> -----Original Message----- > From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 21 april 2008 23:05 > To: Kim Phillips > Cc: Stefan Roese; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used > _start instead of > CFG_MONITOR_BASE > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:45:02 -0500 > Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:56:42 +0200 > > Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The patch 70431e8a7393b6b793f77957f95b999fc9a269b8 (Make MPC83xx one step > > > closer to full relocation.) doesn't use CFG_MONITOR_BASE anymore. But > > > on 4xx systems _start currently cannot be used for this calculation. > > > So revert back to the original version for now. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > hmm..I seem to have false-acked this due to a bug in a build script of > mine. > > Currently WD's top of tree renders 83xx kaput. When I revert this > revert plus Joakim's original 70431e8 commit, things are back to > normal. I'm not going to pretend I know to fix it up correctly, so > does anyone have a problem with me sending two revert patches until > relocation is properly and comprehensively fixed?
Strange, I got a 8321 and it worked for me. Maybe a toolchain issue? Perhaps I got something extra in my board port, dunno what though. If you revert it we are probably not going to solve it. I got no clue though. Are any other 83xx users out there? Jocke ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
