Re: [twsocket] SFTP

2014-03-19 Thread Graham Powell
s.org] On Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd Sent: 19 March 2014 11:16 To: twsocket@lists.elists.org Subject: Re: [twsocket] SFTP > I get the impression there are two types of secure FTP: SFTP or FTPS are non-standard confusing names, and different people interpret them in differ

Re: [twsocket] SFTP

2014-03-19 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> I get the impression there are two types of secure FTP: SFTP or FTPS are non-standard confusing names, and different people interpret them in different ways. That's why we specify FTP SSL, and not FTPS to clearly identify what is offered by ICS. There is also FTP over SSH, which is really a U

Re: [twsocket] SFTP

2014-03-19 Thread Graham Powell
:16 To: twsocket@lists.elists.org Subject: Re: [twsocket] SFTP > I am starting to get users who want to step up the security of the FTP > connection and are tending towards SFTP (S being Secure and not Simple > in this case) rather than FTPS. Simplicity of getting though firewalls > s

Re: [twsocket] SFTP

2014-03-19 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> I am starting to get users who want to step up the security of the > FTP connection and are tending towards SFTP (S being Secure and not > Simple in this case) rather than FTPS. Simplicity of getting though > firewalls seems to be a consideration. Don't believe SSL makes firewall support any

[twsocket] SFTP

2014-03-19 Thread Graham Powell
I am starting to get users who want to step up the security of the FTP connection and are tending towards SFTP (S being Secure and not Simple in this case) rather than FTPS. Simplicity of getting though firewalls seems to be a consideration. I see that ICS now has a suite of SSL components, but is