regards, SZ On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Dod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Fastream, For now it is

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Dod
Hello Fastream, I don't know ... there are already many free SSL proxy solution. Supporting 10k connections may be interesting for hudge networks but I think that people will prefer Linux based solution that do it for free. regards. FT Would you pay $20 for this product? If you need

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Dod
Hello, FT Ok I see how you view it. I had read that MS had great plans for Windows FT 2008 as a server OS. How do you guys evaluate it? Do you think Linux TCP/IP FT is superior or is it just people preferring Linux because it's free? Linux is free that's true, but it is also prefered for

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
Ok, is there any way to compile ICS/BCB2009 code for Linux? I had enabled WSocket::keepalive for the timeout problem! Best Regards, SZ On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Dod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, FT Ok I see how you view it. I had read that MS had great plans for Windows FT 2008

[twsocket] OT RE: OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--lookingforward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Darin McGee
http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3646 (20081127) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com

Re: [twsocket] OT: Beta yet stable secure tunnel client--looking forward to your comments!

2008-11-27 Thread Dod
Hello Fastream, FT Ok, is there any way to compile ICS/BCB2009 code for Linux? FT I had enabled WSocket::keepalive for the timeout problem! You should add a setting to specify timeout delay. I suggest you to read stunnel help page to see what kind of conf parameters it provide, may be