Hi Wolfgang,
On 22 October 2014 12:13, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > So something like
>> > buildman '^am335x_evm$'
>> > would work?
>>
>> Yes:
>
> Thanks a lot!
I hope/think that we are getting through most of the use cases now.
The main iss
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > So something like
> > buildman '^am335x_evm$'
> > would work?
>
> Yes:
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groeben
Hi Wolfgang,
On 22 October 2014 11:56, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message z5cxbfsum8lju2...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > >> My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being
> > >> mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one
>
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> >> My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being
> >> mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one
> >> board, am335x_evm_config but buildman am335x_evm builds the whole family
> >> of configs. For a build
Hi Wolfgang,
On 22 October 2014 11:37, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20141022171908.GC25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being
>> mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one
>> board,
Dear Tom,
In message <20141022171908.GC25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being
> mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one
> board, am335x_evm_config but buildman am335x_evm builds the whole family
> of
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20141022160936.GY25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > I think for Wolfgang's case that might just have to be handled with an
> > external wrapper, translating all of the ways to run MAKEALL into
>
> Yes,
Dear Tom,
In message <20141022160936.GY25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> I think for Wolfgang's case that might just have to be handled with an
> external wrapper, translating all of the ways to run MAKEALL into
Yes, you are right, an external wrapper would work, too. Silly me.
OTOH, why not k
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:11:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On 22 October 2014 02:33, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Tom,
> >
> > In message <20141014081724.GF25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >>
> >> No, not yet. I am going to mention in the release notes that we're
> >> going
On 10/22/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On 22 October 2014 02:33, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> In message <20141014081724.GF25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
>>> No, not yet. I am going to mention in the release notes that we're
>>> going to strongly start think
Hi Wolfgang,
On 22 October 2014 02:33, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20141014081724.GF25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> No, not yet. I am going to mention in the release notes that we're
>> going to strongly start thinking about deleting MAKEALL. We can pick up
>> the depr
Dear Tom,
In message <20141014081724.GF25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> No, not yet. I am going to mention in the release notes that we're
> going to strongly start thinking about deleting MAKEALL. We can pick up
> the deprecation patch early in the next merge window.
Can we please keep at l
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:38:36AM +0200, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 28 August 2014 17:43, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Since buildman now includes most of the features of MAKEALL it is probably
> > time to talk about deprecating MAKEALL.
> >
> > Comments welcome.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon
Hi Tom,
On 28 August 2014 17:43, Simon Glass wrote:
> Since buildman now includes most of the features of MAKEALL it is probably
> time to talk about deprecating MAKEALL.
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Should this patch go in the release?
Regards,
Simon
__
Since buildman now includes most of the features of MAKEALL it is probably
time to talk about deprecating MAKEALL.
Comments welcome.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v10: None
Changes in v9: None
Changes in v8: None
Changes in v7:
- Remove already-applied patches from the series
- Add
15 matches
Mail list logo
