Kim Phillips schrieb:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:33:10 +0200
> Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would expect something like
>>
>> if ( priv->flags & TSEC_REDUCED )
>> regs->ecntrl |= ECNTRL_RPM;
>
> yeah, that register should be r/o..
>
you're right.
The regi
> -Original Message-
> From: Gururaja Hebbar K R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 April 2008 03:05
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Pearse
> Subject: ARM march architecture version for arm926ejs in config.mk
>
> Hi,
>
> i have seen questions
On 07:34 Wed 02 Apr , Gururaja Hebbar K R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have seen questions on the mailing list about march for arm926ejs
> being mentioned as -march=armv4.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--ARM%3A-Fix-arm-architecture-version-for-ar
> m926ejs-td5195486.html#a5210157
>
> http://www.nabb
Hello,
I try to modify the env toll for accessing nand flash.
My problem the structure of the enviroment:
If I understand:
4 byte crc; 1 byte flags, 0x2-5 byte data.
The Enviroment has a size of 0x2 bytes. There is a redundant
enviroment too.(same size)
The CRC is over the data bytes,(
æ¨å¥½ï¼å½ å
ææå¨ çå¬ç ç å®´éè¯·æ¨ åå ï¼æ å¾
çæ¨ç å
临ä¸æ 导交æµï¼ å°å¸¦ç»æ¨ ææ³ä¸å° çæ¶è·ï¼
20 08å¹´4 æ27æ¥ ï½30æ¥ ï¼å¨å京 举è¡å¬ç å¿çä¸ä¸ å§åä¼æ ç«å¤§ä¼æ¨ é¦å±å¬ç é«å³°è®ºå "ã
å¬ç æ¯å®æï¼ æ¯ç¥å¦
Hi ,
Has anyone tried using pxa270 udc in u-boot ?
--
Thanks
Vivek
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick
It cannot get louder than thi
I never knew telling time can make one so happy indulging in timepiece
collection. http://www.poleigea.com/
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell se
Dear Manuel,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> My problem the structure of the enviroment:
> If I understand:
> 4 byte crc; 1 byte flags, 0x2-5 byte data.
Correct - the flag byte is only present if you use redundant
environment.
> The CRC is over the data bytes,( not the flags b
Hello,
how does uboot handle this flag byte ? (i I use redundant nand)
What initial value must this flag have?
Same value for enviroment1 and enviroment2 ?
If I make a "saveenv" which env. is used, and what values are then
written to the NAND flash to set it as aktiv/deactive ?
For example:
I
cmd_nand.c:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
cmd_nand.c:356: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:39:11PM +0530, Vivek Kutal wrote:
> Hi ,
> Has anyone tried using pxa270 udc in u-boot ?
I posted a patch in the past... the patch was functional but it needed
some fixes, expecially regarding EP0 management.
Please, search into ML's archive.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc837xerdb/mpc837xerdb.c
b/board/freescale/mpc837xerdb/mpc837xerdb.c
index 83fb60d..965bb67 100644
--- a/board/freescale/mpc837xerdb/mpc837xerdb.c
+++ b/board/freescale/mpc837xerdb/mpc837xerdb.c
@@ -
Hi Ben and Sascha,
> This patch adds a driver for the following smsc network controllers:
> LAN9115
> LAN9116
> LAN9117
> LAN9215
> LAN9216
> LAN9217
This patch most likely covers exactly what the SMSC LAN9x1x driver
covers I sent earlier in March. How is the decision going to be made
whic
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> fdt.c: In function 'ft_cpu_setup':
> fdt.c:33: warning: implicit declaration of function 'do_fixup_by_prop_u32'
> fdt.c:39: warning: implicit declaration of function 'do_fixup_by_compat_u32'
> fdt.c:43: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fdt_fixup_e
Hi Ben,
> Sorry, tonight has been time-shifted. I'll have a look today.
Any news?
Regards,
Mark
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Sou
Hi,
I have a custom board with a MPC8347E and U-Boot doesn't have a config for
this cpu.
which config is more appropriate to use for my board ? (maybe MPC8349EMDS or
sbc8349 or tqm834x ?).
any tips ? TIA.
cheers,
Fathi
-
Ch
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Mark Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben and Sascha,
>
>
> > This patch adds a driver for the following smsc network controllers:
> > LAN9115
> > LAN9116
> > LAN9117
> > LAN9215
> > LAN9216
> > LAN9217
>
> This patch most likely covers
Hi Fathi,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a custom board with a MPC8347E and U-Boot doesn't have a config for
> this cpu.
> which config is more appropriate to use for my board ? (maybe MPC8349EMDS or
> sbc8349 or tqm834x ?).
>
> any tips ?
Fathi,
there are 3 different MPC834x (3,7 and 9) which all have same silicon.
The difference is the package.
The 43 has a small package and the 49 a big one. The 47 is available in
both. Package size defines PCI bus (small has 1x 32Bit, large has 64-Bit
or 2x 32Bit) and memory bus width.
Which
> The schematic for the MPC8349EMDS is available on Freescale's web
> site, and I believe TQS makes their schematics available too. I don't
> know about the SBC one (Wind River, maybe?). Ultimately, compare
> schematics to your board and choose the one that's most similar as a
> starting point.
You are ready for Wall Street
View the best and widest variety of brand name watches here now
http://www.loeirag.com/
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just abou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> how does uboot handle this flag byte ? (i I use redundant nand)
I already answered that. See my previous message.
> What initial value must this flag have?
> Same value for enviroment1 and enviroment2 ?
No. Please see my previous mesage, and the cod
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> cmd_nand.c:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> strict-aliasing rules cmd_nand.c:356: warning: dereferencing type-punned
> pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNI
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> cmd_nand.c:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> strict-aliasing rules
> cmd_nand.c:356: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> strict-aliasing rules
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The schematic for the MPC8349EMDS is available on Freescale's web
> site, and I believe TQS makes their schematics available too. I don't
TQ only provisdes the schematics for the carrier board, but not for
the CPU modules.
Best regards,
Wolfgang D
On 16:39 Wed 02 Apr , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > cmd_nand.c:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> > strict-aliasing rules
> > cmd_nand.c:356: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> > strict-aliasing rules
> >
>
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know RHEL - maybe you can update the RPM?
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of. Its a box run by our IT department so I have
> > no ability to upgrade or modify things. It looks like RHEL4 has the
> >
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> On the FDT front, we have twoTHREE outstanding bugfix patches:
I confirmed my error, the notation is indeed 32 bit cells per the
DTC documentation (and his other changes are valuable improvements). As
a result, I've added Andy's patch to my queued-t
Andy Fleming wrote:
> The fdt set command was treating properties specified as <00> and <0011>
> as byte streams, rather than as an array of cells. As we already have
> syntax for expressing the desire for a stream of bytes ([ xx xx ...]),
> we should use the <> syntax to describe arrays of cells,
Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[...]
>>> Any ideas on how to work around this? Do we really intend to pick up
>>> the system md5.h or should we be getting the one from u-boot/include/
>>> md5.h?
>> We need the system md5.h, I think. We'll investigate.
>
> If I force
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> [...]
Any ideas on how to work around this? Do we really intend to
pick up
the system md5.h or should we be getting the one from u-boot/
include/
md5.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:41:21 +0200
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kim
-
Check o
Do the DRAM init according to micron MT47H64M8B6-37E
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/board/ads5121/ads5121.c b/board/ads5121/ads5121.c
index 8629b03..606cc6b 100644
--- a/board/ads5121/ads5121.c
+++ b/board/ads5121/ads5121.c
@@ -15
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I think that generally it is a better idea to use U-Boot's includes when
> building for the host system, as this gives us better control over what
> exactly gets included. But then on the other hand, tools/Makefils has this:
But U-boot doesn't have the
Forwarded to u-boot mailing list...
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Cogley
Subject: Re: u-boot ppc440epx bootstrap configuration without eval board
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Dave Co
Hi All
I am working on AT91SAM9260 ARM9 core. I have very smallflash memory and hence
need to compress the u-boot. I have picked nrv2balgo for that. Can someone
suggest me how to put the compression infoin the u-boot header. I want to know
the details of u-boot header too.
Thanks
Avinash
Some systems have md5.h installed in /usr/include/. This isn't the desired
file (we want the one in include/md5.h). This will avoid the conflict.
This fixes the host tools building problem
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This fixes the problem for me, at least...
common/im
Hi Avinash,
I'm not undestanding if you want compress the U-Boot code or if you want
compress the uImage image.
Anyway, I don't know the nrv2b algorithm, can you give me any links?
thanks,
luigi
Il giorno mer, 02/04/2008 alle 13.54 -0700, Avinash Vijayvergia ha
scritto:
> Hi All
>
> I am worki
On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
> Some systems have md5.h installed in /usr/include/. This isn't the
> desired
> file (we want the one in include/md5.h). This will avoid the
> conflict.
> This fixes the host tools building problem
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Luigi
Thank you for your mail and comments. I should have explain why I want to
compress u-boot. My target processor is Atmel AT91SAM9260. I am having a 64Mb
Dataflash which is interfaced on SPI bus. The Atmel ARM9 copies the first 4kB
to internal SRAM and then boots from there. So we need a
Hi Avinash,
see inline.
Il giorno mer, 02/04/2008 alle 14.26 -0700, Avinash Vijayvergia ha
scritto:
> Hi LuigI
>
> Thank you for your mail. I actually have two questions:
> 1. What is the format of u-boot header? Can you refer me to some
> documentation?
What do you intend for
Transmit Report:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008/04/03 04:16:04, 451, Requested action aborted: No
failover server
--- Begin Message ---
Send U-Boot-Users mailing list submissions to
u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https:/
> cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 6)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
> > Some systems have md5.h installed in /usr/include/. This isn't the
> > desired
> > f
Il giorno mer, 02/04/2008 alle 14.57 -0700, Avinash Vijayvergia ha
scritto:
> Hi Luigi
>
> Thank you for your mail and comments. I should have explain why I want
> to compress u-boot. My target processor is Atmel AT91SAM9260. I am
> having a 64Mb Dataflash which is interfaced on SPI bus. The Atme
Hi,
In u-boot-1.3.1\drivers\usb\usb_ohci.c driver, if debug is enabled
(#define DEBUG), make comes out with an error as below.
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -Os -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-ffixed-r8 -msoft-float -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE=0x20
-I/home/guru/project/u_boot/Ubuild/
I've been trying to get Das u-boot going on my S3C2410 based board and
had no luck so far. Just trying to get something over the serial port
for now. I have a Wiggler to JTAG the initial u-boot.bin
Part of the problem is the target is brand new and not supported by
anybody yet. I'm wondering if th
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Dave Cogley wrote:
> > Disregard the boot strapping problem. It appears we are hardwired
> > strapped
> > to use option "C" however my CPU is not being recognized as a 667MHz.
> > Which option should I be using for the 667MHz processor?
>
> First, this is the wrong mail
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, April 03,
2008 3:37 AM:
> I've been trying to get Das u-boot going on my S3C2410 based board and
> had no luck so far. Just trying to get something over the serial port
> for now. I have a Wiggler to JTAG the initial u-boot.bin
>
> Part of the problem is
Hi,
Subject: [PATCH] disable CONFIG_ZERO_BOOTDELAY for lwmon5
Change configuartion for lwmon5 board.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/lwmon5.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/lwmon5.h b/include/configs/
Hi,
> This driver seems to be a superset of yours, so this would be the one
> to go in once it's compliant. Sorry for the lack of communication on
> my part.
I am just sorry for the wasted hours it took to clean it up.
So long,
Mark
--
50 matches
Mail list logo
