On 14:23 Tue 22 Apr , Jared Holzman wrote:
> This patch adds support for the AT91SAM9263EK board. It builds on top of
> the support added for the AT91SAM9260EK by Stelian Pop. It was created
> against the u-boot-at91 custodian tree, so I hope this is correct place to
> submit it.
> ---
Patch
On 21:24 Mon 21 Apr , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Move non-inlied functions into specific drivers file
> > Set get_prom as weak
> >
> > Coding Style Cleanup
>
> Please split in two (3?) separate patches. Thanks.
We could separate the Coding style in a
On 21:26 Mon 21 Apr , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > add support of :
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_ASKENV
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_LOADS
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_LOADB
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_PING
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_CDP
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_SAVES
> > #define CON
Apologies for the previous patch, forgot to add the new files to it. No
wonder it seemed so short.
Here it is again
---
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index cf16bd6..c6d903e 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2311,6 +2311,9 @@ at91rm9200dk_config:unconfig
at91sam9260ek_config:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 21 april 2008 23:05
> To: Kim Phillips
> Cc: Stefan Roese; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used
> _start instead of
>
Hi All,
I am working on a MPC8313ERDB REVA4 board and need to work with a nand
device using u-boot. I am using u-boot version 1.3.2 and under the
driver/mtd/nand directory there is a file called nand.c. In this file it
makes a call to a function called board_nand_init(). From what I can tell
th
This patch adds support for the AT91SAM9263EK board. It builds on top of
the support added for the AT91SAM9260EK by Stelian Pop. It was created
against the u-boot-at91 custodian tree, so I hope this is correct place
to submit it.
---
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index cf16bd6..c6d903e 10064
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:10:29 +0800
> Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Update the default load address. if not, the kernel image
>> will be overwritten when u-boot boot the latest linux kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> include/config
This reverts commit 70431e8a7393b6b793f77957f95b999fc9a269b8 which has
proven problematic getting right from the start at least on 83xx and
4xx.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 11 ---
lib_ppc/board.c |1 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > I tried understanding what you are trying to do, and even though I
> > > feel it's not exactly an important or frequently used feature for
> > > most of the users I tried to come up with a compro
micheal wrote:
> Ken Fuchs wrote:
> > #define CONFIG_SUPPORT_VFAT
> >
> > --- FAT16 vs. FAT32 - Atmel U-Boot v1.1.5 issue? ---
> >
> > I have found that the USB support is better
> > when the USB Storage device is FAT16 formatted
> > rather than FAT32 formatted. For some reason
> > not all files
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I tried understanding what you are trying to do, and even though I
> > feel it's not exactly an important or frequently used feature for
> > most of the users I tried to come up with a compromize that allows
> > you to do what you want
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:10:29 +0800
Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update the default load address. if not, the kernel image
> will be overwritten when u-boot boot the latest linux kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h |4 ++--
>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:45:02 -0500
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:56:42 +0200
> Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The patch 70431e8a7393b6b793f77957f95b999fc9a269b8 (Make MPC83xx one step
> > closer to full relocation.) doesn't use CFG_MONITOR_BASE an
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > Adn then we add "call" and "exec" and "do" and so oon just for other
> > > needed options? I say no.
> >
> > then implement whatever. in the mean time i'll keep forking the Blackfin
> > code.
>
> OK. I
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Adn then we add "call" and "exec" and "do" and so oon just for other
> > needed options? I say no.
>
> then implement whatever. in the mean time i'll keep forking the Blackfin
> code.
OK. I offered you a way out. It's your decision.
I tried unde
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> because of the lists size limit and because I did not find any
> other suitable way to submit this patch, I am posting a link to the patch
> file:
I don't understand. Your posting was below the hard limit and got
ACKed, and it was distributed over th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> add support of :
> #define CONFIG_CMD_ASKENV
> #define CONFIG_CMD_LOADS
> #define CONFIG_CMD_LOADB
> #define CONFIG_CMD_PING
> #define CONFIG_CMD_CDP
> #define CONFIG_CMD_SAVES
> #define CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR
>
> and keep only :
> tftp and dhcp support when
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Move non-inlied functions into specific drivers file
> Set get_prom as weak
>
> Coding Style Cleanup
Please split in two (3?) separate patches. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zun
Dear Matthias,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I am wondering if bootm behaves correctly on CRC errors in kernel and/or
> ramdisk images.
> This is what I observed:
Most has already been said in previous replies, so here just a summary
of the situation:
> 3) Same loading as above
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > go [ -cache={off,d-off,i-off,on,d-on,i-on} ] addr [ args ... ]
> >
> > cache is just an example. other arches may want to do other sort of
> > "system breakdown/cleanup" before relinquishing control.
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master
Kumar Gala (1):
85xx: Fix size of cpu-release-addr property
Timur Tabi (1):
Fix calculation of I2C clock for some 85xx chips
cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c|2 +-
cpu/mpc85xx/speed.c
add support of :
#define CONFIG_CMD_ASKENV
#define CONFIG_CMD_LOADS
#define CONFIG_CMD_LOADB
#define CONFIG_CMD_PING
#define CONFIG_CMD_CDP
#define CONFIG_CMD_SAVES
#define CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR
and keep only :
tftp and dhcp support when CONFIG_SMALLEST is active
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGN
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 06:14 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Some 86xx chips use CCB as the base clock for the I2C, and others used
> > CCB/2.
> > There is no pattern that can be used to determine which chips use which
> > frequency, so the only way to de
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eg. because of rounding error we can get 799Mhz instead of 800Mhz.
>
> Introduced DIV_ROUND_UP and roundup taken from linux kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dejan Minic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Srikanth Srinivasan <[E
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Kumar Gala
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> eg. because of rounding error we can get 799Mhz instead of 800Mhz.
>>
>> Introduced DIV_ROUND_UP and roundup taken from linux kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dejan Minic <
Move non-inlied functions into specific drivers file
Set get_prom as weak
Coding Style Cleanup
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Lungu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
index d5e413b..4131aad 100644
add CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/configs/qemu-mips.h b/include/configs/qemu-mips.h
index e164019..b775714 100644
--- a/include/configs/qemu-mips.h
+++ b/include/configs/qemu-mips.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
*
* This prog
add support of :
#define CONFIG_CMD_ASKENV
#define CONFIG_CMD_LOADS
#define CONFIG_CMD_LOADB
#define CONFIG_CMD_PING
#define CONFIG_CMD_CDP
#define CONFIG_CMD_SAVES
#define CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR
and keep only :
tftp and dhcp support when CONFIG_SMALLEST is active
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGN
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eg. because of rounding error we can get 799Mhz instead of 800Mhz.
>
> Introduced DIV_ROUND_UP and roundup taken from linux kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dejan Minic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Srikanth Srinivasan <[E
Hi,
> #define CONFIG_SUPPORT_VFAT
>
> --- FAT16 vs. FAT32 - Atmel U-Boot v1.1.5 issue? ---
>
> I have found that the USB support is better
> when the USB Storage device is FAT16 formatted
> rather than FAT32 formatted. For some reason
> not all files were accessible on FAT32
> formatted media, but
Aneesh wrote:
> I am using an at91rm9200dk custom board.
> I want to boot kernel and ram disk from the
> usb stick.for that i tried to enable the usb
> support in the uboot. but now i am getting a
> message like no storage devices found .
Someone else has already suggested using a current
U-B
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> On Monday 21 April 2008 17:16, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Matthias Fuchs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after going through the boom code I found out, that
>>> setting the 'autostart' variable to 'no' brings me a little closer
>>> to what I want. But finally I end up
>
This patch removes the temporary 'test' strapping option
of the sbe command. The '667' strapping option now uses
a PLB/PCI divider of 3.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/pmc440/cmd_pmc440.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
dif
Hi Jerry,
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:16, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after going through the boom code I found out, that
> > setting the 'autostart' variable to 'no' brings me a little closer
> > to what I want. But finally I end up
> > in the enable_interrupts(
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after going through the boom code I found out, that
> setting the 'autostart' variable to 'no' brings me a little closer
> to what I want. But finally I end up
> in the enable_interrupts() at the very end of do_bootm(). This freezes
> my system. The reason for this
Hi Aneesh,
Aneesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I am using an at91rm9200dk custom board.I want to boot kernel and
>ram disk from the usb stick.for that i tried to enable the usb support
>in the uboot.but now i am getting a message like no storage devices
>found .
>i gave t
Hi,
after going through the boom code I found out, that
setting the 'autostart' variable to 'no' brings me a little closer
to what I want. But finally I end up
in the enable_interrupts() at the very end of do_bootm(). This freezes
my system. The reason for this is the Linux kernel image that is lo
On Apr 20, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you wrote:
>> eg. because of rounding error we can get 799Mhz instead of 800Mhz.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dejan Minic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-by: Srikanth Srinivasan
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-
eg. because of rounding error we can get 799Mhz instead of 800Mhz.
Introduced DIV_ROUND_UP and roundup taken from linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Dejan Minic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Lets see if this
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:36 +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 00:22 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Wolfgang showed some interest briefly too.[1]
> >>
> >> I am definitely
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 00:22 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>>
>>> Wolfgang showed some interest briefly too.[1]
>>
>> I am definitely interested.
>
> What I would suggest to start with is to teach U-boot to
Hi,
I am wondering if bootm behaves correctly on CRC errors in kernel and/or
ramdisk images.
This is what I observed:
1) I loaded a Linux kernel into RAM at 0x20 on a 405 system. I loaded an
initial ramdisk images
into RAM at address 0x30. Now 'bootm 20 30' boots my system
corr
- Coding style cleanup (long lines)
- Add s1d13505 support
- Make some functions return a result code instead of void
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/common/lcd.c| 123 -
board/esd/common/s1d13505_640_480_16bpp.h |
- enable esd's auto_update mechanism
- support alternative flash layout on rev. 1.8 boards
- update default environment
- use common CFI flash driver
- coding style cleanup
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/APC405.h | 346 ++
- enable esd's auto_update mechanism
- fix LCD support on latest hardware revision (uses other LCD controller)
- support alternative flash layout on rev. 1.8 boards
- coding style cleanup
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/apc405/Makefile |4 +-
board/esd/apc405/a
The APC405 board support has been migrated to use the common
CFI flash driver.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/apc405/strataflash.c | 789
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 789 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 board/esd/apc
- Coding style cleanup (long lines)
- improve handling of protected flash regions
- remove dead code
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/common/auto_update.c | 208 ++-
board/esd/common/auto_update.h | 15 ++-
2 files changed, 106
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Recent commit a4986459 adds reference to dcache_enable set dcache and ecache
> function as __weak.
>
> For cache status function it will return 0 if the function is not implemented
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > or we can add "jump" to cmd_boot.c and merge the differences by just using
> > a function pointer to "do_go_exec" or "do_jump_exec".
>
> untested poc attached
Don't waste efforts on this. I will not accept it.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DEN
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> well, duh. my point was that you're making "go" get duplicated just to
> conform to documentation. the command name itself "go" doesnt really conjurn
> up usage of "executing an application and returning" ... fits better with "go
> to this location
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:19:04AM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> This patch adds two missing free()s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, applied.
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Device Driver
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 01:32 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > > U-Boot will run only software that has been
> > > authenticated to be from the system's producer.
>
> Seems it's time to start a discussion to switch to GPL v3...
>
>
> > > Any commen
Hi,
because of the lists size limit and because I did not find any
other suitable way to submit this patch, I am posting a link to the patch file:
http://www.esd-electronics.com/Customer/mf/0002-4xx-Update-FPGA-image-for-APC405-boards.patch
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi,
because of the lists size limit and because I did not find any
other suitable way to submit this patch, I am posting a link to the patch file:
http://www.esd-electronics.com/Customer/mf/0001-4xx-Update-bootlogo-for-APC405-boards.patch
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bo
Recent commit a4986459 adds reference to dcache_enable set dcache and ecache
function as __weak.
For cache status function it will return 0 if the function is not implemented
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h
inde
On Monday 21 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Providing both a "go" and a "jump" command which differ just in cahce
> > handling seems broken to me. If you want to add such a feature, then
> > I recommend to do it as part of "go", but make it op
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > This makes no sense. If it is ``exactly like "go"'' it doesn't matter
> > > if the code returns or not (and actually this is what I'm trying to
> > > point out all the time).
> >
> > the obvious implic
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Well, it affects only processors which need MMU support. Most doen't.
>
> I'm not so sure here anymore with all the newer PPC's and other platforms.
> But
> I have to admit that I'm no expert for those other platforms.
It's only processors which r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > This makes no sense. If it is ``exactly like "go"'' it doesn't matter
> > if the code returns or not (and actually this is what I'm trying to
> > point out all the time).
>
> the obvious implication is that i would add the cache disabling hooks to
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > This has nothing to do with 440. It's more a general question. But OK,
> > from my
>
> Well, it affects only processors which need MMU support. Most doen't.
I'm not so sure here anymore with all the newer PPC's and other platforms. But
I have to a
- Coding style cleanup (long lines)
- Add s1d13505 support
- Make some functions return a result code instead of void
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/common/lcd.c| 123 -
board/esd/common/s1d13505_640_480_16bpp.h |
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > That makes no sense to me. If you want to boot some OS, use a "boot*"
> > > commands, not "go" or the like.
> >
> > i'm not talking about operating system code, i'm talking about flat
> > binary applicat
This patch adds two missing free()s.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/video/cfb_console.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/cfb_console.c b/drivers/video/cfb_console.c
index 4f73067..68b9861 100644
--- a/drivers
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > You are the 440 expert, not me :-)
>
> This has nothing to do with 440. It's more a general question. But OK, from
> my
Well, it affects only processors which need MMU support. Most doen't.
> understanding, it makes most sense that the i/dcache
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > That makes no sense to me. If you want to boot some OS, use a "boot*"
> > commands, not "go" or the like.
>
> i'm not talking about operating system code, i'm talking about flat binary
> applications that run bare metal. something like "u-boot.bin"
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:28:46PM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > This patch adds some missing free()s and does some coding style clean up.
>
> Please, separate the patches or just send the one which fixes memory
> allocation only.
In principle you ar
On Monday 21 April 2008 09:47, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:28:46PM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > This patch adds some missing free()s and does some coding style clean up.
>
> Please, separate the patches or just send the one which fixes memory
> allocation only.
Please
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Please have a look at my patch:
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:39:23 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Memory footprint optimizations
It rearranges image printing
On Monday 21 April 2008, 甜瓜 wrote:
> Yep! The ppcboot is very ancient. hehe.
> Actually, my board is DHT-walnut: http://elinux.org/DHT-Walnut_U_Boot
So, it's no "real" Walnut. Then the official Walnut U-Boot will probably not
work for your board.
> The web provides a pre-compiled bin uboot 1.1.4
Hi Wolfgang,
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Please note that it is not so easy on 440 to even define *what exactly*
> > the functions/commands d/icache_en/disable mean. This is because 440 has
> > MMU support and we can have different cache setups for all TLB entries.
> > So to
On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > Intended and documented behaviour is that "go" is used to start
> > > standalone applications, which are supposed to return.
> >
> > then how exactly are people supposed to execute their flat binaries ?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:28:46PM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> This patch adds some missing free()s and does some coding style clean up.
Please, separate the patches or just send the one which fixes memory
allocation only.
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/vi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 April 2008 01:18
> To: Peter Pearse
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm
>
> On 15:32 Thu 17 Apr , Peter Pearse
Dear Stefan,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I don't like to see these either, but it's better than lying in the
> > face of the user.
>
> Please note that it is not so easy on 440 to even define *what exactly* the
> functions/commands d/icache_en/disable mean. This is because 440
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 01:23 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Add -v for verbose output, "Unlocking flash...", "Done" etc.
> > Add -q for quiet operation, do not print error and verbose
> > messages.
>
> This seems kind of redundandant to me.
>
> And not
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Intended and documented behaviour is that "go" is used to start
> > standalone applications, which are supposed to return.
>
> then how exactly are people supposed to execute their flat binaries ? none
> of
I am not an expert for the Blackfin imp
Hi,
let me summarize: let's take my initial patch that I posted on Friday.
At least two people will be satisfied :-)
Matthias
On Monday 21 April 2008 01:45, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > This patch adds a configurable flash auto protection list that can be
Hi Vasily,
On Friday 28 September 2007, Vasiliy Leoenenko wrote:
> > Your patch was corrupted by your mailer which wrapped long lines. It
> > cannot be applied.
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. Gmail wrapped long lines. So I changed
> mail box. This is the second attempt.
>
> The patch was
79 matches
Mail list logo
