Very good!!!
So is it time to re-apply zlib patch to u-boot main tree, together
Alessandro's patch?
Wolfgang, what's your position?
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of Stefan Roese
Sent: Tuesday,
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you
wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's
disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
Dear Giuseppe CONDORELLI,
In message 001601ca1012$e0f72730$c0818...@st.com you wrote:
Very good!!!
So is it time to re-apply zlib patch to u-boot main tree, together
Alessandro's patch?
Wolfgang, what's your position?
Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
Best
Dear Wolfgang,
Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
Maybe I've not understood.
Do you mean you are waiting a new zlib patch [v4] that includes Alessandro's
patch, to apply
only one patch containing all?
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang
Hi All,
I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
1)
In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
From line 553 in ehci-hcd.c:
typeReq = req-request 8 |
Dear Giuseppe CONDORELLI,
In message 001701ca1015$dbf7fae0$c0818...@st.com you wrote:
Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
Maybe I've not understood.
Do you mean you are waiting a new zlib patch [v4] that includes Alessandro's
patch, to apply
only one patch
Dear rhabarber1848,
In message h4orm0$l1...@ger.gmane.org you wrote:
Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
please do not commit the zlib-1.2.3 patch in its current state, although
Alessandro's patch fixes on bug there is still the problem that the
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20090727185329.874ef2ae.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang, please pull (mostly) support for the VME8349 board (it's
initial patch was posted well in advance of the window) and a couple of
fixes:
The following changes since commit
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 200907280729.23996...@denx.de you wrote:
The following changes since commit 10c7604d021949464b1e4ba903df95e6b2f0d2ff:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare 2009.08-rc1
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de you wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
are available in the git repository
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de you wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
are available in the
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1248835792-1882-1-git-send-email-kumar.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
All Rights Reserved conflicts with the GPL.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala kumar.g...@freescale.com
---
Wolfgang,
I would ask that you apply this now rather than later as it just addresses the
Hello Wolfgang,
Heiko Schocher wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de you wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
This patch adds watchdog reset call to allow its invokation during decompression
phase. This control was present on old zlib version and here it is
backported for those relevant routines. This patch is sent as a zlib separate
one beacuse it was not tested due to specific board lack.
zlib patches
Hi rhabarber1848,
please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes ago?
NOTE: the first one is waiting for approval due to its big size.
Thanks, I hope these patches will solve your issue.
G.
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
Hi rhabarber1848,
please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes ago?
Unfortunately you add outcb() only in inflatestart and inflateend. IT should
also go in the main loop.
Being an out-callback with arguments, it should be called during copy to
output, with proper
Hi,
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi rhabarber1848,
please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes
ago?
Unfortunately you add outcb() only in inflatestart and inflateend. IT
should also go in the main loop.
you are right. The two patches sent
Hi rhbarber1848,
I've merged patches into one only and resent it to list (v5).
Please verify once more the issue is solved, to close it definitively.
Cheers and thanks,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 07:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Wolfgang Denkw...@denx.de wrote:
My patch tracking is based on the Subject: lines, and it causes
additional work (and eventually introduces errors) when you rename
Do you use Patchworks? I don't know if it handles renamed patches,
but a public patchworks
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
Linux kernels ( 8MB) can be booted.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
include/configs/amcc-common.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3
This patch moves the load addresses for kernel, fdt and ramdisk to higher
addresses (= 16MB). This enables booting of bigger kernel images (e.g.
lockdep enabled).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
include/configs/amcc-common.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
Some Canyonlands boards are equipped with different SODIMM's. This is no
problem with the normal NOR booting Canyonlands U-Boot, since it
automatically detects the SODIMM's via SPD data and correctly configures
them. But the NAND booting version is different. Here we only have 4k
of image size to
This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
Signed-off-by: Phong Vo p...@amcc.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
cpu/ppc4xx/cpu.c| 23 +++
include/asm-ppc/processor.h |2 ++
include/ppc440.h|5 +
3 files
This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
Signed-off-by: Phong Vo p...@amcc.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
board/amcc/canyonlands/canyonlands.c | 26 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message ed82fe3e0907290717p2584db95l5fdf5cfa60cb6...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Wolfgang Denkw...@denx.de wrote:
My patch tracking is based on the Subject: =A0lines, =A0and =A0it =A0ca=
uses
additional =A0work =A0(and =A0eventually
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:25 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
Linux kernels ( 8MB) can be booted.
Might be nice to increase CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:27 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear John,
in message 1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns you wrote:
It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
Correct. And the DULG
Hi Peter,
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:36:17 Peter Tyser wrote:
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even
bigger Linux kernels ( 8MB) can be booted.
Might be nice to increase
Hi,
2009/7/29 Lv Terry-R65388 rui...@freescale.com:
Hi All,
I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
1)
In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
From line 553 in
Remy Bohmer wrote:
Hi,
2009/7/29 Lv Terry-R65388 rui...@freescale.com:
Hi All,
I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
1)
In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
This patch updates zlib to the latest stable version.
Hi,
this patch finally works for me, thank you.
Reviewed-by: rhabarber1848 rhabarber1...@web.de
Cheers, rhabarber1848
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:41 PM
To: Remy Bohmer
Cc: Lv Terry-R65388; Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Is it an error in function
ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
[mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:49 PM
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
Dear
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:05:45PM +0530, Rupesh Kumar wrote:
I am using u-boot version 1.3.0 included in freescale LTIB released for
MPC8313ERDB custom board.
I tried NAND booting of MPC8313ERDB board using this u-boot and it worked
fine.
Using similar procedure i tried NAND boot on my
Dear Rupesh Kumar,
In message
of532b0371.e31eb889-on65257602.0059777c-65257602.005a0...@lntemsys.com you
wrote:
I am using u-boot version 1.3.0 included in freescale LTIB released for
MPC8313ERDB custom board.
I tried NAND booting of MPC8313ERDB board using this u-boot and it worked
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202de13c...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com
you wrote:
Hopefully you might have received my new patch series (posted 30 hours back)
I know it's very busy time for you.
I received it, but did not have time for a thorough review yet.
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4a7003a4.2050...@denx.de you wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Heiko Schocher wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de you wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit
94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
Wolfgang
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:53:44 +0200
Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
When updating the reg in the /localbus/fl...@f000,0 node
size was wrong updated for the first flash, because the total
size was filled in, instead of the right size for it.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
Hi Prafulla,
I'm using a little-endian machine.
My board is freescale i.mx51, the core is arm12.
I will try to correct these two places and test it in my board.
Hope it can work.
Thanks~~
Yours
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Prafulla Wadaskar
hello, everyone.
Has somebody ported U-boot to s3c6410? I want add mmc/sd reading and
writing in 6410 u-boot. Can somebody give me some hints?
Thanks in advance.
--
Michael L.
Jul 30, 2009
___
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
Linux kernels ( 8MB) can be booted.
This patch also sets CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN to 16MB (default 8MB) to enable
decompression of bigger images.
42 matches
Mail list logo
