Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS
> > client/server to upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in
> > the source. Can applications support both protocols with no
> > modi
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS
> client/server to upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in
> the source. Can applications support both protocols with no
> modification or must one make a separate listening/target IP per v4
> and v6?
Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS client/server to
upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in the source. Can
applications support both protocols with no modification or must one make a
separate listening/target IP per v4 and v6?
Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at
Arno, Thanks for the detailed explanation.
SZ
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hi Arno,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >>> Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels
> wrote:
>
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
>>> Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with
>>> NO_ADV_MT defined? It bombs
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
> > Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT
> > defined? It bombs in web server component!
>
> Thanks, it'
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
> Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT
> defined? It bombs in web server component!
Thanks, it's fixed now and checked in.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change
Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong. Anyway, can
you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT defined? It bombs
in web server component!
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >
> > I have tried w
Fastream Technologies wrote:
>
> I have tried what you said but it still gives "read of address
> ".
>
> This is the problematic line:
>
> adminHTTPServer = new THttpServer(NULL);
I know :)
>
> Maybe you call it with a non-null parameter in your tests? But this
> should also work bec
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hi again Arno,
> >
> > Here is what I did:
> >
> > - renamed the old ICS folder to something like "ICS IPv4 backup"
> > - checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
> > - copied th
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hi again Arno,
>
> Here is what I did:
>
> - renamed the old ICS folder to something like "ICS IPv4 backup"
> - checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
> - copied the old BCB2010 package's project files over so that I would
> not have to re-e
Hi again Arno,
Here is what I did:
- renamed the old ICS folder to something like "ICS IPv4 backup"
- checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
- copied the old BCB2010 package's project files over so that I would not
have to re-enter all the defines
- cleared the project fi
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Ok that's passed now with what you suggested. I now get the below AV:
>
> http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error2.png
>
> This is the first listening web server socket, for the admin
> interface...
This call stack makes no sense IMO.
TCustomSocksWSocket.Create c
Ok that's passed now with what you suggested. I now get the below AV:
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error2.png
This is the first listening web server socket, for the admin interface...
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
> > Fastream Te
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Also, as I have asked before, can you make:
>>
>>procedure CheckDelaySetReady; { 09/26/08
>> ML }
>>
>> in httpprot.pas as virtual?
>
> Done in both trunk and IPv6.
>
>>> with our defines went well. However in t
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Also, as I have asked before, can you make:
>
>procedure CheckDelaySetReady; { 09/26/08
> ML }
>
> in httpprot.pas as virtual?
Done in both trunk and IPv6.
>> with our defines went well. However in the project, it gave the
>> followi
Also, as I have asked before, can you make:
procedure CheckDelaySetReady; { 09/26/08 ML }
in httpprot.pas as virtual?
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Fastream Technologies
wrote:
> Dear Arno,
>
> Here is the first impression with the new IPv6 code. P
Dear Arno,
Here is the first impression with the new IPv6 code. Package compile with
our defines went well. However in the project, it gave the following error
on Winsock2.hpp:
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error.png
Hope you can help. Our unit httpmtsrv inherits from Overbyteicshttpsrv.pas
See subject.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
19 matches
Mail list logo
