On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:45:02 -0500
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed,  9 Apr 2008 12:56:42 +0200
> Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > The patch 70431e8a7393b6b793f77957f95b999fc9a269b8 (Make MPC83xx one step
> > closer to full relocation.) doesn't use CFG_MONITOR_BASE anymore. But
> > on 4xx systems _start currently cannot be used for this calculation.
> > So revert back to the original version for now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
hmm..I seem to have false-acked this due to a bug in a build script of
mine.

Currently WD's top of tree renders 83xx kaput.  When I revert this
revert plus Joakim's original 70431e8 commit, things are back to
normal.  I'm not going to pretend I know to fix it up correctly, so
does anyone have a problem with me sending two revert patches until
relocation is properly and comprehensively fixed?

Kim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to