Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-09-11 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Wolfgang, > > Does anyone out there by chance have a failure case for gcc > 4.0.0, > > because I can't seem to reproduce the issues others had in the past. > > Do you have an up-to-date patch that can be used for such testing? I just sent an example patch (ppc: Relocation test patch) that oth

Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-09-09 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > Dear Peter, > > In message <1252426573.6005.253.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote: > > > > Going over the emails and my own testing, it looks the following > > versions worked: > ... > > Thanks for the detailed analysis. > > I remember that gcc-3.4.x has always been marked as "suspicious"

Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-09-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter, In message <1252426573.6005.253.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote: > > Going over the emails and my own testing, it looks the following > versions worked: ... Thanks for the detailed analysis. I remember that gcc-3.4.x has always been marked as "suspicious" in our tests, so for

Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-09-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 12:16:13 Peter Tyser wrote: > I did some debug on gcc 3.4.3/binutils2.3.4/glibc2.15 which was a known > non-working setup on an MPC8548-based board. I'm 98% sure the the > reason it fails because it doesn't properly generate .fixup sections. > No .fixup sections are pr

Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-09-08 Thread Peter Tyser
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:49 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Peter Tyser wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:38 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> Someone tried to get proper relocation working a while ago, but ran into > >> toolchain bugs. Maybe current toolchains are better... > > > > X-ES's board's in U-

Re: [U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-08-27 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > Peter Tyser wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:38 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> Someone tried to get proper relocation working a while ago, but ran into > >> toolchain bugs. Maybe current toolchains are better... > > > > X-ES's board's in U-Boot fully relocate to SDRAM with the > > CONFIG_REL

[U-Boot] PowerPC -mrelocatable

2009-08-27 Thread Scott Wood
Peter Tyser wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:38 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> Someone tried to get proper relocation working a while ago, but ran into >> toolchain bugs. Maybe current toolchains are better... > > X-ES's board's in U-Boot fully relocate to SDRAM with the > CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS